ENOUGH IS ENOUGH - EPA LEAVE DIMOCK ALONE

Signatures 240 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 151
   Name: Mark Sommer on Feb 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Tino Hammid on Feb 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Edward Allen Bordinger on Feb 6, 2012

   Comments: Enough is Enough ! The DEC is the experts. let them do their job .!

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Edward Allees on Feb 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Kimberly More on Feb 6, 2012

   Comments: Please refer to the Marcellus Shale Reality Tour Part 3 EPA comes to Dimock (DOC-742456). Why were there no fact checks preformed on the story and why is CNN endorsing this? Also please answer why CNN iReport associate producer, elchueco, approved this story?

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Karen Patricia Matusic on Feb 7, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Why Cant Cabot Drill/Frack In The Nine Mile on Feb 7, 2012

   Comments: This comment was deleted on 2012-08-19 09:59:02

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Robert M. Streahle on Feb 7, 2012

   Comments: This was completed by the DEP. I feel it is completely for political reasons that another agency the EPA. has now decided to reopen this issue. The EPA we have seen here and other states put out one sided incomplete information before facts are known. I do not believe that they are impartial as seen here and other states..

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: L & C Blasetti on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Ralph A. Saggiomo on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments: There is no drilling in our area and we have methane in our water & it has been there way before the drilling started

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Richard Downey on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments: I've been in Dimock several time, talked to people along Carter Rd. I admire the job the PADEP did in forcing compliance. Let them do their job.

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Amanda Rispoli on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Sherry on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments: For all those who question why Dimock residents do not want EPA involvement, please research their involvement and overstepping their bounds with the Texas Railroad Commission and Range Resources last year (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704461304576216683622068802.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs) and the recent disapproval by a US House of Representatives subcommittee of the EPAs handling of the Pavillion WY preliminary report here: http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/HHRG-112-SY20-WState-H001052-20120201.pdf. We want answers as to why the EPA is investigating when they have refused the water treatment systems which were a part of the Settlement Agreement handed down by PA DEP.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Earl G. Lesch on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments: Please end this charade in whatever way possible. The good people of Dimock need to get on with their lives need to stop having their town falsely ridiculed.

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Dave Parker on Feb 7, 2012

    Comments: enough is enough !!

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Dick And Wilma Grimsley on Feb 8, 2012

    Comments: Get it on with what the gas company started. Most of the residents are for it and their water is safe.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Robin Smith-Lutz on Feb 8, 2012

    Comments: We need to win the war for energy independence. This is a local matter. Stay out of it! Thank you

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: John Jenkins on Feb 8, 2012

    Comments: Give these people clean water to drink NOW!!

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Karen Visavati on Feb 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Loren Salsman on Feb 9, 2012

    Comments: My treatment system works great. My water is better than it was pre-drill and we drink it every day.

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Chris Salmon on Feb 10, 2012

    Comments: We've had enough of the propaganda by people trying to gain money through the courts.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Leah R Taylor on Feb 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anne Teel on Feb 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Matthew J. TRoy III on Feb 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Linda Perella on Feb 12, 2012

    Comments: These Carter Road people have been given by the State of PA and Cabot the ability to be made whole again but they turned it down. What do these people want? Millions of dollars per person? I grew up in Dimock and am very aware of the problems long before the State and Cabot entered the picture. I agree ENOUGH is ENOUGH!

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Ted Breslau on Feb 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Alan Nelson on Feb 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Kyla Daly on Feb 15, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Kyla Daly on Feb 15, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Margit Allison on Feb 17, 2012

    Comments: HEY, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Paul Allison on Feb 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Charles Welles IV on Feb 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Greg Hamill on Feb 26, 2012

    Comments: This kind of thing makes me very upset. Move on for God sake.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: SONDRA BAUERNFEIND on Feb 27, 2012

    Comments: It seems that there is a group who refuse to honor the Constitutional rights of citizens who may have a different opinion as those who are anti-drilling for natural gas. Using legal services of a 501(c)3 corporation which is not abiding by the regulations determined by the IRS for tax exempt 501(c)3 corporation, these opponents to drilling have been using Dimick, PA as the " bad example " in other public meetings in New York State. Several townships in Sullivan County, New York have changed their zoning laws based on the advice of this husband and wife legal team. Dimick, PA has been cited as an example as to the dangers associated with gas drilling.

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Tammie Wilkes on Feb 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Laurie Hunsinger on Feb 27, 2012

    Comments: Enough is Enough I reside in Dimock twp. nothing wrong here... Those 11 people should have taken the deal and moved away if they don't like it here.

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Inge Grafe-kieklak on Feb 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Bryant La Tourette on Feb 29, 2012

    Comments: EPA can you test my water and while I wait can you send me some free water. I understand the EPA is now helping RESIDENTIAL HOME OWNERS. I have no Drilling near by but the earth has given me sulfur water.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Ann Marie Jennings on Feb 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Pamela Marshall on Feb 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Jim on Feb 29, 2012

    Comments: EPA, I'm looking for my rebate. Before the gas drilling even started, we spent $879.00 for a sediment filter, an iron filter, and a water softener. Now our water's great and you didn't even have to come here to do anything. Let me know when my rebate check will arrive. P.S. By the way, we now have 4 gas wells within 1,000 feet of our house. Guess what - no water problems!!!

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Fred Weiss on Feb 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Paul Kelly on Mar 1, 2012

    Comments: enough

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: John Krohn on Mar 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Jim Haggart on Mar 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Raymond G Kneisley on Mar 3, 2012

    Comments: It's time to use our GOD-given resources and stop playing political games.

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Jason Horn on Mar 3, 2012

    Comments: I believe the EPA should keep their nose out of our business I live in the 9 square mile area and its the same here as its always been. I know people that could light their water on fire for years.

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Jennifer Horn on Mar 3, 2012

    Comments: Tell the Epa to go home and leave us alone

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »