appeal bakers seven weeks its a disgrace

Signatures 48 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Crannypete on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: get stuffed afl appeal it sainters

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Luke on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: An absolute witchhunt on the St.Kilda Football Club by the AFL to cover up the fact they had nothing on Baker but wanted to appear as though they are doing something! WRONG DECISION!! They should have bought Farmer some glasses instead! :(

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Darren on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: This is the most disgusting result I've ever heard. Johnson's incident was way worser, but Baker got more weeks without video evidence! You're a joke, AFL.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Chris on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: C'mon Archie - fire up on this one. Take every avenue of appeal that we can. You were big and strong when you stood up to the local council, now lets all stand up to the AFL.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Ben O'Donnell on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Darren Clifford on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: Aborrent decision by the AFL.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Megan Neal on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: If nobody saw it, how can he go for longer than the Collingwood player who basically knocked the block of that young Melbourne player. Something fishy always happens when we play Freo, don't let Bakes be the latest saga!

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Hayden Putz on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Martin EPIS on Aug 21, 2007

   Comments: As a Police Officer of 18 years experience I cannot believe the pathetic way the AFL Tribunal is run and managed. What a farce.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Josh on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: very pissed of about the incident should get 4-5 weeks not 7

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: Give the saints a fair go for once.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Ric Mauger on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: The Commission members should hang thier heads in shame, a crime without evidence is no crime at all.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Grant Thomas on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: Disgrace

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Archie Fraser on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: We will not rest, we will take this as far as possible. Do not fear Saints fans. Keep the Faith!

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Mark Jones on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: How can any justice system prove someone so guilty with such little evidence to support their decision. DISGRACE!!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Damien Sackville on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: The AFL is an absolute disgrace. The tribunal openly admitted that Steven Baker was convicted based upon his own testimony that he stopped and Jeff Farmer smashed into the back of him. Farcical and Non-sensical.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Angela on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Darren Parkin on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Nick Splitter on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: The tribunal is an absolute joke. A fair dinkum disgrace suspending a player for one week - let alone seven - on the evidence at hand, If the evidence proved that Steven Baker hit Jeff Farmer, or engaged in unduly rough play, then fine, he deserves punishment. Fact is, there was NO evidence beyond a biased club official, against Steven Baker. Plenty of people said they saw Farmer running towards Baker, and ONE person says Baker hit him, then CHANGES his story to say his view was obstucted. How can you possibly be suspended at all on this evidence!

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Renee Raknes on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: The AFL is a disgrace.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Sleazebag on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: no comment

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Roger Sidhom on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: FREE STEVEN BAKER

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Paul Rodgers on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: What has happened is an absolute joke! Should have got a St Kilda official to say Farmer tripped over his own feet and broke his own nose when he hit the ground...

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Killa Gram on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Jeff Farmer on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: It didn't even hurt. I hit my wife harder.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Joe Saitta on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: Outrageous, appalling decision. I am fast losing faith and interest in this clearly corrupt organisation, that doesn't understand the concept of an even playing field.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Jared on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: Another prime example of astounding inconsistency and unpredictability in the tribunal system this year.... what did they do, draw a decision out of a hat without actually considering they didn't have any proven evidence to base it on

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Dan Taylor on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Robert D on Aug 21, 2007

    Comments: Disgraceful decision. What a farce.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Steve Green on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: Free Bakes!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: Your petition is weak as piss. It might have some merit if you didn't put Farmer probably deserved it. Farmer is a king. Baker couldn't play fair, so took him out. Why don't the tribunal believe Baker Oh, because he's always hitting blokes behind play. KARMA ! Saints have shit players, shit supporters and are a shit club.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: P. Yeshua on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: It's about time some stood up and defended the injustices enacted against Jim Bakker. The money and those girls were planted. He had nothing to do with any of it and the liberal media should be ashamed of themselves for what they did to the good man's name. I support this petition whole heartedly.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Pina Avellino on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: Absolutely disgraceful descision

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Larry on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: outrage, an outrage i say!

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: Absolute joke! Outrageous!

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: All St Kilda supporters and AFL supporters in want is some kind of consistency. Barry Hall "on camera but off the ball" played in a Grand Final Selwood didn't call Healand's daughter a slut and Headland didn't hit Selwood according to the tribunal. Get around the ground cameras!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: All St Kilda supporters and AFL supporters in want is some kind of consistency. Barry Hall "on camera but off the ball" played in a Grand Final Selwood didn't call Healand's daughter a slut and Headland didn't hit Selwood according to the tribunal. Get around the ground cameras!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Ferg Tremaine on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: The AFL is a complete disgrace!

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Simon Brennan on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Nicholas Cooley on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: Disgrace of a decision. No evidence other than Baker getting hit inn the bak of HIS head. So he apparently is an amazing fighter and could head butt someone who is behind him!! All witness say FARMER sprinted towards baker How is this 7 weeks No one saw the contact NO ONE!!

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: DAN on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: disgusting

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Saintsfan on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Heath on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Heath on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Nathan on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments: Innocent until proven guilty AFL!

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Tanneal on Aug 22, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1