Free Bruce Robinson

Signatures 2288 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 43, 44, 45, 46

1. 2251
   Name: Keith Brown on Feb 22, 2007

   Comments: Bruce Robinson must be freed on bail immediately. The Polish Government should not allow this injustice to occur.

   Flag
2. 2252
   Name: Karolina Sutton on Feb 23, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 2253
   Name: Shayne Sutton on Feb 23, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 2254
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 23, 2007

   Comments: I wholeheartedly support this petition

   Flag
5. 2255
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 2256
   Name: Beverley Lorne Brown on Feb 24, 2007

   Comments: New Zealand Chartered Accountant

   Flag
7. 2257
   Name: Magdalena Gibney on Feb 25, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 2258
   Name: Karen Brunton on Feb 25, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 2259
   Name: Bryan Brunton on Feb 25, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 2260
    Name: Bryan Surgenor on Feb 25, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 2261
    Name: Grae Crowder on Feb 25, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 2262
    Name: Chad Bartz on Feb 25, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 2263
    Name: Simon Dick on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 2264
    Name: Lisa Murray on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments: All the best Bruce to you, your family and susporters!!

    Flag
15. 2265
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments: Free Bruce Robinson!

    Flag
16. 2266
    Name: Lance Welch on Feb 28, 2007

    Comments: Bruce is a nice guy and I do not believe he would be negligent in any way.

    Flag
17. 2267
    Name: Birgitte Lundebye on Feb 28, 2007

    Comments: Good luck Bruce, I pray for you!

    Flag
18. 2268
    Name: Glenn Tubb on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 2269
    Name: Mark Mcbride on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments: Free him

    Flag
20. 2270
    Name: Rodney Hawthorn on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 2271
    Name: J Lindridge on Mar 7, 2007

    Comments: Good Luck

    Flag
22. 2272
    Name: Audrey Scott on Mar 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 2273
    Name: Abigail Smith on Mar 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 2274
    Name: Claire Holland on Mar 16, 2007

    Comments: I am a NZ CA - I am disgusted by Bruce's treatment and cannot believe the New Zealand government cannot do more.

    Flag
25. 2275
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 17, 2007

    Comments: Jacek Suchocki 2006.03.13 41-407 Imielin ul.Wyzwolenia 62A tel.fax. 0048 (32) 2257025 email :jsuchocki1@tlen.pl James Edward Fagan III Help for foreign victims of Katowice MPT roof collapse (january 2006) (send please this text to lawyers,representing victims of this tragedy ) I/m retired journalist and one year I investigate problem of collapse MTK building ( in Katowice in 28 Jannuary 2006 ).I was present at many trials and addittonally I corresponded to Polish Buiding Ministry. Actually,claims of vicims/s families and injureds amount above 12 milions złotych ( about 4 milions USD). Finnally,sum of compensations vill be of course multiple more. My (after lawyers consultations) motion is follow: “Main responsible for this collapse (in 80-90 % ) are local State Building inspectors so State Administration. and Polish authorities will have to pay compensations in this percentage.” Motivation: In the end of December 2005 and in beginning of Jannuary 2006 on the roofs in Silesia in poland too ,lied enormal layer of ice-snow.The pressure on roofs was twice (and more) above maximal admissible.!!!!(it was opinions of two polytechnics ) It was character of natural disaster and buiding authorities ought to handle it very seriously. In December 2005 and in first days of Jannuary 2006 broke down about 17 big roofs in Silesia and in all Poland territorry.Those were roofs of markets,s stores,sporthalls,factories(those collapses did not provoke death victims,because they happened on nights or when buildinds were empty) In winter 2005-2006 (December-march) collapsed 72 big roofs under icesnow pressure in Poland. Then,in the beggining of Jannuary 2006 Building state Inspectors (so the best building inginners)had (under penalty of the law): TO CLOSE ALL BIG AREA BUIDINGS till take away this deaths,s dangerous ice snow layer.!!! In polish Building Law exists many law articles about building inspectors duties.: -2- article 69.1 (duty of buiding inspector to remove danger for life or health ) article.68 (like art.69) article.89.c(duty for local administratio to remove danger and to force buiding inspectors for activity) penalty article:95.pt.3:( is under law responsibillity,who didn,t prewent danger from buiding) -article for building inspectors. I/m not lawyer and my knowledge is limited,but I think those informations are sufficiently. I was present at many trials about this cataastrophe and newr lawyers did not raise a subject of guilty of polish buiding administration in this tragedy,and MTK is approved as only guilty.!!!! In a case of effectively use of my suggestions J/d like to profit 1 % from payment from state administration. Additionally,I inform,that till actuality, polish building ministry did not introduce law modifications,to pevent tragedys like MTK collapse. Yours sincerely Jacek Suchocki Confirm please.by fax or email.

    Flag
26. 2276
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 17, 2007

    Comments: Jacek Suchocki 2006.03.13 41-407 Imielin ul.Wyzwolenia 62A tel.fax. 0048 (32) 2257025 email :jsuchocki1@tlen.pl James Edward Fagan III Help for foreign victims of Katowice MPT roof collapse (january 2006) (send please this text to lawyers,representing victims of this tragedy ) I/m retired journalist and one year I investigate problem of collapse MTK building ( in Katowice in 28 Jannuary 2006 ).I was present at many trials and addittonally I corresponded to Polish Buiding Ministry. Actually,claims of vicims/s families and injureds amount above 12 milions złotych ( about 4 milions USD). Finnally,sum of compensations vill be of course multiple more. My (after lawyers consultations) motion is follow: “Main responsible for this collapse (in 80-90 % ) are local State Building inspectors so State Administration. and Polish authorities will have to pay compensations in this percentage.” Motivation: In the end of December 2005 and in beginning of Jannuary 2006 on the roofs in Silesia in poland too ,lied enormal layer of ice-snow.The pressure on roofs was twice (and more) above maximal admissible.!!!!(it was opinions of two polytechnics ) It was character of natural disaster and buiding authorities ought to handle it very seriously. In December 2005 and in first days of Jannuary 2006 broke down about 17 big roofs in Silesia and in all Poland territorry.Those were roofs of markets,s stores,sporthalls,factories(those collapses did not provoke death victims,because they happened on nights or when buildinds were empty) In winter 2005-2006 (December-march) collapsed 72 big roofs under icesnow pressure in Poland. Then,in the beggining of Jannuary 2006 Building state Inspectors (so the best building inginners)had (under penalty of the law): TO CLOSE ALL BIG AREA BUIDINGS till take away this deaths,s dangerous ice snow layer.!!! In polish Building Law exists many law articles about building inspectors duties.: -2- article 69.1 (duty of buiding inspector to remove danger for life or health ) article.68 (like art.69) article.89.c(duty for local administratio to remove danger and to force buiding inspectors for activity) penalty article:95.pt.3:( is under law responsibillity,who didn,t prewent danger from buiding) -article for building inspectors. I/m not lawyer and my knowledge is limited,but I think those informations are sufficiently. I was present at many trials about this cataastrophe and newr lawyers did not raise a subject of guilty of polish buiding administration in this tragedy,and MTK is approved as only guilty.!!!! In a case of effectively use of my suggestions J/d like to profit 1 % from payment from state administration. Additionally,I inform,that till actuality, polish building ministry did not introduce law modifications,to pevent tragedys like MTK collapse. Yours sincerely Jacek Suchocki Confirm please.by fax or email.

    Flag
27. 2277
    Name: Jacek Suchocki Journalist on Mar 17, 2007

    Comments: S end this tekst to mr.Bruce Robinson please.Jacek Suchocki 2006.03.13 41-407 Imielin ul.Wyzwolenia 62A tel.fax. 0048 (32) 2257025 email :jsuchocki1@tlen.pl James Edward Fagan III Help for foreign victims of Katowice MPT roof collapse (january 2006) (send please this text to lawyers,representing victims of this tragedy ) I/m retired journalist and one year I investigate problem of collapse MTK building ( in Katowice in 28 Jannuary 2006 ).I was present at many trials and addittonally I corresponded to Polish Buiding Ministry. Actually,claims of vicims/s families and injureds amount above 12 milions złotych ( about 4 milions USD). Finnally,sum of compensations vill be of course multiple more. My (after lawyers consultations) motion is follow: “Main responsible for this collapse (in 80-90 % ) are local State Building inspectors so State Administration. and Polish authorities will have to pay compensations in this percentage.” Motivation: In the end of December 2005 and in beginning of Jannuary 2006 on the roofs in Silesia in poland too ,lied enormal layer of ice-snow.The pressure on roofs was twice (and more) above maximal admissible.!!!!(it was opinions of two polytechnics ) It was character of natural disaster and buiding authorities ought to handle it very seriously. In December 2005 and in first days of Jannuary 2006 broke down about 17 big roofs in Silesia and in all Poland territorry.Those were roofs of markets,s stores,sporthalls,factories(those collapses did not provoke death victims,because they happened on nights or when buildinds were empty) In winter 2005-2006 (December-march) collapsed 72 big roofs under icesnow pressure in Poland. Then,in the beggining of Jannuary 2006 Building state Inspectors (so the best building inginners)had (under penalty of the law): TO CLOSE ALL BIG AREA BUIDINGS till take away this deaths,s dangerous ice snow layer.!!! In polish Building Law exists many law articles about building inspectors duties.: -2- article 69.1 (duty of buiding inspector to remove danger for life or health ) article.68 (like art.69) article.89.c(duty for local administratio to remove danger and to force buiding inspectors for activity) penalty article:95.pt.3:( is under law responsibillity,who didn,t prewent danger from buiding) -article for building inspectors. I/m not lawyer and my knowledge is limited,but I think those informations are sufficiently. I was present at many trials about this cataastrophe and newr lawyers did not raise a subject of guilty of polish buiding administration in this tragedy,and MTK is approved as only guilty.!!!! In a case of effectively use of my suggestions J/d like to profit 1 % from payment from state administration. Additionally,I inform,that till actuality, polish building ministry did not introduce law modifications,to pevent tragedys like MTK collapse. Yours sincerely Jacek Suchocki Confirm please.by fax or email.

    Flag
28. 2278
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments: I am thorougly appalled, hearing of this situation, in the actions of the Polish courts, and the lack of intervention of the New Zealand government. As a native New Zealander, it truly rattles my faith in my own government to protect its citizens from basic human rights violations.

    Flag
29. 2279
    Name: Deborah Weston CA on Apr 11, 2007

    Comments: Poland should be ashamed of itself for having such a poor justice system. The UK & the EU should not tolerate this kind of inhume treatment of a person. The NZ Govt must do something for his kids sake.

    Flag
30. 2280
    Name: Deborah Weston on Apr 11, 2007

    Comments: Poland's justice system is appauling. Bruce has not been convicted and has been treated like a caged animnal. Why is Poland partof the EU with this kind of third world justice system

    Flag
31. 2281
    Name: Matt on Apr 16, 2007

    Comments: i wouldn't like polish sausage

    Flag
32. 2282
    Name: Andy Long on Apr 20, 2007

    Comments: This travesty must end. A terrible tragedy is not made better by ruining the lives of innocent law-abiding people

    Flag
33. 2283
    Name: Deniz Karadeniz on Jul 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 2284
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 2, 2007

    Comments: We let all their immigrants come to our country, and for what This!!!

    Flag
35. 2285
    Name: Michael Zabow on Apr 24, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 2286
    Name: Lucy Walsh on Sep 24, 2008

    Comments: This is an awful situation. At the very least, Bruce should have had access to clean, adequate prison conditions which do not infringe upon his human rights.

    Flag
37. 2287
    Name: Upynpv on Feb 4, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 2288
    Name: Buy Cheap OEM Software on Mar 9, 2012

    Comments: 6SBAUA Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 43, 44, 45, 46