Signatures 755 total
-
1
Name: Paul Bennett on May 28, 2007Comments: The new age restriction will hit a league that was fast approaching what was sure to be its most promising season. This cannot be allowed to happen.Flag
-
2
Name: Barry Stubbs on May 28, 2007Comments: This league was looking to be the most competitive it has been in quite a while next season. Don't ruin it!!Flag
- 3
-
4
Name: Hockey Algeria on May 28, 2007Comments: Im not sure this rule exists in any other league in the world.Flag
- 5
- 6
-
7
Name: June Healy on May 28, 2007Comments: This ruling seems the best way to end the popularity of a developing sport in this country. We do not have the vast pool of players of the US teams.Flag
- 8
- 9
-
10
Name: Anonymous on May 28, 2007Comments: Crazy uttter Crazy, just as the league was going to be an even better one, this happens. Lets hope the idiots that made this decision change their minds and very soon. RETHINK YOUR DECISION AND QUICKFlag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on May 28, 2007Comments: Crazy uttter Crazy, just as the league was going to be an even better one, this happens. Lets hope the idiots that made this decision change their minds and very soon. RETHINK YOUR DECISION AND QUICKFlag
-
12
Name: Gary Coomes on May 28, 2007Comments: Ill conceived, age discriminate ridiculous idea. Sport should be trying to get more people in to it not alienating them.Flag
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
-
17
Name: James Glenn on May 28, 2007Comments: With the recent changes to junior ice hockey this is the last thing the sport needs. Youngers need older players to help them along. If they implement this where will these players go, surely its jst limiting the numbers of people that can play the game we all love.Flag
-
18
Name: Luke Fisher on May 28, 2007Comments: The EIHA could at least put this to a vote of the clubs- if they agree to it, then fine.Flag
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
22
Name: Christopher Harper on May 28, 2007Comments: I fully the supoort the development of youngsters but this will ruin the leagueFlag
-
23
Name: Christopher Harper on May 28, 2007Comments: I fully the supoort the development of youngsters but this will ruin the leagueFlag
-
24
Name: Andrew Parkinson on May 28, 2007Comments: Leave the ENL alone! The league has been steadily been getting better every year with competition in the last season being particularly fierce. Why not keep the ENL and introduce a new league specifically for under 25s, under 23s or under 21sFlag
-
25
Name: Gary Dent on May 28, 2007Comments: Ill thought out, unnecessary and counter-productive. A little consultation with those effected could improve the EIHA's decision-making immeasurably.Flag
-
26
Name: David Trevallion on May 28, 2007Comments: Another knee jerk reaction from the dictarorship that is the EIHA. This new ruling will little thought to the players that this rulling will effectivly be forced out of the game, just because they are now over 25 but either not quite good enough or can not commit to a higher league. Any decision of this nature should be voted on at an AGM or EGM by the member clubs that it effects.Flag
- 27
-
28
Name: Andy Webster on May 28, 2007Comments: yet another decision taken with out asking the players involved.development should be till 18.then they have to fight for a place on ability not getting it for free because of age.Flag
-
29
Name: Anita Slater on May 28, 2007Comments: this is a joke i dont think this has been looked at by anyone sensible the eiha need to put some money back in to hockey and show they care about our players.Flag
-
30
Name: Dave Lake on May 28, 2007Comments: makes no sense at 26 and finished with the game how many teams will find 20 players aged between 19 and 25 years of age.who will this benefit certainly not the fans or the players.Flag
-
31
Name: Wayne Slater on May 28, 2007Comments: What an absolute load of rubbish these rulings are!Flag
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
-
37
Name: Darryl Morvan on May 28, 2007Comments: I believe this to be an ill-advised and ill-thoughout decision which should be quashed immediately. Any decision of this magnitude should involve a consultative process with the membership - not a dictatorial edict.Flag
-
38
Name: Darryl Morvan on May 28, 2007Comments: I believe this to be an ill-advised and ill-thoughout decision which should be quashed immediately. Any decision of this magnitude should involve a consultative process with the membership - not a dictatorial edict.Flag
- 39
-
40
Name: Leigh Williams on May 28, 2007Comments: A very poorly thought-out decision by the EIHA that will effectively curtail the opportunity for a huge number of people to play the game they love at a competetive level.Flag
- 41
- 42
-
43
Name: Sue Ford on May 28, 2007Comments: why should player over 25 not be allowed some people have given their commitment to clubs for years and for many reasons have stayed at this level of hockey and you will push them out because they are over 25 but still good enough to play that is discrimination and just plain stupid how are kids ever going to get interested if once you reach a certain age its goodbye you should think again. not everyone 25 and over has the money to compete in other leagues or the clubs nearby and most people by that age have commitments house family ect and want to play for a local team.Flag
-
44
Name: Andy Hobday on May 28, 2007Comments: Encouraging younger players is fine, but restricting the older more experienced players in this way is riduculous.Flag
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
-
50
Name: Warren Cook on May 28, 2007Comments: Absoutely stupidity, and almost certainly detrimental to British hockey... if these sorts of rules come in then I am likely to just give up following hockey in the UK and just follow a professionally run sport.Flag