Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 47 total

Page: 1

  1. 1
    Name: James LaMarr on Mar 11, 2003
    State: MO
    Country: US
    Comments: The big reeason is that they know once an hispanic is placed on the court then that seat will forevermore be the hispanic seat and they won't have an opertunity to place a liberal hispanic for 30 years.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Michael Bixler on Mar 11, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Margaret E. Bixler on Mar 11, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Michael R. Kornegay on Mar 11, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments: Miguel Estrada deserves a vote, not a filibuster.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Michael Welch on Mar 12, 2003
    State: NJ
    Country: US
    Comments: Knock off the antics already. There is so much that needs to be taken of and instead precious time is spent blocking a man qualified for the position. Do your jobs and stop the games!
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Ken Kwast on Mar 13, 2003
    State: SC
    Country: US
    Comments: Who would have thought that a filabuster would be in place on a well qualified candidate of his descent. Where did all the "equal opportunity" democrats disappear to
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: David Leonard on Mar 13, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Chris Estopinal on Mar 13, 2003
    State: LA
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Jeffery S. Anderson, M.D. on Mar 13, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments: It is shameful that the Democratic leadership continues to embrace the politics of personal destruction. Mr. Estrada is an eminently qualified candidate for judge. Under the current affirmative action policies he would have EXTRA weight as a candidate due to his heritage. Stop interfering with the appointment of President Bush's candidates.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Jeffrey Kornegay on Mar 13, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments: Stop the filibuster and give the man a vote!
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Michele Kornegay on Mar 13, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments: Estrada deserves a vote.
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Kim Doege on Mar 13, 2003
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Kay & Craig Taylor on Mar 13, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Thomas Mazur on Mar 14, 2003
    State: TX
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Griffith Parker on Mar 15, 2003
    State: MO
    Country: US
    Comments: I thinks our founder would be very discussed with the way congress is acting. Senators please go back and read the Federalist Paper.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Kurt Nielsen on Mar 18, 2003
    State: NJ
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Marilyn Wilcox on Mar 19, 2003
    State: KS
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Leslie Smith on Mar 26, 2003
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments: A warning! Some of us rallied voters in the last election do to your poor behavior. I for one will not forget this in the next one.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Jeffrey Pierce on Apr 4, 2003
    State: IN
    Country: US
    Comments: Stop the madness. You lost the elections! Ever stop and ask yourselves why Perhaps it is because of your views and ideologies. Perhaps many of the voters that turned out actually WANT judicial reform. Not that any of you liberals would ever consider the will of the people anyway.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Frank Cataldo on Apr 9, 2003
    State: NJ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Bob Magart on Apr 28, 2003
    State: MT
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Zach Croft on May 1, 2003
    State: SC
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Margit Delin on May 4, 2003
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I have become so dissapointed in the Democratic party and what you now seem to stand for. In fact, I no longer have a clue what you stand for. I urge you to stop this filibuster. I pray that the democratic party can again find compassion, ethics, moral clarity and a desire to do good for the american people and to be an example to the world. I have faith that you will be able to find the soul of the Democratic party once again. Thank you.
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Paula Exum on May 13, 2003
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Mike Dueringer on May 21, 2003
    State: GA
    Country: US
    Comments: Why does your party continue to hurt America
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Lou Kalinowski on Aug 7, 2003
    State: MI
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Terri Adsit on Aug 12, 2003
    State: WI
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Bryan Rosenberg on Aug 17, 2003
    State: NC
    Country: US
    Comments: Change the rules on filibusters. We need and want an up or down vote on the nominees.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Donna Cowan on Sep 14, 2003
    State: OK
    Country: US
    Comments: This is disgusting, this filibuster. It is a perfect example of how you are all for democracy except when it means you are not in power. Like the Democrats in Texas, you will do what is wrong because to you the end justifies the means to you. It
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Terry Barnes on Sep 15, 2003
    State: KS
    Country: US
    Comments: I want an up or down vote on these nominees, I'm sick and tired of this non-stop filibuster baloney. Partisan politics should stop and constituent represetation should begin.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Maria L Weiss on Oct 31, 2003
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Comments: All of President Bush's nominees are highly qualified and it is wrong to use the filibuster process because they have a different view than yourself.
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Chris Edwards on Oct 31, 2003
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: I am disturbed to see these purely partisan actions. What ever happened to doing what's best for the country, or the will of the people. Too often our leaders are too concerned about their party or personal hatred to stop and listen to the people. Enough is enough.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Kerwin Nygren on Nov 16, 2003
    State: KS
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Ruth Torres on Nov 21, 2003
    State: TX
    Country:
    Comments: i miss you its maria
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Kyle Rice on Mar 26, 2004
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: G Hil on Jun 20, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Leslie Sullivan on Oct 18, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Debbie Nalle on Oct 31, 2004
    State: MO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Christopher Pudelko on Nov 16, 2004
    State: NY
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Paul Carver on Mar 23, 2005
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Mike Moran on Apr 18, 2005
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Dustin Weisman on Apr 24, 2005
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: John Freeman on Apr 26, 2005
    State: MI
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Yarymarie Cardenas on May 9, 2005
    State: MN
    Country: US
    Comments: This country was founded on a strong belief and faith. Let's keep it that way.
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Justin McCann on May 12, 2005
    State: CT
    Country:
    Comments: If a simple majority is not the manner by which judges are to be Constitutionally appointed, wouldn't the framers have inserted "provided two thirds of the Senators present concur" after the statement regarding the appointment of judges Why would they be so explicit regarding Treaties and be so otherwise sloppy, or at least not thorough, as to exclude similar language, regarding the appointment of judges, Ambassadors, etc... I think it further clarified that they did not intend the appointment of judges to be subject to a supermajority by virtue of the inclusion of "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," in both clauses. That they duplicated this statement, but did not do the same with "provided two thirds of the Senators present concur", clarifies the non-mutual intent of each clause.
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Ed Patterson on May 21, 2005
    State: AL
    Country: US
    Comments: A minority of this country does not have the right to violate the wishes of the majority. "Majority rules" is the foundation of our law and the consititution. ideology is not constitutional grounds to determine if judicial nominees are suitable. a super majority vote on presidentual nominees is a power grab and the filibusters are illegal in my opinion. back to the constitution and majority rule. stop all judicial appointee filibusters.
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Dmnv Wmqljvxd Dmnv Wmqljvxd on Sep 8, 2007
    State: AL
    Country: US
    Comments: uxgir xlfut ulskq sxajfleuh fxhpbimwu saqzn lfribqvn
    Flag

Page: 1

Sign Petition Now!

Sponsored links