Signatures 183 total
-
1
Name: Paul Ruscher on Feb 25, 2008Comments: This petition will be delivered to Speaker Rubio on the first day of the legislative session.Flag
-
2
Name: Stacy Scott on Feb 25, 2008Comments: The Academic Freedom provision has verifiably been linked to the Discovery Institute which is the foundation of the Intelligent Design movement. I.D. has already been ruled to be religion by Judge Jones.Flag
-
3
Name: Kyle Cozad on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Lars Zachariasen on Feb 25, 2008Comments: I Fully support the unaltered standards but I'm happy that the additional changes, AKA. "Academic Freedom" provisions were not adopted.Flag
-
5
Name: Susan Cooper on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Kathy Savage on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Bonnie Mizell on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Gregory A. Mead on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Mary Bahr on Feb 25, 2008Comments: Lets not shortchange our children by misrepresenting what science is all about. In addition to academic freedom (already contained in the standards) we also need to be concerned about academic integrity.Flag
-
10
Name: Jane Pfeilsticker on Feb 25, 2008Comments: The standards contain a clearly written component that skillfully and appropriately adresses the concerns of the few who wish to modify them. This component is titled "Nature of Science" and can be found at the beginning of the 9-12 Bodies of Knowlege.Flag
-
11
Name: Susan Leeds on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Anonymous on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Eileen Tramontana on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Thomas Jordan on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Barry Golden on Feb 25, 2008Comments: The Nature of Science standards are already very clear about how ALL scientific knowledge is tentative, yet empirically based.Flag
-
16
Name: David Bracht on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Donna Poniatowski on Feb 25, 2008Comments: private citizenFlag
-
18
Name: Gwen Shangle on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Thomas H. Mareci, Ph.D. on Feb 25, 2008Comments: As a practicing scientist, I find the new science standards to be a great step in the right direction. The "academic freedom" provision does not promote either an academic position or freedom. It is an poor attempt to stifle the free scientific inquiry for the truth and has no place in a science classroom.Flag
-
20
Name: Katherine Cali on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Susan Brennan on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Bruce P Bookout on Feb 25, 2008Comments: Let the self regulating nature of science serve itself.Flag
-
23
Name: David Huber on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Elizabeth Broen on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Michael McCants on Feb 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Andrea Valdovinos on Feb 25, 2008Comments: The new science standards were thoughtfully prepared by the framers and writers to give Florida students an opportunity to receive a world-class science education to prepare them to meet their responsibilities and dreams as scientifically literate citizens. Please support these standards for Florida's teachers and students.Flag
-
27
Name: Kathryn Bylsma on Feb 25, 2008Comments: We've worked long and hard to create world-class standards that will support our teachers and encourage our students. Allowing for further deviation from the expected goal is tantamount to failure.Flag
-
28
Name: Sherry Southerland on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Nancy Davis on Feb 26, 2008Comments: I support the Standards revisions.Flag
-
30
Name: Heidi Bemis on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Marlene Morales on Feb 26, 2008Comments: The new standards are more explicitly aligned to the National Science Education Standards and research in the area of science education particularly the nature of science and teaching of evolution.Flag
-
32
Name: German Delgado on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Nichole Seaman on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Jim Sullivan on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Patrick James Enderle on Feb 26, 2008Comments: Any "academic freedom" clause would nullify the intent of academic standards and belittle the massive amount of effort that when into constructing these science standards. As well, the image of the State of Florida would be nationally and internationally damaged by giving credence to any such efforts.Flag
-
36
Name: MaLynn Kelso on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Dr. Francisco Coro on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Susan Neimand on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Daniel Spector on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Penny J. Gilmer on Feb 26, 2008Comments: Our K-12 students need to know science with evolution as an integral part of science, as we know it. I fully support the newly revised Florida Sunshine State standards.Flag
-
41
Name: Jonathon Grooms on Feb 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Mehmet Aydeniz on Feb 27, 2008Comments: Science standards should reflect and promote a habit of mind practiced by scientists not a game practiced by politicians.Flag
-
43
Name: Joseph Cain on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Reba Henderson on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Jordan Louis on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Ray Bellamy, MD on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Gary Whittenberger on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Barbara Psimas on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Arturo Rodriguez on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Steven Blumsack on Feb 27, 2008Comments:Flag