We, the undersigned, acknowledge the worth of the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health which occuring on the dates August 15 through September 6, 2003.
We affirm our respect and gratitude for the strikers and their commitment and strength over twenty-two days of the fast. We acknowledge that they have pertinent and thus far un-addressed challenges as to the beliefs and practices of biopsychiatry, thus far, not addressed, and questioned by the strikers.
That psychotropic drugs, as claimed by biopsychiatry, carry no risk of provoking violence, addiction or physical harm and that they effect positive change.
That psychiatric disorders, as claimed by biopsychiatry, have a biological rather than circumstantial and environmental origin.
We assert that the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) or the Surgeon General have not answered the strikers\' request that they provide proof of these beliefs and pratices.
We believe that the one-page response by APA failed to answer the demands of the strikers, as noted by the scientific board, and that the critique of the board uncovered doubts to the claims of biopsychiatry even in the very texts reccomended by the APA as educational.
We join with the strikers to call for the above-named bodies to grant the revised demands of the hunger strikers issued by them on August 29, 2003...
That by November 1 of this year that the American Psychiatric Association (APA) shall:
1. Remark upon the scientific board\'s evaluation of the APA\'s one-page response in answer to the strikers\' seven challenges. The scientific board has rebuked the proofs given in the one-page response.
2. Hold a public meeting either face to face or by teleconference between representatives of the APA and representatives of the SCI.
We further express our hopes that consumers and survivors of the psychiatric system may soon have an equal degree of access to dialogue with the APA and the office of the Surgeon General already enjoyed by the pharmaceutical companies who manufacture such products as Paxil, Ritalin and Prozac and who have vested interest in maintaining the dogmas of biopsychiatry.
We declare that the recognition of this strikers\' request by the above-named parties will lead to increased accountability to the public and to positive change.
We state that we regard the axioms of biopsychiatry as dogma rather than fact.
And finally, we urge the above bodies to fufill the words of the Hippocratic oath, \"First shall you do no harm.\"
The sponors of the hunger strike.
The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights, a co-sponsor of the strike.
The original seven demands sent prior to the strike on July 28 to the APA, Surgeon General and NAMI:
Photos and short biographies of the core strikers and members of the scientific board assigned to evaluate any proof given.
A one-page response from the APA sent August 12:
The scientific board\'s comment on the APA\'s letter, with reference to the texts reccomended in that letter, sent on August 22: http://www.mindfreedom.org/mindfreedom/hungerstrike21.shtml
An updated request by the strikers here issued August 29:
The names and some short statements by the solidarity strikers.
Help spread the word about this petition. Copy the code below and paste it into your website or blog to help promote this petition.
Anti-biopsychiatry information as well as the other petition, for medical and psychological professionals. http://www.psychrights.org Sub-site of the Support Coalition with fast press releases and statements. http://www.mindfreedom.org/mindfreedom/hungerstrike.shtml Photo documentation of the fast. http://www.cinemaniastigma.com/pages/13/index.htm Proof that now everyone has their very own blog... http://mindfreedom-fast.blogspot.com/ The most well-known member of the the Scientific Board. http://www.breggin.com
The views expressed in this petition are solely those of the petition's sponsor and do not in any way reflect the views of iPetitions. iPetitions is solely a provider of technical services to the petition sponsor and cannot be held liable for any damages or injury or other harm arising from this petition. In the event no adequate sponsor is named, iPetitions will consider the individual account holder with which the petition was created as the lawful sponsor.