Sixth and Reily for Federal Courthouse

Signatures 756 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 16 › »

1. 101
   Name: Michelle Giovannini on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments: Leave downtown the way it is!!! We don't need our federal government coming into downtown Harrisburg, destroying our state capitol, almost making it a "3rd World City" by destroying the economic viability, closing businesses and eliminating jobs during a time when it's already a hard to survive and raise our families. You will end up with so many people on unemployment and welfare, you can take the welfare reform bill and toss it the wolves, and further hurt state and your own economic status by having to "take care of your own" due to foolish choices- save money and our State Capitol by building your court house at Sixth and Reily instead! Federal government should NOT have the right to just walk in and take over - PERIOD!!!

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Chet Runkle on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments: no federal courthouse downtown.

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Stephen Topper on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Lee York on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Monica Blazina on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Emily Oswald on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Kristen Gasbarre on Jul 31, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Eric Bischof on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: Do not ruin our prosperous downtown area. It has come so far. Please develop the parts of our city that need a project like this. Thank You!

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Emily Kerrison on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Sandy Bogdan on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: I am a Commerce customer and am in support of keeping Commerce downtown as it is. Build the courthouse on the Sixth & Reily site for NEW development and not tear down an established business.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Renee Haney on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Renee Haney on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Linda Arguedas on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Jay Dubina on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Craig Hummer on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Rachel Solomon on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Douglas Billet on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Steven Derise on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Tiffany Atkinson on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Tiffany Atkinson on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Tina Haas on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Andrew Johnson on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: I am not sure of the benefit to having the court house on Second Street. But the detriments seem fairly obvious. The acquisition of the property would: 1) Remove several business from downtown. 2) Remove Taxable real estate Downtown and Dauphin County. 3) Cost more taxpayer money to acquire either properties on Second Street. The acquisition of the properties would include the cost of real estate and lost revenues to all business displaced. 4) Disrupt the economic development on Second Street that was a focus of the Harrisburg Reginional Chamber of Commerce, City of Harrisburg, Downtown Improvement District and several other non profits.

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Tiffany Atkinson on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: John Yarnall on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Michael Jaeger on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: I find it hard to believe that there are no other options for the placement of the federal courthouse. I agree with other petitioners; businesses downtown should not be displaced. The arguments presented make sense. Officials need to re-evaluate their plan and come up with an alternative that limits disruption to major business and residential sections. The courthouse needs to be in an accessible location, not necessarily a prime location.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Jason Kirsch on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Adrienne Harper on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Jack Reiter on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Robert Mulrooney on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Michael Boyd on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Arlene Reiter on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Harriet Franklin on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: Please consider a site for the courthouse that will NOT destroy tax-revenue generating businesses and jobs in downtown Harrisburg!

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Kathy Mulrooney on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: I don't believe that the government should be able to come in to any town and decide where they want to put a courthouse. They should have to find an available place just like any other business out there.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Rocco Chieppa on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments: I agree with the above petition.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Karen Roberts on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Ashley Lloyd on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Roy Boylan on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Jodi Bezanill on Jul 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 16 › »