| # | First Name | Last Name | Comments |
|---|
| 551 | Lyle | Haskins | |
| 552 | Joshua | Benton | |
| 553 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 554 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 555 | Douglass | Thompson Leader | |
| 556 | Sam | Tucci | |
| 557 | Megan | Kurtz | |
| 558 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 559 | Christine | Lloyd | Sixth and Reily streets for the new federal courthouse in Harrisburg. |
| 560 | Ted | Fridirici | |
| 561 | Barbara | Colburn | To put the CT House in either of the two downtown locations would due irreparable harm to what is the heart of a very alive TAX PAYING downtown. The site at 6th and Riley is a common sense solution and the CT House would be beneficial to the area and provide an anchor to additional development for that area as well. It still would provide close access for the Feds to the other Fed Bldgs, without destroying vibrant tax paying business and changing for the worse downtown for ever. The disruption to the downtown area during construction would also go a long way to hurt or even destroy other near by businesses. The the downtown sites chosen make no sense at all. |
| 562 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 563 | William | Allen | |
| 564 | Joseph | Solomon | As a judge, I had to move my court 15 years ago. My only considerations were free public parking and accessibility. I never thought nearby amenities were essential for me to perform my duties. In fact, I recently refused an opportunity to move to a downtown county facility. GSA must not lose sight who this building is for. |
| 565 | Maria | Solomon | |
| 566 | David | Bixler | |
| 567 | Patti | Forker | |
| 568 | Kelly | Mease | I am all for the 6th & Riley new Courthouse. This would be a wonderful place, shutting down the drug dealers corners and so on. |
| 569 | John | Monn | |
| 570 | Ellen Brody | Hughes | |
| 571 | John | Goldsmith | |
| 572 | Gloria | Brougher | |
| 573 | Angela | Shevock | |
| 574 | Doris | Stillman | |
| 575 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 576 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 577 | Alex | Pribilla | |
| 578 | Carl | Marshall | |
| 579 | Rebecca | Susavidge | |
| 580 | Jamie | Ryons | |
| 581 | Francis | Salerno | The Sixth and Reily site is the most beneficial site
for all. |
| 582 | Anonymous | Anonymous | The business in downtown Harrisburg is good for their economy. You cause unneccessary stress on business if they have to move. |
| 583 | Angela | McCracken | |
| 584 | Andy | Spill | |
| 585 | barb | smetana | |
| 586 | Marge | Knapp | |
| 587 | Maureen | Spill | |
| 588 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 589 | Heather | Saxelby | |
| 590 | Elizabeth | Schaedler | |
| 591 | Anonymous | Anonymous | |
| 592 | Melissa | Bradbury | |
| 593 | Ashley | Groninger | |
| 594 | Tanya | Hoch | |
| 595 | Lisa | Kemes | |
| 596 | Chris | McPartland | |
| 597 | Mark | Stewart | I'm a former City resident and an attorney who practices law downtown. There is no need for the courthouse to be in the downtown, and many reasons not to place it at the proposed site. |
| 598 | Beth | Wiley | |
| 599 | Alfred | Walters | |
| 600 | judy | aims | Please use some LOGIC to make your decision and not take the tax revenue away from a City that is already coming up short on services. This is where I LIVE, not just a business opportunity. Please keep the residents in mind. |