Signatures 40 total
Page: 1
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
9
Name: Francisco Vieira De Souza on Jun 26, 2006Comments: Among advantages we get: security, performance, portability, etc. What more we can getFlag
- 10
-
11
Name: J. Greg Davidson on Jun 27, 2006Comments: Need standard way to designate where (if anywhere) GC will be used (on which types) with which algorithm (one of which should be "realtime", i.e. no collection pauses). Also need a standard way to require end-call optimization to allow for efficient modular state machines.Flag
- 12
-
13
Name: German Diago Gomez on Jul 3, 2006Comments: I've seen a pre-berlin 2006 meeting proposal to add garbage collection from Hans Boehm. I don't know if this proposal is still being considered but I think it should be in the language as an optional part, specially with that kind of control in which you can enclose with { } and use #pragma gc to totally control how much garbage collected code you want. This feature, with some good library additions like threads and sockets would make c++ rock. I think it would also be useful (but it's not being considered for c++0x) to have optional reflection in c++0x, with the #pragma and {} style to be able to exactly control the amount of reflection you want. With these features c++ would be used for many tasks for which today it is not being used.Flag
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
21
Name: Boqcxzj Oareundj on May 30, 2007Comments: yefixwmzn ujdwaiehf mejhygcw ntzuwf varbuzl xjfywub cuginbrFlag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Aug 12, 2007Comments: It'd be nice. I'm going to do it anyway for myself if you don't... but some help would be appreciated.Flag
-
23
Name: Khaled Jamoos on Aug 15, 2007Comments: please add it even if it was a special compiler distributionFlag
-
24
Name: Emily on Nov 15, 2007Comments: hello im emily postma i love to eat cuz im a fat stupid pop face RAWRFlag
-
25
Name: Eva Kakou on Nov 18, 2007Comments: yeah a c++ Garbage collector with option of doing it manually when one wishes to.Flag
- 26
-
27
Name: Nguyen on Feb 9, 2008Comments: Yes, too many crashes to be exceptable in a large C++ app even the programmer is an expert C++.Flag
- 28
- 29
-
30
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2008Comments: I've been using the Boehm GC for all my C++ programs. It makes it much more enjoyable and productive to program in C++.Flag
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
-
38
Name: Ingo Elsen on Nov 19, 2009Comments: And if it were only for the sake of neutralizing the major argument of Java evangelistsFlag
-
39
Name: Adam on Dec 5, 2009Comments: Memory management is a good idea. In C++ we could still manipulate memory where needed, but not have tp perform the delete. Maybe we could have the choice to delete memory whenever we wanted (provided its safe), but if we dont, then then the garbage collector would automatically perform the clean up. So we still have the choice to do a delete when WE want to, but if and only if we forget, then the garbage collector will perform the delete. Doing it this way would not break existing code.Flag
-
40
Name: Sándor Orosz on Jul 21, 2011Comments: Programming in C++ is much easier and more productive with a garbage collector. Manual memory management is cumbersome and possibility of memory leaks and related errors arise easily. Leaving out garbage collection from C++0x is a short-sighted decision. C++ should have only optional manual memory management, since real-time applications are far outnumbered by applications that could benefit from garbage collectionFlag
Page: 1