Say NO to SMR\'s routes for Major Transmission Line

Signatures 141 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 101
   Name: James Dickason on Oct 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Kathleen Dickason on Oct 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Steve Bond on Oct 22, 2007

   Comments: 1. 100 ft FPL transmission lines will ruin the rural effect of the whole area. A similar phone tower has already been turned down by the county planners as it would have had a devastating effect on the area. 2. Safety is another issue as we have low flying aircraft in this area that fly at night - these poles would not be light. 3. In the UK it has been proven that these transmission lines hugely increase the risk of cancer , particularly for children. 4. There in no need to waste money in rerouting these lines when FPL have already chosen a route that has the least effect

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Valerie Esposito on Oct 22, 2007

   Comments: Our neighborhoods are already established with power needs established. FPL is aware of this and that is why the suggested route is purposed.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Robert Coates on Oct 23, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Deborah McCabe on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments: These lines are unhealthy and will decrease my property values in an already down market.

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Lewis McCabe on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments: These line will run through an environmentally sensitive area which we as homeowners have worked hard to protect

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments: These lines will destroy the beauty of this rural area. They should run where they not not bother esisting homes

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Susan Wade on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Fredrick Wade on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Stewart Wade on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Sophie Pembleton on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Shaan Pembleton on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Debra Upchurch on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Patricia McKeithen on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Joshua Grubbs on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments: SMR can change it's future development plans but I can't move my home. I agree with FPL preferred route.

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Jack Robbins on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Steve & Luanne Halbrook on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: RICK TURNER on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Brain (Bob) Upchurch on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Robert Bellino on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Helen E. Birakis on Oct 23, 2007

    Comments: FPL does not serve us; Peace River Electric does, and we already have their power lines in front or our homes. We don't want yet another electric company's gigantic poles and lines diminishing the quality of our rural life and the value of our properties. Let FPL's lines affect those they serve, not us. SMR is NOT more important than we individual citizens are...unless government allows them to be. Please don't let this happen!

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Chad Smith on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments: SMR's only concern is $$$ and what is going on in LWR, nothing else.

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Ronald Alan Hunniford on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments: FPL listened to the people of Manatee County in 2006 and respectively selected the appropriate preferred route for the Bobwhite-Manatee 230Kv Transmission Line. The preferred route impacts the fewest homes and will be least impacted by any future roadway development. SMR regardless of their money should not be considered the "majority voice".

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Alexander G. Smith on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Cynthia L. Smith on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Blake A. Smith on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Katherine M Smith on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Kristina Miller on Oct 24, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Michael J. Koch on Oct 25, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: David Turner on Oct 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 31, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Susanne Palmer on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Lisa Messenger on Nov 8, 2007

    Comments: I support FPLs preferred route for the Bobwhite Manatee Major Transmission Line and Oppose the alternate routes proposed by Schroeder-Manatee Ranch!!

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Ronald W. Messenger on Nov 8, 2007

    Comments: No to SMR alternate routes!!!

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3