No Fujitsu Pay Freeze 2009

Signatures 1565 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 32 › »

1. 151
   Name: W N Hallam on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN34

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: BARBARA HORTON on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): wak01

   Comments: utterly disgraceful that the company are using the currennt economic climate to deny its employees a pay rise with no proper explanation etc will the top bosses forgoe a pay rise i very much doubt it,!!!!!! we are penalised for incidents of lateness etc when not our fault put on pips monitored within an inch of our lives so morale is very low to start off with ...so this is just the last straw. Top Management have no conception of how the rank and file ordinary Fujitsu employee feels ....no do i think they actually care

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Colin Cook on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): SOL10

   Comments: It appears that Fujitsu are trying to cash in on the pay freezes announced by those organisations who opted for Government loans as a solution to going bankrupt. I dont belive that the company can not afford a pay award to staff who have contributed so much and given so little

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Steve Harrison on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN34

   Comments: Yet again, the loyal employees who care about the company, who plan to work here for years suffer another blow in a long succession of annual disappointment.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Phil Clifton on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN34

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Peter Jones on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN35

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Chris Price on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): war 08

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: David Gallagher on Mar 27, 2009

   Base location code (e.g. HOM99): CRE02

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Ian Blackwood on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN33

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Alan Pye on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments: I feel this Pay Freeze is not justified and the company is taking advantage of its employees ecomonic situation

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Ian Dyke on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN33

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Carol Westwood on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): WAK01

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Kieran Delaney on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN35

    Comments: It stinks!!!

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Glen Shaw on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN35

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Keith Clark on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments: I am totally disappointed in the fact that no pay increase is forthcoming. There is no incentive to work hard as no rewards are ever given. This will demoralise people even more which is not a good way forward.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Tony Sturgess on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): Bra01

    Comments: the company is on target for profit this FY so why turn that around and say there will be a pay freeze

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Helen Clayson on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN33

    Comments: What a shoddy way to treat your most valuable assets

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN37

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Adrian Chambers on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): WGN01

    Comments: Do we need a timecode for filling in this petition

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): WAK01

    Comments: Does the company not realise that the prices of food, petrol, clothing, gas & electric, and other necessary items are on the up and not being frozen like our income. By freezing our pay after the global email from Richard Christou in February telling us that the companies financial results for the third quarter were stong, we are being told exactly who matters to the company - AND IT IS NOT US.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Billy Brayshaw on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN34

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Andrew Paul on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): IRE11

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Mike Shawcross on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): Man33

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Wilf Williams on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): CRE02

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Roy Brough on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN34

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Richard Everett on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN34

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Vijay Jolly on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): Top23

    Comments: This will affect the pensions very much as loosing a rise at this point after years of below inflation rises will the final straw! This will apply to all those coming upto retirement.

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): IRE11

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Nigel Vickerstaff on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): SOL10

    Comments: After last year when pay increases, for the majority, matched inflation at best, plus the absence of bonuses following the withdrawal from the NHS contract, I (and probably many others) was counting on this years pay round for a degree of “catch-up”. I appreciate the economic climate is not good, but no pay increase, while living costs (especially energy & food) continue to rise, is not acceptable, especially when company briefings tell us that we continue to perform well and better than nearly all our competitors.

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Bret Walton on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): WAR08

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Michael Knight on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): BRS10

    Comments: I think the pay freeze is unfair due to the current climate and we should benifit from a wage increase to cope with the rise in food and living costs. We currently are on -2K to 3K below industry standard for the roles will fill on our desk for second line support. Fujitsu should pay attention and offer a competitive package to its employees.

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): IRE11

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Nic Hayes on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): CAF02

    Comments: It seems that FJ is using the economic climate as an excuss not to reward there hard working employees! This does not seem ethical if this is true... Give me a reason or show me the money!

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Mike Mangnall on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): BOL01

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Brett Conway on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN35

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Bob Hurst on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): Man34

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Robert Foan on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments: Another year that I will fail to increase my earnings, along with a pension that is shrinking year on year at a greater pace. We will all be tasked with meeting some management goal with a promise of riches in the future.Problem is they have used up all the goodwill now and we just dont want to be used like this anymore.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Kieren Coates on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): LDN05

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): man35

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Stephen Ramsay on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): IRE11

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): LON04

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): STE04

    Comments: If its true that The company expects to make a substantial profit in 2008-9. Then i find that shocking

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Nick Cotterell on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): HOM99

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Imran Patel on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): man35

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Teresa Meyer on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): MAN35

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2009

    Base location code (e.g. HOM99): IRE11

    Comments: It really makes going the extra mile seem worth it. Yet another kick in the teeth by the company in these though times.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 32 › »