Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 403 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 9 »

  1. 1
    Name: Kerrie Ferguson on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments: A 1000% increase is extortionate.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Alison Hetherington on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Sarah on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments: this is crazy! 3/4 of dog owners dont have a license now when its only £5 why on earth would they then pay £50!!
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments: this would mean pensioners and people with low incomes will not be able to afford a pet dog, thus denying them of the pleasure a little dog would bring into the family home. There are people living on their own and a dog is their only companionship. What will be next The air we breathe!
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Denise McCaul on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Sandra Sloan on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments: Absolutely ridiculous. Again only targeting honest people snd the rogues as usual get off scott free!!!!!!!
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Jonathan on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments: It Better Not happen They Get enough From us as it is.
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Steven on Oct 8, 2009
    Comments: say no to put up dog linces
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Lynne Hull on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: any normal dog lover like me already has their dogs licenced and micro chipped why should i pay £50 per dg when the problem is those that dont pay for the licence in the first place do the gov really think that they will pay now
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: I THINK THIS IS TERRIBLE. I HAVE 5 WELL LOVED AND CARED FOR DOGS AND IF GOES UP TO £50 THERE NO WAY I COULD AFFORD TO KEEP THEM ALL.
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Peter Boulter on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Jim McMaster on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: Another stealth tax on the working people
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Ray Harris on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: I think it is disgusting that a minority can dictate to the majority.It is a definite no to this ridiculous proposal.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: it will increase stray dogs when people like pensioners cant afford the new fee, 2 of my friends who already have neutered dogs have said that they couldnt afford it so will have to rehome dogs if it comes into force, this is just another tax on decent folk who already pay their dues, ie, current licence, road tax, car ins etc etc, and the price of microchipping (something my dog already has from a pup) will also shoot up in price when if it becomes compulsary along with licence increase, another money making scheme. people just wont pay and it wont change a thing apart from make those dogs already known to the councils by having a current licence, HOMELESS
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Cathy on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Jenna Nelson on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: They say this increase is to reduce number of stray dogs....well I am afraid if they increase the price in this they will increase stray dogs people simply can not afford a 1000% INCREASE.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: this is a disgrace to have it go up by that much
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: Ridiculous!
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Joe on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Karen Toney on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: This is ridiculous to put the price up to £50 i cant afford that which means my dog cant be licenced which means i face having him taken of me i think it is a disgrace to put hte price up that much free spaying or neutering is the answer not this Im totally against it and if it does go up i will not be getting my dog a licence
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: EMMA MCCARDLE on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Lesley Dodds on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: Why penalise responsible dog owners who pay their license and control their dogs by increasing the fee unnecessarily AND looking to further restrict where we can safely allow our dogs to run and play. If the government want to outlaw potentially dangerous dogs they should target the people who cause them to be dangerous and NOT responsible owners.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: madness this is what you get for being a lawfull and paying your fees
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Mrs Malcolm on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: it is rediculous how are elderly people supposed to afford this fee for some a dog is the only company they have
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: This is a ridiculous increase, especially for someone like myself with more than one dog. With pet insurance and vet bills this is just extortion by the Government. What justification do they have to implement such an increase OUTRAGEOUS!
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: This is a ridiculous increase, especially for someone like myself with more than one dog. With pet insurances, micro chipping and vet bills this is just another extortion by the Government to penalise honest hardworking law abiding people. What justification do they have to implement such an increase Take a pay cut like the rest of us you greedy fat-cats and see how well you manage!! OUTRAGEOUS!
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: I agree that this rise is ridiculous
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Gabriel Baradat on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: £50 a license....£44 for injections ...£ wotever the price for microchipping i understand all are essential but people are being forced to give up pets because of these prices NOT GOOD ENOUGH !!!
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: This is a ridiculous charge and will only affect those owner who are resopnsible. How can any Government increase charges by 1000%.
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: This is a ridiculous charge and will only affect those owner who are resopnsible. How can any Government increase charges by 1000%.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: What a joke from a pack of idiot councillors
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Danny Faye on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: just another tax to keep them comfy in the big house on the hill
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Nichola on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Steven on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Cara on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: Too much too soon! While i appreciate that admin costs do rise, this increase is too drastic. I forsee more unlicenced dogs. Cumpulsory microchipping of all pets, and an optional online annual re- registration may be more sensible.
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Stacie on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: dog licence go up then more dogs would end up put down due to not having money to licence these pets NO RISE IN LICENCE
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Janette Mckee on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: this is madness,is there not enough dogs needing new homes, this is going to stop a lot of people being able to take a dog and give it a good home!!!
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Norah Ferguson on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: Once again responsible dog owners are being penalised.
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Peter Hamilton on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments: madness
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Sheelagh Foy on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Andrew Mulholland on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Andrew Mulholland on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Sharon Walker on Oct 9, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 9 »

Sponsored links