To: Dr. Giles Éric Séralini
From: The undersigned members of the scientific community
Re: Your paper in Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2012
Your recent paper in Food and Chemical Toxicology has elicited unprecedented levels of interest around the world. Yet, invoking lack of space, much of the data were not published.
Accordingly, we the undersigned members of the scientific community, invoke the following clause from Elsevier (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/rights):
Data access and retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
and urge you to make every effort to release all the data. Given the attention and implications of your work, we appeal that you make every effort to make such a release practicable as soon as possible. Only a full disclosure of the data can quell any uncertainties over the results you published.
Updates
Reached 500 supporters
September 27, 2012
Reached 100 supporters
September 24, 2012
September 23, 2012
I am honestly overwhelmed by how many of you have joined this call for transparency. We are just a few signatures away from the hundred mark and your momentum is the only reason we have gotten this far.
8 Comments
S
Sue
12 years ago
Featured
It is completely disgusting and a discredit to serious science that this important study has been unethically retracted. It is vital that the information in this study is widely available to everyone.
S
sarah Riley
13 years ago
Featured
WE DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT IS IN OUR FOOD. RELEASE THE DATA NOW.
D
david Vogel
13 years ago
Featured
If the study is legit then dont be afraid to share the raw numbers. Transparency is the only way forward.
E
elena Ramirez
13 years ago
Featured
Stop hiding behind excuses. People have a right to know if these crops are safe or not.
T
tom Espinoza
13 years ago
Featured
Total transparency is required here. Too much big money involved to keep secrets.
M
mark Singh
13 years ago
Featured
Science shouldnt be hidden behind closed doors. Show us what you found.
R
Robert Brown
8 years ago
Show it now!
W
Wu Joong
9 years ago
No Gmo Contamination and AgroBussiness !
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
1,000 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via
.
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Instagram
QR Code
Dr. Seralini - Please release data from your biotech corn study
To: Dr. Giles Éric Séralini
From: The undersigned members of the scientific community
Re: Your paper in Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2012
Your recent paper in Food and Chemical Toxicology has elicited unprecedented levels of interest around the world. Yet, invoking lack of space, much of the data were not published.
Accordingly, we the undersigned members of the scientific community, invoke the following clause from Elsevier (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/rights):
Data access and retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
and urge you to make every effort to release all the data. Given the attention and implications of your work, we appeal that you make every effort to make such a release practicable as soon as possible. Only a full disclosure of the data can quell any uncertainties over the results you published.
Updates
Reached 500 supporters
September 27, 2012
Reached 100 supporters
September 24, 2012
September 23, 2012
I am honestly overwhelmed by how many of you have joined this call for transparency. We are just a few signatures away from the hundred mark and your momentum is the only reason we have gotten this far.
8 Comments
S
Sue
12 years ago
Featured
It is completely disgusting and a discredit to serious science that this important study has been unethically retracted. It is vital that the information in this study is widely available to everyone.
S
sarah Riley
13 years ago
Featured
WE DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT IS IN OUR FOOD. RELEASE THE DATA NOW.
D
david Vogel
13 years ago
Featured
If the study is legit then dont be afraid to share the raw numbers. Transparency is the only way forward.
E
elena Ramirez
13 years ago
Featured
Stop hiding behind excuses. People have a right to know if these crops are safe or not.
T
tom Espinoza
13 years ago
Featured
Total transparency is required here. Too much big money involved to keep secrets.
M
mark Singh
13 years ago
Featured
Science shouldnt be hidden behind closed doors. Show us what you found.
R
Robert Brown
8 years ago
Show it now!
W
Wu Joong
9 years ago
No Gmo Contamination and AgroBussiness !
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
1,000 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
It is completely disgusting and a discredit to serious science that this important study has been unethically retracted. It is vital that the information in this study is widely available to everyone.