Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 2,200

 

# NameComments
2151 Pete JenkinsLooks to me like a corrupt and incompetent beaurocracy is trying to a make scapegoat out of Bruce. He has received scandalous treatment.
2152 Martin Horatz
2153 Lia NichollsBeing held under such conditions without a trial is simply crazy.
2154 Lia NichollsBeing held under such conditions without a trial is simply crazy.
2155 Danielle Green
2156 Danny BoyleBruce Robinson should be released on bail and - if prosecutors still want to press charges - given a trial date so he can properly defend himself.
2157 Anonymous
2158 AnonymousNZICA member
2159 Gretchen Wilson
2160 Rachel LewisFree Bruce
2161 Martin HoratzFree Bruce!
2162 AnonymousRetired Member of NZ Society of Accountants.
2163 Julia Mohr
2164 AnonymousJust got back from a 4 year stint in Warsaw. All Gvt systems there funtion on minimum resources and maximum beauracracy. Took me 3 months to get a 6 month visa. Very frustrating. As for accountability, they will have to nail someone for the Katowice tragedy. Sounds like they original engineers and architects will have a lot to answer for.
2165 Keith BrownBruce Robinson must be freed on bail immediately. The Polish Government should not allow this injustice to occur.
2166 Karolina Sutton
2167 Shayne Sutton
2168 AnonymousI wholeheartedly support this petition
2169 Anonymous
2170 Beverley Lorne BrownNew Zealand Chartered Accountant
2171 Magdalena Gibney
2172 Karen Brunton
2173 Bryan Brunton
2174 Bryan Surgenor
2175 Grae Crowder
2176 Chad Bartz
2177 Simon Dick
2178 Lisa MurrayAll the best Bruce to you, your family and susporters!!
2179 AnonymousFree Bruce Robinson!
2180 Lance WelchBruce is a nice guy and I do not believe he would be negligent in any way.
2181 Birgitte LundebyeGood luck Bruce, I pray for you!
2182 Glenn Tubb
2183 mark mcbrideFree him
2184 Rodney Hawthorn
2185 J LindridgeGood Luck
2186 audrey scott
2187 abigail smith
2188 Claire hollandI am a NZ CA - I am disgusted by Bruce's treatment and cannot believe the New Zealand government cannot do more.
2189 AnonymousJacek Suchocki 2006.03.13 41-407 Imielin ul.Wyzwolenia 62A tel.fax. 0048 (32) 2257025 email :jsuchocki1@tlen.pl James Edward Fagan III Help for foreign victims of Katowice MPT roof collapse (january 2006) (send please this text to lawyers,representing victims of this tragedy ) I/m retired journalist and one year I investigate problem of collapse MTK building ( in Katowice in 28 Jannuary 2006 ).I was present at many trials and addittonally I corresponded to Polish Buiding Ministry. Actually,claims of vicims/s families and injureds amount above 12 milions złotych ( about 4 milions USD). Finnally,sum of compensations vill be of course multiple more. My (after lawyers consultations) motion is follow: “Main responsible for this collapse (in 80-90 % ) are local State Building inspectors so State Administration. and Polish authorities will have to pay compensations in this percentage.” Motivation: In the end of December 2005 and in beginning of Jannuary 2006 on the roofs in Silesia in poland too ,lied enormal layer of ice-snow.The pressure on roofs was twice (and more) above maximal admissible.!!!!(it was opinions of two polytechnics ) It was character of natural disaster and buiding authorities ought to handle it very seriously. In December 2005 and in first days of Jannuary 2006 broke down about 17 big roofs in Silesia and in all Poland territorry.Those were roofs of markets,s stores,sporthalls,factories(those collapses did not provoke death victims,because they happened on nights or when buildinds were empty) In winter 2005-2006 (December-march) collapsed 72 big roofs under icesnow pressure in Poland. Then,in the beggining of Jannuary 2006 Building state Inspectors (so the best building inginners)had (under penalty of the law): TO CLOSE ALL BIG AREA BUIDINGS till take away this deaths,s dangerous ice snow layer.!!! In polish Building Law exists many law articles about building inspectors duties.: -2- article 69.1 (duty of buiding inspector to remove danger for life or health ) article.68 (like art.69) article.89.c(duty for local administratio to remove danger and to force buiding inspectors for activity) penalty article:95.pt.3:( is under law responsibillity,who didn,t prewent danger from buiding) -article for building inspectors. I/m not lawyer and my knowledge is limited,but I think those informations are sufficiently. I was present at many trials about this cataastrophe and newr lawyers did not raise a subject of guilty of polish buiding administration in this tragedy,and MTK is approved as only guilty.!!!! In a case of effectively use of my suggestions J/d like to profit 1 % from payment from state administration. Additionally,I inform,that till actuality, polish building ministry did not introduce law modifications,to pevent tragedys like MTK collapse. Yours sincerely Jacek Suchocki Confirm please.by fax or email.
2190 AnonymousJacek Suchocki 2006.03.13 41-407 Imielin ul.Wyzwolenia 62A tel.fax. 0048 (32) 2257025 email :jsuchocki1@tlen.pl James Edward Fagan III Help for foreign victims of Katowice MPT roof collapse (january 2006) (send please this text to lawyers,representing victims of this tragedy ) I/m retired journalist and one year I investigate problem of collapse MTK building ( in Katowice in 28 Jannuary 2006 ).I was present at many trials and addittonally I corresponded to Polish Buiding Ministry. Actually,claims of vicims/s families and injureds amount above 12 milions złotych ( about 4 milions USD). Finnally,sum of compensations vill be of course multiple more. My (after lawyers consultations) motion is follow: “Main responsible for this collapse (in 80-90 % ) are local State Building inspectors so State Administration. and Polish authorities will have to pay compensations in this percentage.” Motivation: In the end of December 2005 and in beginning of Jannuary 2006 on the roofs in Silesia in poland too ,lied enormal layer of ice-snow.The pressure on roofs was twice (and more) above maximal admissible.!!!!(it was opinions of two polytechnics ) It was character of natural disaster and buiding authorities ought to handle it very seriously. In December 2005 and in first days of Jannuary 2006 broke down about 17 big roofs in Silesia and in all Poland territorry.Those were roofs of markets,s stores,sporthalls,factories(those collapses did not provoke death victims,because they happened on nights or when buildinds were empty) In winter 2005-2006 (December-march) collapsed 72 big roofs under icesnow pressure in Poland. Then,in the beggining of Jannuary 2006 Building state Inspectors (so the best building inginners)had (under penalty of the law): TO CLOSE ALL BIG AREA BUIDINGS till take away this deaths,s dangerous ice snow layer.!!! In polish Building Law exists many law articles about building inspectors duties.: -2- article 69.1 (duty of buiding inspector to remove danger for life or health ) article.68 (like art.69) article.89.c(duty for local administratio to remove danger and to force buiding inspectors for activity) penalty article:95.pt.3:( is under law responsibillity,who didn,t prewent danger from buiding) -article for building inspectors. I/m not lawyer and my knowledge is limited,but I think those informations are sufficiently. I was present at many trials about this cataastrophe and newr lawyers did not raise a subject of guilty of polish buiding administration in this tragedy,and MTK is approved as only guilty.!!!! In a case of effectively use of my suggestions J/d like to profit 1 % from payment from state administration. Additionally,I inform,that till actuality, polish building ministry did not introduce law modifications,to pevent tragedys like MTK collapse. Yours sincerely Jacek Suchocki Confirm please.by fax or email.
2191 jacek suchocki journalistS end this tekst to mr.Bruce Robinson please.Jacek Suchocki 2006.03.13 41-407 Imielin ul.Wyzwolenia 62A tel.fax. 0048 (32) 2257025 email :jsuchocki1@tlen.pl James Edward Fagan III Help for foreign victims of Katowice MPT roof collapse (january 2006) (send please this text to lawyers,representing victims of this tragedy ) I/m retired journalist and one year I investigate problem of collapse MTK building ( in Katowice in 28 Jannuary 2006 ).I was present at many trials and addittonally I corresponded to Polish Buiding Ministry. Actually,claims of vicims/s families and injureds amount above 12 milions złotych ( about 4 milions USD). Finnally,sum of compensations vill be of course multiple more. My (after lawyers consultations) motion is follow: “Main responsible for this collapse (in 80-90 % ) are local State Building inspectors so State Administration. and Polish authorities will have to pay compensations in this percentage.” Motivation: In the end of December 2005 and in beginning of Jannuary 2006 on the roofs in Silesia in poland too ,lied enormal layer of ice-snow.The pressure on roofs was twice (and more) above maximal admissible.!!!!(it was opinions of two polytechnics ) It was character of natural disaster and buiding authorities ought to handle it very seriously. In December 2005 and in first days of Jannuary 2006 broke down about 17 big roofs in Silesia and in all Poland territorry.Those were roofs of markets,s stores,sporthalls,factories(those collapses did not provoke death victims,because they happened on nights or when buildinds were empty) In winter 2005-2006 (December-march) collapsed 72 big roofs under icesnow pressure in Poland. Then,in the beggining of Jannuary 2006 Building state Inspectors (so the best building inginners)had (under penalty of the law): TO CLOSE ALL BIG AREA BUIDINGS till take away this deaths,s dangerous ice snow layer.!!! In polish Building Law exists many law articles about building inspectors duties.: -2- article 69.1 (duty of buiding inspector to remove danger for life or health ) article.68 (like art.69) article.89.c(duty for local administratio to remove danger and to force buiding inspectors for activity) penalty article:95.pt.3:( is under law responsibillity,who didn,t prewent danger from buiding) -article for building inspectors. I/m not lawyer and my knowledge is limited,but I think those informations are sufficiently. I was present at many trials about this cataastrophe and newr lawyers did not raise a subject of guilty of polish buiding administration in this tragedy,and MTK is approved as only guilty.!!!! In a case of effectively use of my suggestions J/d like to profit 1 % from payment from state administration. Additionally,I inform,that till actuality, polish building ministry did not introduce law modifications,to pevent tragedys like MTK collapse. Yours sincerely Jacek Suchocki Confirm please.by fax or email.
2192 AnonymousI am thorougly appalled, hearing of this situation, in the actions of the Polish courts, and the lack of intervention of the New Zealand government. As a native New Zealander, it truly rattles my faith in my own government to protect its citizens from basic human rights violations.
2193 Deborah Weston CAPoland should be ashamed of itself for having such a poor justice system. The UK & the EU should not tolerate this kind of inhume treatment of a person. The NZ Govt must do something for his kids sake.
2194 Deborah WestonPoland's justice system is appauling. Bruce has not been convicted and has been treated like a caged animnal. Why is Poland partof the EU with this kind of third world justice system?
2195 matti wouldn't like polish sausage
2196 Andy LongThis travesty must end. A terrible tragedy is not made better by ruining the lives of innocent law-abiding people
2197 Deniz Karadeniz
2198 AnonymousWe let all their immigrants come to our country, and for what? This?!?!?!
2199 michael zabow
2200 Lucy WalshThis is an awful situation. At the very least, Bruce should have had access to clean, adequate prison conditions which do not infringe upon his human rights.

 

Signatures | Total: 2,200