Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 119 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

  1. 1
    Name: Jeannie Lit-Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Please do not cut education funding for pre-k. My son desperately needs this program. He is looking forward to school since he was 3 yrs. old. However, I am a single mother of 2 children and cannot afford private pre-k school for him. Please do not make my son wait another year.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Andy Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Do not eliminate the funds for universal pre-k. My children need this program to be ready for school.
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Dana Lit on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Please do not eliminate universal pre-k for my grandchildren.
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Jady Lit on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Please do not eliminate universal pre-k for the children of our future.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Joannie Lit on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Please do not take our children's education away by eliminating funds
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: David Lit on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: please do not take universal pre-k away from our children
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Jeff Tsui on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Please do not take away universal pre-k from our children
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Ming Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: do not take the universal pre-k away from our children
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Jessica Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Please do not take pre-k away
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Javison Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Do not take this away from the children
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Aidan Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: do not take away pre-k
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Ericka Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: do not take away prek
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Emily Woo on Mar 15, 2003
    Comments: Do not take away prek
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Felipa Gaudet on Mar 17, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Adam Mastropaolo on Mar 17, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Nina Kelly on Mar 17, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Mary-Powel Thomas on Mar 17, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: C J on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Barbara Bresnahan Duarte on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Erik Engstrom on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments: Please do not put me on any mail or email lists. Thank you, Erik
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Richard Kaplan on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments: Please don't abandon our children. Please don't skimp on the future.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Mary Mastropaolo on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Leslie Couse on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments: Restore the funding for Pre-K through higher education NOW. Education is currently underfunded at all levels in NYS. Local property tax owners cannot bear the cost of this type of tax cut. Our Children are the BEST investment for a bright future. Children deserve better.
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Laurence Porter on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Leo Hoenig on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Susan Waring on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments: Put people before PORK! Money spent on education is money saved in rehabilitation, welfare, prisons and disability.
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Matthew Pleva on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Kathy Moses on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments: Don't cut the schools, the children are to important to turn your back on.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Marylee Driggs on Mar 18, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Terri Bouton on Mar 19, 2003
    Comments: Governor Pataki, when you ran for re-election in November, you ran on a platform of not raising taxes. What you have done with your budget not only decimates public education, you have raised my property taxes for schools close to 30%. Frankly I would rather see less in my paycheck than have you take away 5% of our state aid for Owego Apalachin. You seem to have found plenty of funding for pork barrel projects such as sports halls of fame. Shame on you for punishing the children of New York.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Diane Geary on Mar 20, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Jamie Stutzenburg on Mar 20, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Bonnie Bredes on Mar 21, 2003
    Comments: The future of tomorrow depends on the children of today receiving an excellent education. Removing money from education goes against the "No child left behind" progam. It's time the wealthy and the corporations of this state pay their fair share of the tax burden. Our children's education is too precious to put aside.
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Artemis Schwebel on Mar 21, 2003
    Comments: I am the parent of a 4 year old girl. it truly scares me that she has to go through what she has been going through this year, if she will not go to school as she has been promised next year. She needs preK and it will affect her life in ways that it would traumatize her and her future. As a parent I am deeply concerned and while not an expert I believe that there can be another way of finding funds for such an important progam without just cutting away the funds that support this pre-K program. Thank you.
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Paul Scollo on Mar 22, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Judith Natkins on Mar 24, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Cari Marvelli on Mar 24, 2003
    Comments: We need more support for after-school programs.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Kim Cunningham on Mar 27, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Melanie Gyenes on Mar 27, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Vicki Lowery on Mar 28, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Carol Hawley on Mar 28, 2003
    Comments: New York state has been known for a quality eductional system, let's not put in jeapardy. Our children deserve better-our future requires it Restore monies for education!
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Sari Eckler Cooper on Apr 1, 2003
    Comments: I oppose the budget cuts of our children's education and propose raising corporate taxes.
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Annmarie Ieraci on Apr 1, 2003
    Comments: given the competitive environment, i believe parents would happily pay a fee to send 4 year olds to public pre-k. It is absolutely ruthless to cut the program at this late point in time - there would be no other alternative for numerous hard working families, private schools have already closed out their programs for '03.
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: John Nastasi on Apr 1, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Annmarie Ieraci on Apr 1, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Roseann Tucci on Apr 1, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Jeanine Ieraci on Apr 2, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Lisa Radano on Apr 2, 2003
    Comments: if i'm going to have to pay more for the subway i want my child to benefit from the funds raised. kids matter more than politicians various and often nefarious agendas.
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Margaret Cordi on Apr 2, 2003
    Comments: The proposed elimination of public pre-k is an OUTRAGE that punishes the children of those who are morally and/or financially opposed to private school for 4-year-olds. We're talking about an extremely necessary public service, and to cut it would be to demonstrate that the governor is unable to prioritize properly, that he doesn't understand the needs of his constituents, and that he is inexplicably unable to find a socially and morally acceptable alternative, such as ensuring that state-based corporations are paying their due. The kids are not able to vote, but their parents are.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Idoia Tapia Rubio on Apr 2, 2003
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3

Sponsored links