Signatures 94 total
Page: 1, 2
-
51
Name: John Cherniga on Apr 12, 2009Comments: Do the right thing!Flag
-
52
Name: Lisbeth West on Apr 15, 2009Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Jane Smith on Apr 15, 2009Comments:Flag
-
54
Name: Anonymous on Apr 15, 2009Comments:Flag
-
55
Name: Anonymous on Apr 15, 2009Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Melanie Redman on Apr 19, 2009Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Joy Hernandez on Apr 29, 2009Comments: This is wrong on so many levels. This woman as suffered enough in her life. If this action gives her peace, then by God give her peace.Flag
-
58
Name: Thorsten Denk on May 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
59
Name: Torbjörn Källström on May 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Yinteck on May 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Alice Tan on May 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: Kevin Ferrara on May 16, 2009Comments: IFlag
-
63
Name: Britt Garrison on May 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Edward Comelab on May 16, 2009Comments: "But that educational purpose could just as easily be achieved by displaying high-quality reproductions of the paintings, while returning the originals to their creator and rightful owner."Flag
-
65
Name: Anonymous on May 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
66
Name: Thomas Arthur Smith on May 17, 2009Comments: give back her work.Flag
-
67
Name: Shirley Young on May 17, 2009Comments: Why not buy one or two, then release the rest to her and show good quality prints for the rest Perhaps in return for Dina making a film telling of what happened Would that be fair and respect history while giving the artist back her rightsFlag
-
68
Name: Sidharth Chaturvedi on May 17, 2009Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Nadia Stadnycki on May 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Quike Garcia on May 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Anonymous on May 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Anonymous on May 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
73
Name: Anonymous on May 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
74
Name: Brandon Long on May 19, 2009Comments: is the museum educating or gloating over possession Too often it is that one who is NOT an artist nor capable to be, profits from of an actual artist. Meanwhile the artists rights lay dormant.... hats off to you sinners* mia culpaFlag
-
75
Name: John Patterson on May 20, 2009Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: Jens Claessens on May 21, 2009Comments:Flag
-
77
Name: Anonymous on May 23, 2009Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Anonymous on May 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
79
Name: Troy Walton on Jun 17, 2009Comments: Let her have the originals. The museum can hang prints.Flag
-
80
Name: Linda Rogers on Jun 30, 2009Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: Timothy Gorski on Aug 3, 2009Comments: My ancestors were Polish. It is a disgrace that this museum in Poland continues to hold these original items of artwork instead of returning them to their rightful owner(s). It is even more of a shame that now, if the museum ever does the right thing, that Dina will have died without having the satisfaction of knowing that justice was done.Flag
-
82
Name: Laura Montalbano on Aug 18, 2009Comments: her family should have her painting so they can keep her alive though her work. her family for generations will remember what she went through by touching her paintings and then her spirit can truely be free from her captures.Flag
-
83
Name: Craig Stiles on Aug 29, 2009Comments:Flag
-
84
Name: Leslie Auerbach on Sep 8, 2009Comments:Flag
-
85
Name: Rob Zvaleko on Sep 8, 2009Comments:Flag
-
86
Name: Trudy Baxter on Sep 25, 2009Comments:Flag
-
87
Name: Sally Clark on Oct 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: Tammie Carey on Oct 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Anonymous on Dec 9, 2009Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Anonymous on Jan 4, 2010Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: Mxbqbt on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: Ellen Stiefler on Aug 23, 2010Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Cat Corliss on Jan 27, 2011Comments: Please do the right thing! Return Dina's paintings to her daughters and granddaughters so that they can cherish and admire their beloved mother and grandmother's works of historical art.Flag
-
94
Name: Kirsten O'Brien on May 19, 2011Comments: Nothing about this case is complex or difficult to understand. The work of Dina's hands remains her work, even when done under threat of death or torture. She did not give these paintings freely, and from what I understand, worked as slowly on them as possible to keep the subjects alive as long as possible using the only power she had. The museum may display copies (as it already does), but the work of Dina's hands should go to her daughters. To keep these paintings is to say that her suffering, her efforts to do what little she could to preserve life, her pain, was not her own, but belonged to someone else who had, somehow, the right to sell them to a museum for display. This is barbaric. You know as well as I do that none of the work done by enslaved hands belongs to any but the workers themselves, and you should know better than to continue to claim that the law supports your selfishness.Flag
Page: 1, 2