Abolition of Non Japanese fingerprinting program

Signatures 3262 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 66 › »

1. 51
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Nicolas Lebreton on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Aaron Kaemmerer on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Alec Odahara on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments: The Japanese government should not be treating innocent tourists and businessmen as though they are criminals.

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Richard Hudgins on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments: I reject this new law, it amounts to undue harassment and racism against non-Japanese citizens of Japan.

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Gordon Osse on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Krzysztof Rozwadowski on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments: The priority should get the more permanent residents and visa holders out of this first, but basically either fingerprint everyone in the country or fingerprint noone. I don't see how Japanese people are any less likely to commit crime than foreigners.

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Garrath Green on Oct 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Yann Boquillon on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Aitor Kortazar on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: David Driver on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: 日本の再入国カード所有者に対する指紋採取に反対します。

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Rabahi on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: 指紋採取義務付けに反対を強く主張します。人権を侵害する法律としてしかとられることができません。日本のあらゆる問題の理由を外国人のせいにする政府、誰が悪いのですか？1995年に東京の地下鉄に起こった事件の責任者は外国人だったのですか？ロンドンの交通機関に起こった爆発は英国人じゃなかったのですか？指紋採取で世界規模のテロをなにも解決しません。最も深い社会的な理由があります。　考え直して下さい！

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Evan Pike on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Ben Shearon on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: This new policy is meaningless in terms of fighting terrorism, discriminates against non-Japanese residents of Japan, is a waste of money, and does not address important questions regarding how the information gathered will be stored, used, disseminated, and administered.

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: James Lynch on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: Dear Sir/Madam, I respectively ask that you reconsider forcing foreign Permanent Residency holders to provide fingerprints and eye scans when entering Japan. Yours Sincerely, James Lynch

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Andrew Clarke on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: Japan's period of Iosolation ended in the meji period - don't start another one! Don't follow America's lead in worsening relations with non-citizens, its a very shallow and pointless policy decision that only has negative ramifications. Please dont do this!!! Keep Japan as friendly as we all think it is and embrace warm international relationships that will last into the future.

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Guido De Melo on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Evan Brankin on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: This is an absurd law.

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Deschamps on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Mike Smith on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: Don't finger print foreigners - we are not guilty of anything, except wanting to visit your country. Innocent until proven guilt!

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Kevin Lim on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: Fingerprinting are reserved for criminals.

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Saeri Fukuishima on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: 外国人を犯罪者みたいにとりあつかわないで！！

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Bernard David on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Charean Jacobs on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: This is discrimination. My husband is Japanese & a permanent resident of Australia. I can't imagine how he would feel if he had to be fingerprinted & photographed every time he entered Australia, a country he owns a home in and pay taxes. Japan needs to join the global community and this is just another step backwards for Japan. Japan is losing its control in Asia and this shows that it is not willing nor able to show global leadership.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: The first image of Japan a foreigner will get will be this fingerprint control. Just think of the negative effect on the "Cool power" of Japan... A reputation takes long time to build but just a second to be destroyed. Then, just imagine yourself, being controlled in the same way when you arrive in the European Union, while all the European citizens are excluded from this control... Won't you feel unfairly discriminated

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Ryan Hagglund on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: 国際結婚をした日本人にも迷惑をかけてしまいます。日本人である私の妻は一人で子供と入国するのが非常に大変そうなので、私と一緒に外国人の列に並んで入国するほうが言いといっています。アメリカみたいに、国際結婚をした国民を考えてもらいたいと思います。

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Justin Ratcliff on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: テロ防止にならないと思います。日本の税金の 無駄遣いにすぎない。

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Morgan R on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Jean Ledieu on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: Je suis contre ce projet de loi!

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Echerbault Ronan on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Dominique Huynh on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Daniel Pulvermacher on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: 1984 was 23 years ago already...

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Rowan White on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: これは差別でテロと関係ありません。やめていただきませんか？

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Jenn Fukuyama on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Michael Ellis on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Lemoine Sophie on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments: It is legitimate to want to protect themselves. But I find it disappointing that Japan uses such a law. Japan could brake economic investment and cultural exchange. It's a shame.

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Chuck Kayser on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 66 › »