Dr. Seralini - Please release data from your biotech corn study

Signatures 765 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 16 › »

1. 101
   Name: Jean-Pierre Zryd on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments: non need for comment

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Chris Kelly on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Olga Sayanova on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Anja Matzk on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Petra Sprick on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: K. K. Narayanan on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments: I am keen to see the raw data to make sure that the conclusions of the paper are justified.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Dr. Elke Duwenig on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Prof. Dr. Habil. Manfred Neumann on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: S. Klages-Büchner on Sep 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Narender Nehra on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anastasia Bodnar on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Roy Mootoosamy on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: These data must be shown to the scientific community to clarify any existing questions, and also to guide future work. I.e. following the scientific method!

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Christine Kastner on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Tomasz Twardowski on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Dee Rawsthorne on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Gabriel Leon on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Uwe Schrader on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: Be responsible and share the data

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Andreas Heise on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Steven Vandenabeele on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Marieke Louwers on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Dr Penny Sparrow on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: László Sági on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Isabel Nuyttens on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: Dr. Séralini has used questionable statistics and methods in previously published papers and hence his conclusions clearly biased towards his own opinions rather than facts. If dr. Séralini can make outrageous claims without releasing the data, science has really become a travesty.

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Alejandro Rojas on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Dr. Oliver Schmitz on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Dr. Stefan Rauschen on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Bojin Bojinov on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Charles Spillane on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: Please disclose all of the raw data in accordance with scientific norms and process.

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Polgári Dávid on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Máté Varga on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Alrun Burgmeier on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: The raw data will make it easier to reproduce the results and to judge it's value.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: David Wurbs on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Manuel Pedro Salema Fevereiro on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Margarida Teixeira Santos on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Margarida Teixeira Santos on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Toby Bruce on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: The shocking tumours also occur in untreated Sprague-Dawley rats. Suzuki et al. (1979; J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 95:187-96. http://goo.gl/2rjjU ) found that 81% of female Sprague-Dawley rats develop tumors after 2 years, even if no treatments are applied. Choosing rats that naturally get tumours and then having a small number of control individuals and a much larger number of treatment ones mean that your data need to be considered with caution.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Jorge Paiva on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Dale Sanders on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: The data as presented appear not to stand up to statistical scrutiny without release of withheld data. Please release them in the interests of scientific transparency.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: C Kameswara Rao on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: Raw data are very much necessary to evaluate the veracity of the claims made by the author(s). Refusal to provide them casts a shadow on the highly controversial conclusions widely publicized.

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Prof. Dr. G. Krczal on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Hue on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Professor Anthony Trewavas FRS on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: keep a rat in a cage and it usually dies of cancer. It has been known for over 70 years that the prevalence of spontaneously produced tumours requiring no stiumulus in small (

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Marianne Heselmans on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: As science journalist, writing about such a difficult science field,I have a stake in full data access.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Peter Davies on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Paulo Paes De Andrade on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Leila Dos Santos Macedo on Sep 24, 2012

    Comments: The Biosafety Societies need to have complete data on the experiment to make their conclusions. Hundred of previous studies have proved this modification to be safe. Millions of people and animals have been feed with this maize for more than 10 years without a single health problem. The methodology used in this study is very questionable and disseminate these results without confirmation can cause terrible damage to the development of DNA technology in emerging countries. Who will pay for that?

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 16 › »