Signatures 83 total
Page: 1, 2
-
1
Name: Susan on Sep 14, 2007Comments: The comments I read on that site are beyond nasty, and sometimes threatening. It's a rather classless section for an otherwise classy magazine.Flag
-
2
Name: Tiffany A. on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Leah R on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Amie Ritchie on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I think this is highly irresponsible.. These pictures were taken without permission and are being ridiculed behind their backs. I know that to put a photo of a crowd scene where someone shows in the local paper, they need the permission of each person IN the picture.Flag
-
5
Name: Teresa K. Capsey-Hart on Sep 14, 2007Comments: At least have the cojones to 'confront' people to their face and not snarkily via the internet. If you've not the testicular fortitude to stand by your convictions, kindly keep them to yourself.Flag
-
6
Name: Eileen on Sep 14, 2007Comments: Glamour is supposedly to "tolerant," yet you have this site which promotes intolerance. Shame on you.Flag
-
7
Name: Lesley Robinson on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Janet Hazen on Sep 14, 2007Comments: Glamour is usually thoughtful and progressive in print. There are far too many cruel postings on the internet pages of "Don'tspotting." It is damaging to Glamour's reputation, not to mention the feelings of those photographed or those who look like women in the photos.Flag
-
9
Name: Ashley on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I won't be buying this magazine any time soon until this stops.Flag
-
10
Name: Demetra Dunlop on Sep 14, 2007Comments: This website encourages people to bash and spew hatred towards others, especially towards women who don't fit in with society's standards of being young and superthin - you are promoting intolerance towards women who look different from a certain very narrow stereotype of female beauty.Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Sep 14, 2007Comments: There is nothing glamourous about being mean and hurtful to others. Please remove this section.Flag
-
12
Name: April Dunbar on Sep 14, 2007Comments: There is nothing glamourous about being mean and hurtful to others. Please remove this section.Flag
-
13
Name: Robert Siwicki on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I used to buy and subscribe to Glamour and after seeing this section of their website I've had enough. One page in the magazine each month is bad enough and I let it slide but letting people post their own pictures for a lynch mob to comment is going too far.Flag
-
14
Name: ANN PETTIGREW on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I HATE THAT SECTION, ITS OFFENSIVE, SHOULD BE AGAINST THE LAW, AND GROSSFlag
-
15
Name: Erika on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I agree holeheartedly with this petition. Glamour Magazine claims to embrace all women of any age, colour, size. Yet they continue to foster this nasty, hurtful feature on their web site. Time to get rid of it.Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Sep 14, 2007Comments: Human beings do not have a photoshop team with them at all times, unlike the celebrities who are picture in this and every magazine.Flag
-
17
Name: Anonymous on Sep 14, 2007Comments: This whole site makes me very sad. I can't believe so many people have enough time on their hands to not only take and post pictures of complete strangers, but to take the time to review others and rate them and critique them and leave lots of negative comments. There is enough ugliness in this world without adding to it. I would like to see a site where people praise random styles, show off things they like. Not focus on the negativity.Flag
-
18
Name: Laurah on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Michaela Fitzmorris on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I completely agree... don'tspotting is typically nasty, rude, and... do they have permission to use those photos I seriously doubt it.Flag
-
20
Name: Anonymous on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Alexandra on Sep 14, 2007Comments: While I think the "Don't Spotting" feature was originally started in good humor, it has escalated into a forum where a few close-minded individuals absolutely defame these innocent strangers. I have read comments picking on women for having a sunburn, or for their shirt being slightly out of place while walking downtown, or for other situations that can't necessarily be helped. Since when are these bashers immune to these same "mishaps" People lead busy and complicated lives, and don't necessarily look picture perfect at any given moment. Now, in addition to everything else we have to worry about, we now have to worry about being snapped and our picture posted on the internet so that others can ridicule us I think it is also unfair that you don't know the anonymous victim's personal circumstances. How do you know she wasn't wearing that because she was cold, or just rolled out of bed, or was having a bad hair day, or just gave birth, or just had surgery... Why can't we let people go about their personal business As long as they are happy with what they are wearing, who are we to stop them And as far as fashion is concerned, everyone's sense of acceptability is different; who are we to interfere The same colors or cuts of clothing don't work on everybody; it is unrealistic to impose a standard set of rules for everyone. Just because the color purple doesn't suit you doesn't mean that you have to berate someone for wearing purple. It is almost akin to religious fanatics forcing their beliefs down others' throats. "Glamour" magazine strives to convey a message the encourages women to be independent and express themselves; the "Don't Spotting" feature is in direct contradiction to this message. I think it would be in their best interest to remove this feature, and let women live their lives as they please without judgment from complete strangers.Flag
-
22
Name: Pamela Getchell on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Sep 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Rachel M on Sep 14, 2007Comments: Why must people have to be chemically processed from their insides out to look 'beautiful'Flag
-
25
Name: Hannah Barton on Sep 14, 2007Comments: I could not believe it when I accidentally stumbled upon this nest of vipers. The world does not need this modern version of the pillory or stocks so the majority may rail against the differences of the minority. If we were all the same we would not be human. Please close down this disgusting and patently unecessary feature. I used to buy Glamour Magazine in the UK, not any more. There is nothing glamourous about sniping at innocent victims who cannot retaliate. Totally disgusted, ex consumer .Flag
-
26
Name: Barbara Miller on Sep 15, 2007Comments: I question the legality of taking snapshots of individuals and displaying those pictures on the internet without their knowledge. What if someone had been trying to hide from an abusive spouse and their picture (and thus location) was plastered all over the internet What of someone in the witness protection program Glamour magazine is violating personal privacy with this "Don't spotting" section. If Glamour was to continue this, wouldn't it be better to get the authorization of those being photographedFlag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2007Comments: hear hear! Please do something about that crap! You don't want to be on that page either, right!Flag
-
28
Name: LongHairFanatic on Sep 15, 2007Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2007Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Kim Blevins on Sep 15, 2007Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Irina on Sep 15, 2007Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Christine Mead on Sep 15, 2007Comments: Please remove this horrible feature from your site. It only breeds prejudice.Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Sep 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Sara Sasse on Sep 16, 2007Comments: The lack of aquired expressed consent for the posting of these photos is the specific reason why I do not purchase Glamour magazine anymore.Flag
-
35
Name: Rebecca on Sep 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Anonymous on Sep 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Melina Kajander on Sep 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Sep 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Gretchen Van Der Lyke on Sep 17, 2007Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2007Comments: I can't believe they'd publish such an articleFlag
-
41
Name: JL Griffis on Sep 17, 2007Comments: The 'Don't' feature is so inherently hurtful and mean that I can see no argument in favor of its continuance. Please end it. And APOLOGIZE to those who have been its victims!Flag
-
42
Name: Maria Andersson on Sep 17, 2007Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Brandi G. on Sep 17, 2007Comments: It's HORRIBLE to encourage nasty, petty, small minded, superficial people to go around and take photos of other people WITHOUT their permission and post them on a web site so they can be torn apart. Our world has enough segregation, racism, sexism and prejudice without glamour encouraging it. Your magazine is ridiculous!Flag
-
44
Name: Karen Springston on Sep 17, 2007Comments: I find this part of your website both in bad taste, and a major creator of hostility. I feel that posting shots of people without their permission is a violation of their right to privacy.Flag
-
45
Name: Sean on Sep 17, 2007Comments: What can you really expect from the type of people who read Glamour Apparently nothing more than putting down others to mask their own lack of substance and security.Flag
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2007Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Kalyra on Sep 18, 2007Comments: Please remove the Don't Spotting section, it is awful to read what people think when shown certain images and to see photos of people who have NOT signed an agreement to have their pics taken or published.Flag
-
48
Name: Leslie on Sep 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Anonymous on Sep 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Melissa P. on Sep 19, 2007Comments: The October issue really ticked me off. Hair scare I sincerely hope that lady sues you.Flag
Page: 1, 2