CPSIA Impacts on Children's Apparel Industry

Signatures 21989 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440 › »

1. 21751
   Name: Kathryn Baker on Sep 6, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 21752
   Name: Kristen Saad on Sep 7, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 21753
   Name: Paula Frankel on Sep 9, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 21754
   Name: Anonymous on Sep 12, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 21755
   Name: Vanessa Luehrsen on Sep 12, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 21756
   Name: Kate Nowland on Sep 13, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 21757
   Name: Alon Picker on Sep 13, 2009

   Comments: This is outrageous and does NOT make any sense to apply to cloths.

   Flag
8. 21758
   Name: Jaqcquie Barker on Sep 13, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 21759
   Name: Dani on Sep 15, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 21760
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 21761
    Name: Stacey Wright on Sep 18, 2009

    Comments: This law needs to be refined, as it stands now its killing small arts and crafts businesses.

    Flag
12. 21762
    Name: Amanda Fincher on Sep 18, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 21763
    Name: Maria Iske on Sep 20, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 21764
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 21, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 21765
    Name: Jennifer Ankerson on Sep 21, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 21766
    Name: Beverly Murray on Sep 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 21767
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 28, 2009

    Comments: Change this law

    Flag
18. 21768
    Name: Liisa B. Wilson, President LB Wilson Custom Clothing on Sep 29, 2009

    Comments: This opressive legislation will put many small designers and manufacturers such as myself out of business. Gone will be the start-ups, the innovators, the small business that is supposedly the backbone of the US economy.

    Flag
19. 21769
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 21770
    Name: Jill Voicheck on Oct 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21771
    Name: Heather Graef on Oct 1, 2009

    Comments: I have been planning to design one-of a kind apparel for young children, and will not be able to do this if testing each item is required. There is no way independent clothing designers will survive a law like this.

    Flag
22. 21772
    Name: Lindsay Brotzman on Oct 8, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 21773
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 21774
    Name: Bren Smith on Oct 9, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 21775
    Name: Alyson Allen on Oct 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 21776
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 21777
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 12, 2009

    Comments: This is horrific. It will destroy my business as well as countless other businesses.

    Flag
28. 21778
    Name: Carisa Green on Oct 12, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 21779
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 12, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 21780
    Name: Kate Zinzi on Oct 12, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 21781
    Name: Daniel & Cindy Rijo on Oct 13, 2009

    Comments: The redundancy of testing the component by the manufacturer of the article of clothing and NOT the manufacturer of the component is absolute lunacy. For example, I use Velcro in one of the hats we manufacture. However , that Velcro from that one particular lot will be tested hundreds of time if not thousands of times when it in fact needed to be tested only once; AT THE TIME IT WAS MANUAFACTURED IN THE VELCOR MANUFACTORING FACILITY. And why on earth would you be required to test the same lot of Velcro on different styles or sizes I fully support that we need to know for the safety of our children the lead level, but the legislation has to have common sense to it. If this is not changed, like many others we will no longer make children clothing, and the direct loss of jobs will occur. I expect better than this from my tax dollars!

    Flag
32. 21782
    Name: Melanie Christman on Oct 16, 2009

    Comments: Change this law!!!

    Flag
33. 21783
    Name: Melanie Christman on Oct 17, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 21784
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 19, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 21785
    Name: Denise Snow on Oct 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 21786
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 26, 2009

    Comments: This is insane!

    Flag
37. 21787
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 28, 2009

    Comments: I thought we were trying to rebuild the economy not knock it down a notch....this is a horrible way to screw small business owners.

    Flag
38. 21788
    Name: Surender on Oct 29, 2009

    Comments: i m product safety coordinater in spl industries ltd

    Flag
39. 21789
    Name: Jaime Couture on Oct 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 21790
    Name: Kaui MacDonald Porche on Nov 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 21791
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 21792
    Name: Michael Young on Nov 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 21793
    Name: Sam Powell on Nov 30, 2009

    Comments: Please please, reconsider what you are doing to small business who already comply with these standards and still you do not accept them.

    Flag
44. 21794
    Name: Lora Powell on Nov 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 21795
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 21796
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 21797
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 21798
    Name: Lyndsay Sargent on Dec 16, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 21799
    Name: Christine Vuksanaj on Dec 17, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 21800
    Name: Alisha on Dec 18, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440 › »