Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 335 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 »

  1. 51
    Name: Lehnanne Kidd on Sep 8, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 52
    Name: Dani Fife on Sep 8, 2002
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 53
    Name: Misty Pony on Sep 8, 2002
    State:
    Country: IE
    Comments: I am in control of my life. It belongs to me. I do NOT want to have any children! I want to stay CHILDFREE! This world already has too many humans in it. 180 more are added every minute. Too many humans will turn this world into a gigantic city with lots of pollution and huge crowds. That will NOT be pretty! To end the problems of crowds and pollution, here is the best solution:For humans to STOP HAVING SO MANY BABIES! Then,for sure,(not just maybe)there'll be less crowding and less pollution,too. And the world will be a better place for me and you.
    Flag
  4. 54
    Name: Chris Ford on Sep 8, 2002
    State: ND
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 55
    Name: Misty Simonds on Sep 8, 2002
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 56
    Name: Liz Witthuhn on Sep 8, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Why are we rewarding people for choosing to procreate Totally unfair!
    Flag
  7. 57
    Name: D L Van Eperen on Sep 8, 2002
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments: As someone who is in the same boat-I was (and remain) appalled that people who have the presence of mind and the financial sense to avoid having children they cannot afford are penalized in this fashion. As a childless adult I am locked out of so many services that I forget to keep count-but being locked out of an education based on familial status is flat-out discriminatory.
    Flag
  8. 58
    Name: Marley Greiner on Sep 8, 2002
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments: This is ludricrous. Discrimination based on parental orientation.
    Flag
  9. 59
    Name: Marley Greiner on Sep 8, 2002
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments: This is ludricrous. Discrimination based on parental orientation.
    Flag
  10. 60
    Name: David Nycz on Sep 8, 2002
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments: I hate how this country discriminates against its people so much.So much for freedom.Sounds like the wrapper is better than the candy underneath to me.
    Flag
  11. 61
    Name: Beth Brownell on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MO
    Country: US
    Comments: I believe if the goverment wants people to be responsible and those people who do not have kids cannot get this grant cause they have money to spare for later problems could be for medical or if they lost a job. I think those people who do the RIGHT THING by not having kids and going for their college education should not be penalized for it. Those people are the ones who should get this grant. If they do not do this, then please create a new Grant for those who do not have kids and yet have the desire to get their college education and become very responsible adults.
    Flag
  12. 62
    Name: Lorraine Williams on Sep 9, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 63
    Name: Joy Harp on Sep 9, 2002
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 64
    Name: Mark Harp on Sep 9, 2002
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 65
    Name: Kellie Stuck on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments: It is wrong to punish a person who has shown good judgement and is willing to work hard to better themselves by denying them the means to reach their goals BECAUSE of their good judgement and well thought out decisions.
    Flag
  16. 66
    Name: Brooke Miller on Sep 9, 2002
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 67
    Name: Linda Wolff on Sep 9, 2002
    State: IN
    Country: US
    Comments: It shouldn't be limited to just married couples. There are plenty of low-income singles without children who would like to attend college, as well, but are not eligible for any grants. I find it strange that people who choose not to have children for any reason are penalized by being denied help with further education.
    Flag
  18. 68
    Name: Christi Bayha on Sep 9, 2002
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 69
    Name: Adrienne Sneed on Sep 9, 2002
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 70
    Name: Tara McCartney on Sep 9, 2002
    State: NY
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 71
    Name: Christine Ritchie on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MD
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 72
    Name: Christie Partee on Sep 9, 2002
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 73
    Name: Keith Barber on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 74
    Name: Beth Nolan on Sep 9, 2002
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments: I live in Seattle and I'm in the same boat. I would love to be able to go back to college full-time but I can't afford it. I can swing the community college tuition on my own but I will need help with the tuition at my local university. By the way, none of the Seattle Community Colleges even participates in the Federal Student Loan program. If I had a kid, this would be a non-issue.
    Flag
  25. 75
    Name: Nicole Adriano on Sep 9, 2002
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments: It's unfair to give to those who make poor choices and to withhold things from responsible people.
    Flag
  26. 76
    Name: Andrea Ray on Sep 9, 2002
    State: WV
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 77
    Name: Noelle Hurley on Sep 9, 2002
    State: OR
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 78
    Name: Elli Edy on Sep 9, 2002
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments: Denying people financial aid for education based upon reproductive status is a ludicrous form of discrimination. Education is the backbone of our society, producing a skilled workforce for our country. No one should be denied an education, particularly for not having children! It is absurd, and it is discrimination against a large segment of our culture based solely upon a biological trait - a description that matches racism and sexism in its wrongness.
    Flag
  29. 79
    Name: B Eggleston on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 80
    Name: Caroline Foreman on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MD
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 81
    Name: Amy Becker on Sep 9, 2002
    State: KS
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 82
    Name: Sarah Clark on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Comments: I am in the same exact boat as you, except that I work full-time and go to school part-time. I too have been denied federal aid for school (B. A. English).
    Flag
  33. 83
    Name: Genny Rump on Sep 9, 2002
    State: VA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 84
    Name: Shawna Giellintine on Sep 9, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: good idea! I'm still struggling to put myself through college, and I get no help from the govt either, but for different reasons. (I'm under 25, and my parents make too much money, and according to the govt. my parents are supposed to pay my education) Good Luck!
    Flag
  35. 85
    Name: Jennifer Landry on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 86
    Name: Brenda Nelson on Sep 9, 2002
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments: It's time to end discrimination against the reproductively responsible in favor of the reproductively irresponsible! If you can't afford to pay for your own education, you can't afford to pay for having a child.
    Flag
  37. 87
    Name: Kelly O'Donnell on Sep 9, 2002
    State: NY
    Country: US
    Comments: I find it very sad that people who make an intelligent, worthwhile decision are being discriminated against in this way.
    Flag
  38. 88
    Name: Gilberto Colon on Sep 9, 2002
    State: NY
    Country: US
    Comments: I find it very sad that people who make an intelligent, worthwhile decision are being discriminated against in this way.
    Flag
  39. 89
    Name: Frances Grand Rapids on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MI
    Country:
    Comments: Non-breeders are more likely to be serious students and valuable contributors to the work force.
    Flag
  40. 90
    Name: Frances Gentile on Sep 9, 2002
    State: MI
    Country:
    Comments: Non-breeders are more likely to be serious students and valuable contributors to the work force.
    Flag
  41. 91
    Name: Suzie Que on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 92
    Name: Elaine Xavier on Sep 9, 2002
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 93
    Name: Melissa Eiben on Sep 9, 2002
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 94
    Name: Rhonda Light on Sep 9, 2002
    State: VA
    Country: US
    Comments: Why should we reward irresponsibility
    Flag
  45. 95
    Name: Debby Hanoka on Sep 9, 2002
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 96
    Name: Jim Lignugaris on Sep 9, 2002
    State: NJ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 97
    Name: Agata Rekas on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country: AU
    Comments: I was very lucky to have a free education, but I am horrified about inability of young talented people to continue their education if they cannot afford it financially. Especially those responsible, chosing a sustainable lifestyle should be rewarded, not discriminated.
    Flag
  48. 98
    Name: Hats 2953 on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country: CA
    Comments: The requirement that a married person must have a child in order to qualify for Federal Education Assistance sounds like discrimination to me.
    Flag
  49. 99
    Name: J Bean on Sep 9, 2002
    State: UT
    Country: US
    Comments: This is nothing short of discrimination against the childfree and childless.
    Flag
  50. 100
    Name: Wallianne Smith on Sep 10, 2002
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 »

Sponsored links