Microsoft, Please Give Us Back Decent HTML in Outlook 2007!

Signatures 638 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 13 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 16, 2007

   Comments: Give me a break Microsoft, use IE's rendering engine, not Word's. It's 2007, not 1997.

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2007

   Comments: unconscionable adjective 1. Lacking scruples or principles: conscienceless, ruthless, unethical, unprincipled, unscrupulous. See honest/dishonest. 2. Beyond all reason: obscene, outrageous, preposterous, ridiculous, shocking, unreasonable. Idioms: out of bounds, out of sight. See usual/unusual. 3. Vastly exceeding a normal limit, as in cost: sky-high, steep1, stiff, stratospheric. See big/small/amount, usual/unusual.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Chris Clark on Feb 19, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 19, 2007

   Comments: The decision to not use IE/HTML Outlook 2007 set the design industry back 5 years. This is not what I expect from Microsoft.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Marcel Galema on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Chris Hamann on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments: Maybe we can change Microsofts mind. Everybody has a right to correct his errors. Let's give Microsoft that opportunity too.

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Andreas Kurzen on Feb 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Adriaan Steyn on Feb 21, 2007

    Comments: PLEASE!!!!!!

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Eric Spaargaren on Feb 21, 2007

    Comments: Microsoft, Please Give Us Back Decent HTML in Outlook 2007

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Mark on Feb 22, 2007

    Comments: Why turn back the clock 10 years I wan't to be able to code decent HTML newsletters!

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Pete Moss on Feb 22, 2007

    Comments: Forward Into the PAST!!! Come on Microsoft. FIX this.

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Philip Vermoens on Feb 23, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 23, 2007

    Comments: its a disaster for emailmarketing, please "think" forward ! for micorsoft: think more about: how can we secure things with the funcitonality we now have. Its the duty for microsoft to stop the spammers and virus criminals. Not to stop the whole marketing and design community! its a shame ! Please mister Gates listen more to the people and design community.

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 23, 2007

    Comments: Microsoft, you've gone too far. You have used up all my patience and time, stop this non sense!

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: C De Haas on Feb 24, 2007

    Comments: Give me a break Microsoft, use IE's rendering engine, not Word's. It's 2007, not 1997.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Jordan Van Bergen on Feb 25, 2007

    Comments: This is a wrong STEP Microsoft. FIX THIS ASAP or otherwise bring out a new outlook 2008 version that will render like IE again!

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Mike Chervenka on Feb 26, 2007

    Comments: Way to go guys. Smooth, real smooth.

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2007

    Comments: I would like to see the old outlook back to outlook 2007. It is so much pain to click on the link and then open internet explorer. It is pain in the neck to do "click" then "click" then "click" I rather to click once for all. You have no RIGHTS TO remove HTML from Outlook 2007. And also whats more is that no support for no infobar banner in my outlook 2007. I want my infobar banner back just the way outlook 2003 was. You have no RIGHT to remove everything from outlook 2003 to Outlook 2007.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Iain Dooley on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments: i don't bother supporting microsoft products. i don't test in ie at all.

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Ryan on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments: More attention to the support of CSS where exploits are not possible should be paid. Not all of the unsupported features are security risks.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Russell Harrower on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments: Please at least provide the rendering capability of 2003

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Brian Kelly on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Alex Barber on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Thijs Leydens on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Tom Sunshine on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments: Thanks, Microsoft. We spend about as much on MS Office 2007 as we do on the computers it runs on. Outlook 2007 runs dog slow, and now our users are complaining about crappy-looking messages. And that's just Outlook. OpenOffice and Thunderbird are looking more attractive all the time....

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments: If you can't be bothered to write your own rendering engine, adopt Gecko instead.

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Lensco on Mar 5, 2007

    Comments: give me back my margin and padding!

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2007

    Comments: microsoft is absolutely crazy to mess up outlook like that!

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Marc Fathauer on Mar 5, 2007

    Comments: Why not just go with IE7 engine

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Katherine Calmejane on Mar 6, 2007

    Comments: What the... Why choose not to comply and annoy people rather than to comply and make everyone's time easier

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Marko on Mar 6, 2007

    Comments: Most newsletter are broken, were is PIXEL as unit, why resize images when inserted in mail, this is totaly retarded, this caused lots of costs and damage!

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: J. Strauss on Mar 7, 2007

    Comments: You can't just turn back the clock.

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Xiaoxin on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Jamie McDaniel on Mar 9, 2007

    Comments: I have Office 2003 and was going to upgrade because of Outlook (I use it sooooo much more than Word, Excel, or Powerpoint.) No way I'll upgrade now, however. Maybe Microsoft will fix these issues with HTML emails breaking in Outlook 2007.

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: J M Rivera on Mar 9, 2007

    Comments: I am very disappointed with this decision to use the Word engine for html emails in Outlook. I am not a Microsoft basher, have even stood up for them to those that are, but i cannot defend them on this one. I am going to have start looking at the alternatives (Apple comes to mind). Shame on you, Microsoft.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Christian Liebig on Mar 10, 2007

    Comments: i just can say: ...

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Thomas Locke on Mar 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: James Dugger on Mar 11, 2007

    Comments: FIX IT !!!!!!! and fix it FAST!!!!

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Sebastian on Mar 11, 2007

    Comments: please...

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Roanne LeRoy-Dyson on Mar 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Paul Christie on Mar 13, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Thaisie on Mar 13, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 13 › »