Petition to save Whin Park

Signatures 43 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Anne Thomas on Dec 4, 2011

   Comments: Please spend more money on cycle paths and buses to cut congestion instead

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Per Fischer on Dec 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: John West on Dec 8, 2011

   Comments: I agree and the Inverness Civic Trust policy is to suport the route from Dores Roundabout to the A82 via Torvean Quarry by whatever means, failing this, the status quo

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: John Wood on Dec 8, 2011

   Comments: For once I agree with the Scottish Government. Scrap this destructive white elephant now

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Alison Lowe on Dec 8, 2011

   Comments: It is certainly worth the Highland Council taking a little more time to revisit the options and also the necessity for the west link to the A82. It seems the public are not being made actively aware of all the reasons given for the west link and therefore are not in a position of making informed decisions when being consulted.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Frances Grant on Dec 8, 2011

   Comments: I think that Highland Council should be ashamed of themselves for even considering using Common Good land for the purpose of building a road. This is not in the spirit of 'common good' Please rethink and use 'common sense' by including an additional option of 'no west road'

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Jason Rose on Dec 9, 2011

   Comments: Well said and good luck Friends of the Earth! I recently blogged about this very issue: http://green-dad.blogspot.com/2011/12/whens-bypass-not-bypass.html

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Peter Elbourne on Dec 9, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Kevin Macdonald on Dec 9, 2011

   Comments: totally agree ,its an absolute disgrace fro the council to try and railroad this plan through,all the councillors care about is opening up more land for development and seem to be quite happy to ruin the last beautiful green space that families can enjoy in our city .the noise and pollution drifting on to our children is unthinkable

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Kevin Macdonald on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: George Macpherson on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Alan Shepard on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Martin Sherring on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Sam Newmark on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Karin Kremer on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments: please use the money to develop public transport and cycle paths instead. We need Whin Park and the playing fields.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Frank Kremer on Dec 9, 2011

    Comments: Don't sacrifice Whin Park and Bught Park!

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2011

    Comments: The centre of Inverness was badly damaged in the 1960s by lack of forethought. The few remaining places which make Inverness worth staying more than 30mins, if you are a tourist, in are all associated with the river. Also, Whin park gives a much needed park are for those who live in Inverness. If the council does not have the money, at the moment, to build a bridge in the best and most expensive place, then they must hold off until they do. Do not make the same mistake as was made in the 1960s, Invernessians will have to live with what you do forever. If there is a problem with too much traffic, then stop the building which is all being bought be people outwith the area. Also, prioritize the building of bicycle tracks. Use what cash is available to do this and leave the idea of any further bridges either completely or until the very best and most expensive option can be done.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Cathy Kay on Dec 10, 2011

    Comments: Why should roads be more important than people and destroy one of the most picturesque spots in Inverness - just look at how ugly the distributor road is.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: David Somerville on Dec 11, 2011

    Comments: i agree with the above

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Catriona Ross on Dec 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Sheila Wickens on Dec 12, 2011

    Comments: Whin park is such a great resource - it would be a tragedy to diminish this.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Ailsa Laing Lochend Park on Dec 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Maggie Fyffe on Dec 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Jill Thomson on Dec 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Davie Newton on Dec 13, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Louise Smith on Dec 13, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: GALE FALCONER on Dec 17, 2011

    Comments: Please do not interfere with both the rugby pitches and Whin Park. Both these areas are crucial to Inverness residents wellbeing.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Lesley Carloss on Dec 28, 2011

    Comments: I entirely agree and voiced my opinion on the original public 'consultation' sent out. As usual, they had already decided that a bypass should be built - that was not under discussion. Short sighted, uninspired and behind the times.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: JOHN CRAIG on Jan 4, 2012

    Comments: TOTALLY IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS OPTION; THAT IT IS NOT THERE,HIGHLIGHTS COUNCIL'S MIND MADE UP ALREADY.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Christopher Piras on Jan 7, 2012

    Comments: i'm not sure where it is but i don't agree for anything to be built on anything widely used

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: John Craig on Jan 12, 2012

    Comments: Already signed this petition, but were you aware that 75% of all canal traffic through Tomnahurich bridge is generated by Caley Cruisers so probably about 50% of bridge swings. Option 8 Caley Cruisers re-locate to Torvean Quarry which is Council owned and already excavated to a depth greater than the Canal.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Irene Brandt on Jan 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Sharon Jallow on Jan 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Julian Paren on Jan 13, 2012

    Comments: This road has no strategic benefit and the case for it has not been argued coherently. Developers are hoping to make money to the detriment of those who enjoy the open spaces of the city.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Sean Kenna on Jan 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Carlos on May 4, 2012

    Comments: I am incredibly graetful to CASE for their success and continuing work opposing the 4 4 semester schedule in our high school. The 4 4 semester plan was a terrible idea. But CASE's current Take7 Teach5 petition goes beyond opposition to a semesterized schedule. It advocates reducing the courseload from 8 to 7 classes, which is an entirely different issue. Many people who signed the petition seemed to think they are supporting the end of semesterization when in fact they are supporting cutting our kids' opportunities to take electives. Perhaps they are unaware that kids who feel that 8 classes leaves them insufficient family time may choose to take 7 classes and a study hall, which still earns more than the 26 credits required for an advanced degree.AHS is running an 8 class yearlong schedule this year which is working very well for my child. CASE, and Ned Gallaway, please focus on keeping our core classes year-long. Don't take away my child's electives. Mr. Gallaway, you say you support the arts. If CASE succeeds in mandating 7 classes for our kids, my child *will* drop out of chorus next year. She doesn't want that. Is that really what you want?I quote the beginning of CASE's petition: Whereas the eight period high school schedule adopted by Albemarle County Schools in 2010 has had the following negative consequences:- increased student workloads, which reduces family time and inhibits the development of the whole child; - decreased total instructional time by approximately 10% per course;

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Myvgcoqe on May 4, 2012

    Comments: VFbMi7 mwzykzouaqin

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Marchelle on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Teach us, Lord to serve You as You deserve, to give and not count the cost, to fight and not to heed the wunods, to toil and not to seek for rest, to labor and not to ask for any reward save that of knowing that we do Your will. Amen

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Hobzrje on May 5, 2012

    Comments: 2YhwOq , lcroynbejopi, zdfehdrgahsn, http://gdpxjcztflzg.com/

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Qftoqhum on May 6, 2012

    Comments: gyz1Y4 breirzmavpeu

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Somnath on May 7, 2012

    Comments: 22fI am commenting to let you undnrstaed what a helpful discovery our princess undergone using your site. She learned a wide variety of things, not to mention what it is like to have a great teaching mindset to make certain people with ease learn a variety of grueling matters. You actually did more than people's desires. Thank you for producing those informative, trusted, edifying and as well as unique thoughts on this topic to Tanya.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Floppi on May 7, 2012

    Comments: 1afCongratulations on possessing ceitnraly one among one of the vital refined blogs Ive arrive across in some time! Its simply amazing how much youe28099ll have the ability to take into account away from a factor basically simply due to how visually beautiful it is. Youve place collectively a fantastic blog website house e28093nice graphics, movies, layout. That is ceitnraly a should-see website!

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Iwjwrykojex on May 7, 2012

    Comments: GEHDrN , mszzxatxoxcb, uqabqoomnfol, http://gfpltkwsoang.com/

    Flag

Page: 1