Signatures 26 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Anonymous on Jul 25, 2007Comments: Dear New York Times: Get over yourself.Flag
-
2
Name: Briana on Jul 25, 2007Comments: It's stupid and childish, bending your back to suffice everyone else. As someone else said - get over yourselves.Flag
-
3
Name: Justine on Jul 25, 2007Comments: While the Harry Potter books may be classified as children's books anyone who's ever read them knows that the label of children's book is inappropriate. This is a book for all ages, I know just as many, if not more, adults who read them as children. You don't sell 8.3 million copies of a book to just children.Flag
-
4
Name: Karin Pissoort on Jul 25, 2007Comments: I am 48 and have utterly enjoyed the entire HP series for their deep psychological insight in Life and Death and Love. When I look around me in daily life, I only see adults reading the books on train and subway...please get realFlag
-
5
Name: Sarah on Jul 25, 2007Comments: Free Harry Potter !Flag
-
6
Name: Janine on Jul 25, 2007Comments: The fact that the greatest books of our generation have been demoted by the New York Times is pathetic and infuriating. Give Harry and JKR their rightful due.Flag
-
7
Name: Joel Edwards on Jul 25, 2007Comments: Its a great piece of work. For Adults aswell as children.Flag
-
8
Name: Josh on Jul 25, 2007Comments: New York Times = Daily ProphetFlag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Jul 25, 2007Comments: Even if Harry Potter began as a children's book, the readers grew up with the books. Confining HP to a "Children's" list not only conveniently side steps allowing the books their rightful position atop the best seller list, it also takes a shot at the incredible number of adults that enjoy the series. NY Times best seller list should be an accurate reflection of the best selling books of the day, not the books publishers WANT the public to read.Flag
-
10
Name: Kristin on Jul 25, 2007Comments: As an over-40 avid reader, I find it comical that the NY Times would believe Harry Potter books would do so well selling to children. My husband and I both purchased copies of book 7 for ourselves. Ironically, Danielle Steel is on the list - an author I read in my teens.Flag
-
11
Name: Jennifer on Jul 25, 2007Comments: I would love to see Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows on the Bestseller List. It is a book that thrills both children and adults alike while examining complex themes and motifs layered beneath the simple story of a boy wizard's quest to vanquish his enemy.Flag
-
12
Name: Tanya on Jul 25, 2007Comments: Free Harry Potter!! Let the bestseller list actually reflect the best sellers.Flag
-
13
Name: Shelby on Jul 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Becca on Jul 25, 2007Comments: The New York Times is a joke! Deathly Hallows is the best selling book at the minute and will be for a long time, so it should be number one on the bestsellers' list! Anyone with eyes that work properly can see that Harry Potter isn't just for children.Flag
-
15
Name: Amy on Jul 25, 2007Comments: Change it before it's too late, you *insert one of the many expletives found within the HP books here*Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Jul 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Alex on Jul 27, 2007Comments: DO IT!Flag
-
18
Name: Brian on Jul 27, 2007Comments: Free Harry PotterFlag
-
19
Name: Jeanne on Jul 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Mark on Jul 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Albus Dumbledore on Jul 27, 2007Comments: Dear New York TImes: Try for some REMORSEFlag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Jul 28, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Joshua Matthews on Aug 3, 2007Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Aug 14, 2007Comments: The bestsellers list should reflect what sells the best. End of discussion.Flag
-
25
Name: Amy McKinley on Aug 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Nele on Apr 20, 2008Comments:Flag
Page: 1