Dominion Transmission Line

Signatures 33 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Test Dummy on Dec 7, 2012

   Comments: I agree!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Judy Ledbetter on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments: The line will also badly deface a now-pristine section of the Chickahominy River. I you to let your opposition be known.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: John A. Jones Jr on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: JoAnne Crawley on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Marinda Hall on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Hannah Lichty on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Matt Herrman on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Joanne Daniel on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Carrie Daniel on Dec 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Stephen James Binns on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: Charles City County did not have any real input into the Chickahominy Alternative route that was put into place so many years ago, and then forgotten. It is not an appropriate route for our county.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Doris Fulwideer on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: As a resident of Charles City County I ask Dominion not put their transmission line through our county. In addition to all the reasons listed I fear our Historical properties will be affected.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Elizabeth Roark on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments: I support locating the lines where they cross the James River and not the Chickahominy.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Kevin Slattum on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments: The James River is already used and impacted by many industrial / commercial enterprises. Put the power line there. Don't impact the pristine Chickahominy River and it's wetlands. Do the right thing for taxpayer's pocketbook and for our environment and select the shortest route with the least impact - over the James River. Kevin Slattum

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Dr. Patricia Slattum on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments: Use the shortest and most cost effective route for the power line - across the James River and not through Charles City County.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Inge Curtis on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments: Please use the shorter and less expensive route in an already developed area. Inge Curtis

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Inge Curtis on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments: Please use the shorter and less expensive route in an already developed area. Inge Curtis

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Joyce Lampkin on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Dan Roberts on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments: Case # PUE-2012-00029 - do not want the Chickahoiny Alterative route - USE the James River Route

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Sherri Bowman on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Steve Rula, Jr. on Dec 20, 2012

    Comments: I oppose the Chickahominy Alternative Route for this transmission line.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: STEVE FUHRMANN on Dec 21, 2012

    Comments: We, citizens of Charles City, do not want yet another massive commercial power line and corridor crossing our county, destroying our view-sheds, and permanently despoiling forests and wetlands, so that distant population centers can hungrily consume even more power, while we experience frequent local power outages.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Louise Hudgins on Dec 21, 2012

    Comments: We, citizens of Charles City, do not want yet another massive commercial power line and corridor crossing our county, destroying our view-sheds, and permanently despoiling forests and wetlands, so that distant population centers can hungrily consume even more power, while we experience frequent local power outages.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: John F. Miniclier on Dec 24, 2012

    Comments: The SCC should select the least costly alternative with the shortest route. Jame River crossing meets both of those requirements.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Sylvia Williams on Dec 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Thomas Fenton on Dec 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: David Ledbetter on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: Uise of the apparently incomplete right-of-way Dominion acquired without notice to Charles City County in the early 1970's would be disasterous for historic, scenic and environmental resources in the County, would harm residents' economic interests and could threaten the health of many who live in close proximity. The proposed Surry route would be far less damaging to the environment, historic resources and quality of life and other interests of citizens. It also would be substantially less costly and is acceptable to PJM, which will share in its costs of construction.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Charles Harwood Jr. on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Donna Harwood on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: MD Grogan on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments: The Chickahominy River is too rich in history to disrupt anymore priceless and hopefully everlasting sites.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Carole Moye on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Dennis M Frisbee on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1