Drop Charges Against Scott Demuth!

Signatures 1873 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 38 › »

1. 1
   Name: Suzanne Link on Nov 20, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Julian Coupat on Nov 20, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Nanette Echols on Nov 21, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Leigh Meryhew on Nov 21, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Kelsey Fitzgerald on Nov 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Kelly on Nov 24, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Vania Brightman Cox on Dec 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Enid Logan on Dec 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Raphi Rechitsky on Dec 2, 2009

   Comments: Bogus law, bogus charges.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: David Pellow on Dec 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Brook Bernini on Dec 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Sara Nelson on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Michele Rockne on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: This is a deplorable state of affairs - the AETA must be abandoned, as should other legal instruments that criminalize first amendment activities. Clear Scott of the charges now!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Nathan Clough on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Dr Mary Gilmartin on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Hulya Arik on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Peter North on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: it is crucial that academics are able to research protest groups and events safely and ethically without imperilling themselves or those with whom they research. It is a principle of freedom of speech and of association.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Mark Jackson on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: David Faust on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Marthe S. on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Lachlan Barber on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Amy Mills on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: Protecting the confidentiality of informants protects research participants, and also makes research possible. Furthermore, it is required of researchers by the Institutional Review Boards of our universities.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Sallie Marston on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Dr. Nik Heynen on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Nicholas Crane on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: It is my belief that the charges again Scott Demuth should be dismissed. This does not necessarily reflect any sympathy for his research participants. Rather, I believe this is crucial to ensuring the integrity of academic institutions in the United States. The ability to keep sources anonymous allows for important research to be done. It must be protected.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: Regardless of how one feels about radical environmental politics, the anonymity of our sources is one of the bedrocks of academics research and must be protected. Indeed, it is required by both British and American Sociological Associations. Scott Demuth was merely abiding by these ethical codes and all charges against him should be dropped. It would be astonishing for the US federal grand jury to breach the principles academic freedom by convicting Scott of a criminal offence.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Sophie Bond on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Mark De Socio on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: Assistant Professor, Salisbury University

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Dr. Leslie Kern on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Stephen Boatright on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Matthew L. Mitchelson on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Charlotte Lee on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Dr Tamsin Davies on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Jennifer Casolo on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Nikos Kourampas on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Graham Pickren on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Cathryn Watson on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Jung Won Sonn on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Laura-Anne Minkoff-Zern on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Steve McFarland on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: CUNY Graduate Center

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Liana Vasseur on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anna Waldstein on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Mitchell Snider on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments: My primary concern is with the protection of academic freedom and integrity. This student should not be pressured to reveal any information he might have (and it is equally possible he has none) acquired in the context of academic research which assures participants confidentiality and anonymity.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Ben Kohl on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Daniel Naud on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Eli Meyerhoff on Dec 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 38 › »