Microsoft, Please Give Us Back Decent HTML in Outlook 2007!

Signatures 638 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 13 › »

1. 101
   Name: Michael Crow on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments: I love the look and feel of Outlook 2007 but the performance is lackluster and the removal/failure of Microsoft to develop a proper HTML engine that end users can choose to use themselves should the need or desire arises is unacceptable. My funny animations dont work anymore either.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Anja Popp ! on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments: u fools. damn the lot of u haha

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Carol Dawson on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Steffi Rausch on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments: Please allow HTML backgrounds to work and for CSS float, border, and padding to work! And improve the ability for tables to render colspans & rowspans. This is what most email newsletters use and need for all our thousands of client's newsletters to work. You have hit us hard and with what I assume will be angry clients when we say that we can't support Outlook 2007 until you update.

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Chris Hogben on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Nelpin on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Robert Wilkins on Feb 1, 2007

   Comments: I've been using microsoft products for years and I've always been impressed with the forward progression of your software. I can't belive that Outlook 2007 offers such a limited and stifling rendering of html. Obviously, RSS and future technologies will someday replace html-based emails, but it's still a large chunk of how enewsletters and developed. I'm hoping that your programmers will re-think O-2007 and come up with a better, more advanced update.

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Marria on Feb 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2007

    Comments: People need jobs and youre just handing it over to machines, i know that tech is advanced but a computer is only as good as the person using it

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2007

    Comments: You're hurting the industry with this. Please make an effort to change...

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Frans Van Bellen on Feb 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Pete Harvey on Feb 2, 2007

    Comments: millions of my customers will be adversely affected by this decision. how about you give us a proper solution (html editing and rendering) rather than forcing our hand I will ensure my company and peers completeley avoid outlook 2007 until this is resolved. Shame as I had heard it was shaping up to be a great product.

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: PK on Feb 2, 2007

    Comments: dont do it!

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Erwin Heiser on Feb 2, 2007

    Comments: This should be obvious why isn't it

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2007

    Comments: Outlook 2007 does not support animated gifs! Thats a pitty!

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Jeremy Brown on Feb 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Rowan on Feb 3, 2007

    Comments: So now I also have to buy Office 07 to test HTML emails, apparently IE7 isn't good enough. What happened to HTML being a STANDARD

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Leigh Green on Feb 3, 2007

    Comments: I'm with you my friend

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Joanne Hazeldine` on Feb 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2007

    Comments: you cant just take away html as this has consqunces, such as mutipul jpob losses

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Chris Taylor on Feb 4, 2007

    Comments: Please don't break HTML email...

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Mark Haveman on Feb 5, 2007

    Comments: Don't take our email newsletter design freedom from us. Please make 5 steps forwards and not backwards !!!!

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: F.Vos on Feb 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Michael Walker on Feb 5, 2007

    Comments: this is a disgrace! bill gates you should be ashamed!!!

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2007

    Comments: This is the worst ever seen!!!! Please use IE html rendering for Outlook 2007.

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Marcel on Feb 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Aaron Smith on Feb 6, 2007

    Comments: All I can say is: argh!

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Jim Kelley on Feb 6, 2007

    Comments: I design email. The inability to display background images challenges those templates that are designed to expand and collapse with change in content, and keep it's visual prominence. The inablity to display alt tags is a knock for those with disabilities. There are laws in the UK for this.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Dan McCarthy on Feb 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Kevin on Feb 6, 2007

    Comments: totally awful. bring back the ie engine!

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Ian Deshays on Feb 7, 2007

    Comments: Why would you do that!

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Jess Hetland on Feb 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Jodie Lloyd-Baker on Feb 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Chris Anderson on Feb 7, 2007

    Comments: Maybe someday they'll give us a 1/2 way decent product from the start.

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2007

    Comments: i bought office professional 2007, i used to use Outlook for my email. I have since switched to Incredimail Premium so I can get the features I used to have in Outlook.

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2007

    Comments: plz change this annoying word engine!

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Robert Navarro on Feb 8, 2007

    Comments: Our monthly newsletters will have to be revised now.....please fix this!

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Steve McMillan on Feb 9, 2007

    Comments: Whilst I am not part of the marketing industry, since upgrading to outlook 2007 my custom made html signature no longer works correctly. (most notably the marquee command) Not happy. For a moment there, I thought I was purchasing an upgrade not a downgrade..... Guess I'll try for a refund and go back to 2003.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 9, 2007

    Comments: We miss our HTML email!!!!

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 9, 2007

    Comments: We use signatures to display our business cards (recreated in HTML). We relied on CSS and full HTML support in Outlook 2003 and previous versions for that.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Ben Van Der Laan on Feb 11, 2007

    Comments: need we say more

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2007

    Comments: Please give me back my background image attribute :(

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Phil Williams on Feb 13, 2007

    Comments: Here at Christian Aid (a UK overseas development charity), we have over 100,000 people who have ASKED to receive information about our online campaigning against the causes of poverty. This will affect our ability to communicate effectively with our suppoorters and make the money we just spent on designing our new html email templates a waste of money. Please go back to how it was.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 14, 2007

    Comments: This is yet one more example of how Office 2007 fails when it comes to accessibility. Without ALT tags, along with other standard HTML design elements, users with vision problems who rely on ALT tags are completely ignored.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Carles Del Collado on Feb 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Trey Cranson on Feb 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 15, 2007

    Comments: Thanks a lot microsoft! Your so-called "upgrade" has screwed up HTML based emails all over the world. Great move.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 13 › »