Say NO to SMR\'s routes for Major Transmission Line

Signatures 141 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Susan Schoettle-Gumm on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Richard Gumm on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments: No SMR alternates!

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Susan Schoettle-Gumm on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments: Protect our existing homes and environment!!

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Eileen Fitzgerald on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments: Schroeder-Manatee Ranch is NOT being a good neighbor.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Robin Blaikie on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Robert E. Hueter on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Kittie L. Chapman on Oct 15, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Erik Rossiter on Oct 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Wendy Rossiter on Oct 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: J Rosen on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: ANN FORREST on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: VERY MUCH AGAINST THE SMR PROPOSED ROUTES.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Charles Matson on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Andrew Wilford on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Clark & Linda Trautweiler on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Dirk Ilsink on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: Due to the lower property values of the homes near the transmission lines, the taxable values will also be significantly reduced resulting in lower county income! That is an immediate result while the future developments will have no immediate effect on the county budget.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Cheryl Castillo on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Lee Byron on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: Please preserve our rural lifestyle. I and my family have lived east of 75 off Fruitville for 28 years. New residents should not take precedence over existing, long-term neighborhoods.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: H.J. Khella on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: NO TO SMR - They need the additional energy - they should support it on their land.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Wayne Kinney on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Richard Walden on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: I oppose the alternate routes proposed by Schroeder-Manatee Ranch (SMR).

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Lynn Clement on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Robert Long on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: RON FISHKIND on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: JoAnne Schwartz on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: Let existing home owners have a say not future home owners. and I say FPL prefered route.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Michael Hutchinson on Oct 16, 2007

    Comments: Please uphold the original FPL route!

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Kent Adams on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: Support FPL plan as submiitted due to lowest impact on homes

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Bruce Lewis on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: This line is primarily to benefit SMR's "planned" growth, yet they don't want the power line crossing their empty land. They believe it is fair to inflict the line -- and possible health effects and definite property value declines -- on already-built homes and neighborhoods. Let's have some fairness and common sense in this issue!

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Cynthia Lewis on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Runar Sigurdsson on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Jeremy Carter on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: We already live in Manatee County, pay taxes and vote. Our area is one of natural beauty to be preserved. The FLP preferred route is clearly designed to inconvenience as few residents as possible and to impact preserve areas as little as possible: it should be adhered to.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: James Festa on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Bouziane, Alan on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Caryl Bouziane on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Bouziane, David on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Douglas W Mccaw on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Karen McCaw on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: I agree with the route proposed by FPL, not the one being proposed by SMR that brings the poles in Fruitville Rd from Verna Rd.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Michael R. Murphy on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Susanne Stovall on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Michael Sporer on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Johanna &Richard Iracane on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: Please protect our homes and children from the high voltage wires - we need to live not die

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Terry & Michele Bowling on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: ROBERT O. SINCLAIR III on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Pamela Scoggins on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: I do NOT want to look out of my windows at a transmission pole of this size. Nor do I want to drive under it every time I come and go from my home. It is not right to place a transmission line such as this in people's neighborhoods!

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: JOHN L. SMELSER on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: DEBBIE J. SMELSER on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Joseph R. Vislay on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: LORI SINCLAIR on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Gabrielle & Todd Kirchman on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Jessica Lowe on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: NO to SMR's routes for Major Transmission Line

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Kathy Gustafson on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3