Pubcreds: Fixing the Peer Review Process by “Privatizing” the Reviewer Commons

Signatures 252 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »

1. 201
   Name: Roger Paulo Mormul on Aug 11, 2010

   Comments: As an author and reviewer I agree with PubCreds!

   Flag
2. 202
   Name: Rafael Dias Loyola on Aug 11, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 203
   Name: Martin Hartvig on Aug 11, 2010

   Comments: This proposal is good for initiating discussions on how to fix the peer review system. Multiple problems are still to be solved as e.g. Dennis Hansen point out.

   Flag
4. 204
   Name: Mary V. Price on Aug 14, 2010

   Comments: This idea is worthy of consideration.

   Flag
5. 205
   Name: Claire Jouseau on Aug 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 206
   Name: Hans Henrik Bruun on Aug 17, 2010

   Comments: I support the principle of counteracting cheating - exploiting common goods without willingness to contribute back is parasitism.

   Flag
7. 207
   Name: Kasper Gade on Aug 17, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 208
   Name: Andreas Wessel on Aug 19, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 209
   Name: Cóilín Minto on Aug 20, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 210
    Name: George Livingston on Aug 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 211
    Name: Anders Hargeby on Aug 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 212
    Name: Olaf Jensen on Aug 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 213
    Name: Dr. Michael Brockhurst on Aug 20, 2010

    Comments: What a good idea!

    Flag
14. 214
    Name: Uno Wennergren on Aug 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 215
    Name: Jonathan Verreault on Aug 23, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 216
    Name: Daniel E. Bunker on Aug 25, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 217
    Name: Paul Bourdeau on Aug 30, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 218
    Name: Gunilla Andersson on Aug 30, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 219
    Name: David Vasseur on Sep 1, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 220
    Name: James Watling on Sep 6, 2010

    Comments: While we are overhauling the peer-review process, I would argue for a standard double-blind review process as well.

    Flag
21. 221
    Name: David R. Anderson on Sep 6, 2010

    Comments: This is worth a trial; the current system is in a total meltdown.

    Flag
22. 222
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 6, 2010

    Comments: I am a phd student and learn great deal from reviewers comments on submitted papers. Sometime, I think reviewers teach me more than my advisors do in person!!! I think peer review is a wonderful service to science, and I really do not want cheaters to ruin the good for all. We need to cooperate now to prevent the spread of cheaters and save such a wonderful system.

    Flag
23. 223
    Name: Hannah Buckley on Sep 6, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 224
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 225
    Name: Hugo Sarmento on Sep 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 226
    Name: José M. Montoya on Sep 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 227
    Name: Evaristo Vázquez-Domínguez on Sep 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 228
    Name: Rafel Simó on Sep 22, 2010

    Comments: Not sure this is the best solution, but would like the discussion to happen.

    Flag
29. 229
    Name: Jan Sunde on Sep 23, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 230
    Name: Emma Sayer on Sep 23, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 231
    Name: Elisa Thebault on Sep 27, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 232
    Name: Antoine Morin on Oct 5, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 233
    Name: Ute Jacob on Oct 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 234
    Name: Kim Tsao on Nov 3, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 235
    Name: Kira Askaroff on Nov 13, 2010

    Comments: excellent idea

    Flag
36. 236
    Name: Kmczbda on Dec 24, 2010

    Comments: This comment was deleted on 2012-01-27 18:29:31

    Flag
37. 237
    Name: Rafael Luque on Dec 28, 2010

    Comments: I am highly supportive of this initiative as young author and reviewer for many journals

    Flag
38. 238
    Name: Claudia Kammann on Jan 15, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 239
    Name: Audrey Zannese on Jan 31, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 240
    Name: Carmelo Fruciano on Apr 27, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 241
    Name: Christian Gortazar on May 25, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 242
    Name: A. Marcia Barbosa on May 26, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 243
    Name: Catarina Ferreira on May 26, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 244
    Name: Riley Pollom on Oct 25, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 245
    Name: Daniel J. McGarvey on Nov 22, 2011

    Comments: As an Associate Editor for Fisheries and a tenure-track Assistant Professor that regularly spends too much time searching for reviewers and performing "3rd" reviews to compensate for inadequate review comments, I have finally come to the conclusion that a PubCredits system, or something comparable, is not only warranted, but indispensable to the future of peer-reviewed publication.

    Flag
46. 246
    Name: Buy Oem Software on Feb 12, 2012

    Comments: NdzREK Thanks for all the answers:) In fact, learned a lot of new information. Dut I just didn`t figure out what is what till the end!....

    Flag
47. 247
    Name: Adobe OEM Software on Mar 9, 2012

    Comments: HIiXy0 Appreciate you sharing, great blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

    Flag
48. 248
    Name: Adrian Stier on Jul 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 249
    Name: Mikko Heino on Jul 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 250
    Name: Udywcypmnu on Aug 3, 2012

    Comments: This comment was deleted on 2013-02-10 16:06:19

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »