Signatures 1047 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 21 › »
-
151
Name: Wayne Fernicola on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: Michael Lebron on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Debra Steinfeld on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Debra Steinfeld on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: James Emery on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
156
Name: Pat Sewell on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Too much info to read in 60 days, thanks.Flag
-
157
Name: Anonymous on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
158
Name: Kevin Gref on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Please fully consider a request to extend the public comment period in order to review the regulations posed to protect us from environmental hazards that could greatly affect the lives of the citizens of this region.Flag
-
159
Name: Geoffrey Arnold on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
160
Name: Adam Hait on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Please extend the public comment period. 60 days is way too short and feels like public officials trying to force this through before anyone knows about it!!! That is unfair and under handed!! Thank youFlag
-
161
Name: Murrietta Lee on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
162
Name: Linda Blyer on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
163
Name: Marcia J. Sikowitz on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
164
Name: Richard Evans on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Once you put poisons in ground water, they are there forever, and nothing can be done about it.Flag
-
165
Name: Anne Hart on Oct 24, 2009Comments: In addition to the inadequate time allowed for public comment, it is especially disturbing that cumulative impacts are not addressed. This a critical issue.Flag
-
166
Name: Richar Ross on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Such a vital threat to our entire lifestyle and environment deserves a full airing of opinionsFlag
-
167
Name: William Baines on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
168
Name: Cathy Farris on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Money is NOT the first and foremost important matter. We need all the info, and so far, most of it has been bad, bad, bad!Flag
-
169
Name: Jennifer Grimes on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Please keep the protection of the watershed the top priority.Flag
-
170
Name: Christine Parrow on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
171
Name: Bruce Harnett on Oct 24, 2009Comments: I think that something with such long term consequences should be given a really good look. To push through the untested process of Fracturing really needs to be looked at from all sides not just the mining and mineral department.Flag
-
172
Name: Jill Leighty on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
173
Name: Zeke Boyle on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
174
Name: Ford Prime on Oct 24, 2009Comments: It irresponsible to give less than 120 days for the public to respond to a question as critical this.Flag
-
175
Name: Benjamin Harnett on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
176
Name: Sue Young on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
177
Name: Sue Young on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
178
Name: John Sapanaro on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
179
Name: Anonymous on Oct 24, 2009Comments: The magnitude of potential problems as a consequence of gas drilling warrants the granting of an extension for public comment. Anticipating problems and developing strategies to prevent them are preferable to experiencing problems and then seeking what could practically be only partial remediation.Flag
-
180
Name: Erica Hart on Oct 24, 2009Comments: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. WHAT IS THJE BIG RUSH OUR LIVES ARE AT STAKE!!!Flag
-
181
Name: Howard Hart on Oct 24, 2009Comments: It is essential that you extend the public comment period- and totally irresponsible of you not to.Flag
-
182
Name: Alan Davino on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
183
Name: Calin Riffle on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Nadia Steinzor on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
185
Name: Harold J Carley on Oct 24, 2009Comments: The comment period needs to be extended. The gas companies and some people will make some money but if problems with our water supply occur the greater populous will be the ones stuck with bill for remediation, assuming there is one.Flag
-
186
Name: George A. Misner on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
187
Name: Anonymous on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Please extend the comment period at least another 60days to give people time to get independent opinion on the regulations needed before gas drilling of the gas-rich Marcellus Shale deposit is permitted.Flag
-
188
Name: Otto Frederick Onasch on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
189
Name: David Cromwell on Oct 24, 2009Comments: We need to know the specific toxins and chemicals to be used in hydraulic fracturing. The drilling companies are refusing to release this essential info...Flag
-
190
Name: Bruce L. Brown on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
191
Name: Sue Doig on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
192
Name: Rev. Jim Davis on Oct 24, 2009Comments: The point that the majority of Natural gas on todays market comes from arrid high plains in Texas north to central Canada. Given that surface waters in those areas are so very few and far between, that gives the comapnies involved much more response time when an accident happens than we would ever have here in the NorthEast!Flag
-
193
Name: James Hynes on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
194
Name: Kathryn Tufano on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
195
Name: Laura Neiman on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: Thomas P. Noonan on Oct 24, 2009Comments: Please extend the period of comment and give the citizens of NYS our right to ask questions of the head of DEC as well as the authors of the Gas Drilling Draft Regulations. Thank you, TOM NOONANFlag
-
197
Name: Adrienne Eisenberg on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
198
Name: Chelsea Mozen on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
199
Name: Linda Jones on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
200
Name: Judith Wells on Oct 24, 2009Comments:Flag