Free Chris McGee
As sad as it is a gross miscarriage of justice has happened here & he should not have been found guilty it should have been Accidental death we need to get this sentence reversed!!!! Please read the following link
Links
Discussion
-
d bramell
the prosecution stated that georgie was clearly drunk on james st station, if she was as CLEARLY DRUNK as they believe then why did they need to show the platform footage numerous times as chris only had one opportunity to see this.The prosecution then decided to show the edited footage of the carriage numerous times, chris could not see this from his cab, yet it was portrayed as if he could clearly see the carriage. It was not the juries job to see if georgie was drunk, it was their job to see if they could tell If chris could see if she was drunk on the platform after watching the platform footage once and once.If you can not tell after watching the platform footage just once and only once, like chris then the verdict had to be NOT GUILTY other wise another mis-carriage of justice.
-
Chris Davies
Gee's defence was pathetic. It has happened again since Gee was convicted ! and even now Sunday 24/11/13 TV program showing drunken youths, drinking alcohol on the platform with total impunity !
Pull your fucking finger out ! ! !
Recent signatures
-
d bramell, Stoke-on-trent, United Kingdom
just now -
Stephen Kent, Cramlington, United Kingdom
2 weeks ago -
Des Sheppard, United Kingdom
2 weeks ago
Petition highlights
There are no highlights yet.
d bramell the prosecution stated that georgie was clearly drunk on james st station, if she was as CLEARLY DRUNK as they believe then why did they need to show the platform footage numerous times as chris only had one opportunity to see this.The prosecution then decided to show the edited footage of the carriage numerous times, chris could not see this from his cab, yet it was portrayed as if he could clearly see the carriage. It was not the juries job to see if georgie was drunk, it was their job to see if they could tell If chris could see if she was drunk on the platform after watching the platform footage once and once.If you can not tell after watching the platform footage just once and only once, like chris then the verdict had to be NOT GUILTY other wise another mis-carriage of justice.