Fight Against T&T Breed Specific Legislation

Signatures 3478 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 › »

1. 3351
   Name: Raisa Chadee on May 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 3352
   Name: Anonymous on May 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3353
   Name: Anonymous on May 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 3354
   Name: Jonathan Juman on May 19, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 3355
   Name: Nalini Sooklal on May 19, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 3356
   Name: Keston Lewis on May 19, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 3357
   Name: Olson Henry on May 19, 2012

   Comments: BSL or DOL is like trying to solve a problem by killing one of its symptoms. Like cutting off ones nose so he can't sneeze. People the main problem is crime(mainly larceny and home invasions). I love pets, but i wouldn't keep one that eats more than me and yet i have to clean up after it, if my life didn't depend in some way on it. The First three lines of the Constitution of T&T talks of the right to safety.(now i am not saying that one must be safe at the expense of another. i am not saying yes to stupid negligence.) So you can't be "garranteed" good police response, the right to bear arms is a no no, and now it is close to impossible to own a dog that can protect you. So what, we're being govern by terrorist here or something? People its already hard to stop bandits in this place already, you mean you will give them free reign on the poor now? So then safety is for the rich? Is that what the legislature is saying? Including accidents that's not reported, automobiles kill and injure a couple hundreds each year. I don't see bans on vehicles that can go over the nations stipulated speed limits. Or is it like other laws that nobody up holds,(J walking, defecating in public etc.) So its a wasting time and money on laws that make little sense season.? People there is nothing; besides when T&TEC tek yuh current(no insults meant), that is more inviting to a bandit like an unguarded yard.. People be wise. Think this right out. What T&T need is the hardest of legislation to deal with criminals, and the heaviest of police presence all over the country, or else we are SPINNING THE PROVERBIAL TOP IN MUD.....

   Flag
8. 3358
   Name: Olson Henry on May 19, 2012

   Comments: BSL or DOL is like trying to solve a problem by killing one of its symptoms. Like cutting off ones nose so he can't sneeze. People the main problem is crime(mainly larceny and home invasions). I love pets, but i wouldn't keep one that eats more than me and yet i have to clean up after it, if my life didn't depend in some way on it. The First three lines of the Constitution of T&T talks of the right to safety.(now i am not saying that one must be safe at the expense of another. i am not saying yes to stupid negligence.) So you can't be "garranteed" good police response, the right to bear arms is a no no, and now it is close to impossible to own a dog that can protect you. So what, we're being govern by terrorist here or something? People its already hard to stop bandits in this place already, you mean you will give them free reign on the poor now? So then safety is for the rich? Is that what the legislature is saying? Including accidents that's not reported, automobiles kill and injure a couple hundreds each year. I don't see bans on vehicles that can go over the nations stipulated speed limits. Or is it like other laws that nobody up holds,(J walking, defecating in public etc.) So its a wasting time and money on laws that make little sense season.? People there is nothing; besides when T&TEC tek yuh current(no insults meant), that is more inviting to a bandit like an unguarded yard.. People be wise. Think this right out. What T&T need is the hardest of legislation to deal with criminals, and the heaviest of police presence all over the country, or else we are SPINNING THE PROVERBIAL TOP IN MUD.....

   Flag
9. 3359
   Name: Indra Ramlal-dass on May 19, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 3360
    Name: Timothy Aird on May 20, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 3361
    Name: Narvin Ramdeen on May 20, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 3362
    Name: Theron Compton on May 20, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 3363
    Name: Narine Dookiesingh on May 20, 2012

    Comments: i have pitbulls and american bullies. they are d most gentle giants u can find and day are all pets.its not d breed but d orwners dat are at fault and should b held responsible 4 any dog attacts

    Flag
14. 3364
    Name: Evan Farrell on May 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 3365
    Name: Karren on May 21, 2012

    Comments: This Dangerous Dog Act is like putting a dirty bandaid on a gaping wound it will not do any good.We need all dogs to be licensed at a reasonable cost and also proper law enforcement.

    Flag
16. 3366
    Name: Sanatam Varoon Ramjattan on May 21, 2012

    Comments: Leave my babies alone!

    Flag
17. 3367
    Name: Nadira Chadee Ramdeen on May 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 3368
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 3369
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 3370
    Name: Navin Dass on May 22, 2012

    Comments: because of a few inconsiderate, irresponsible and ignorant persons !

    Flag
21. 3371
    Name: Timothy Hosein on May 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 3372
    Name: Rodney Dass on May 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 3373
    Name: Razim Hosein on May 23, 2012

    Comments: This dangerous dog legislation act shall not be passed.

    Flag
24. 3374
    Name: Eugene Todd on May 25, 2012

    Comments: This government said we wil rise big joke??????????????????????????

    Flag
25. 3375
    Name: Ryan Logan on May 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 3376
    Name: Charleen House on May 27, 2012

    Comments: Ban dangerous people instead!!

    Flag
27. 3377
    Name: Earl Paynter on May 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 3378
    Name: Karla Balloo on May 27, 2012

    Comments: i disagree the act because it is breed specific, the pp government is trying to play god by eliminating a whole breed and $250,000 is unreachable for middle class citizens like my dogs. I love my dogs they are like my children and i will go to any lenghts to protect them. Ivoted for the pp government in the last election but never more if they pass the act as is.

    Flag
29. 3379
    Name: Anonymous on May 27, 2012

    Comments: I do not support $250,000 insurance and spaying and neuthering all pitbulls

    Flag
30. 3380
    Name: Anonymous on May 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 3381
    Name: Anonymous on May 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 3382
    Name: Jacob Alexander on May 27, 2012

    Comments: Is the Government trying to keep citizens safe from attacks by dogs or are they trying to make life easier for burglars and bandits?

    Flag
33. 3383
    Name: Kevin Ganess on May 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 3384
    Name: Randal Reyes on May 27, 2012

    Comments: I own twentyone dogs and i'am against breed specific legislation. One insurance policy to cover the household and lic'd of $100.00,Be responsible!!

    Flag
35. 3385
    Name: Navinmaraj on May 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 3386
    Name: Lucy Garcia on May 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 3387
    Name: Kimberly Kissoondath on May 29, 2012

    Comments: I agree and am in full support of the implementation of a Dog ownership law as opposed to a Specific breed. All Dogs has teeth not specific breeds!

    Flag
38. 3388
    Name: Kamile Alladin on Jun 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 3389
    Name: Brandon Ramjohn on Jun 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 3390
    Name: Falconilla Racine Harripaul on Jun 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 3391
    Name: Joevon Nickie Melville on Jun 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 3392
    Name: Dave Seeram on Jun 6, 2012

    Comments: Love, Loyalty and Protection

    Flag
43. 3393
    Name: Kerl Noray on Jun 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 3394
    Name: Yavniel Yatali on Jun 11, 2012

    Comments: A Dog is what its OWNER makes it!

    Flag
45. 3395
    Name: Narissa Field on Jun 13, 2012

    Comments: Peter must not pay for Paul in this situation. Some pits getting out of control due to the poor decisions of their masters does not mean all pits should just go. The owner's should be the ones held responsible for their dogs.

    Flag
46. 3396
    Name: Wetman Jenilson Starzz on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 3397
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 3398
    Name: Candice on Jun 21, 2012

    Comments: Dogs should not be blamed, it's the same as raising a child- what you teach is what they project.

    Flag
49. 3399
    Name: A-A Wilson on Jun 21, 2012

    Comments: Immediately our careless citizens are abandoning their animals!!! I support the implementation of a Dog Ownership Law that holds owners responsible and accountable for treating dogs right, giving proper care, homes,etc to them, training for the larger breeds, and implementing "Animal Cops of TT" where owners will be held accountable for their irresponsible actions!

    Flag
50. 3400
    Name: Natalie on Jun 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 › »