Signatures 1665 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ... 34 › »
-
301
Name: Daniel Delrue on Oct 15, 2010Comments: nikon please give a 1080p 25fps mode!!!Flag
-
302
Name: Chris Breshears on Oct 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
303
Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
304
Name: Courtenay Ennis on Oct 15, 2010Comments: Strongly agree with all of these points. I'd add: further improvements to autofocus in live view, and stronger audio adjustment: why not make the audio input more like the 5dmkII--it's a killer feature that seems like it would be way easier to implement than others that may be limited by sensor heat or processor speed. For video, right now, can't imagine why I won't be getting a GH2 or Canon. Nikon should be trying to leapfrog the competition, after such a long behind-the-curve period in the video arena, but their recent "big move" didn't even get them close caught up, spec-wise, to Canon and Panasonic. It's somewhat fair to say we also need to wait to see some comparisons, but without 25/30/50/60fps and high bitrate, they'll lose a lot of sales to people who read specs, regardless. Nikon's sensor quality for stills is still the best. I have a lot invested in Nikon and would love for them to beat the competition in video, too.Flag
-
305
Name: Eric Benacek on Oct 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
306
Name: Jason Bateham on Oct 15, 2010Comments: You'd have to pry my D3 out of my cold dead hands........HOWEVER, I did buy a 5D Mark II last year because of aspirations to create artistic and stunning DSLR films. I hope that Nikon is listening when we say that we are yearning for the ability to create visually stunning motion pictures with Nikon's system (cameras, lenses, etc.). Thanks for your hard and continued work, Nikon! JasonFlag
-
307
Name: Benjamin Boarder on Oct 15, 2010Comments: Yeah dude - I also want these 1080p/25,30fps and 720p/50/60fps I really can't realise that nikon developed a nikon cam with 24fps - with it i can't do anything serious. and also that nikon uses b-frames - that's very crappy when you try to edit it in AE or different programs. SO PLEASE my dear NIKON change the settings of your very hot D7000 - I beg you PLEASE !!!Flag
-
308
Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
309
Name: Anonymous on Oct 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
310
Name: Elia Giger on Oct 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
311
Name: Kevin Djaja on Oct 16, 2010Comments: let's increase higher video shooting rate !Flag
-
312
Name: Khalil Ismail on Oct 16, 2010Comments: I do not know why adn what are the waiting for. Honstly I just sold some of gear and I am going to wait till the end of this year otherwise bye bye nikon after 25 years of loyality. the do not seem to share our loyalityFlag
-
313
Name: Anonymous on Oct 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
314
Name: Martin Koleják on Oct 16, 2010Comments: I WANT 1080 25/30p (especially 25, im from europe) its very dificult to convert 23,976 (24p) to 25 correctly!!!!!!! i also want 720p / 50/60p to slow motion, PLEEEAAASEEEE NIIIIKKKOOOOOONNNNNNFlag
-
315
Name: Ali Santana on Oct 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
316
Name: Tas Khan on Oct 16, 2010Comments: It beats me that Nikon are taking so long to come up with a decent and friendly full raster HD Video DSLR. I cannot believe they don't have the technology and that they cannot do it when the rest of the world is doing it, e.g. Canon, Panasonic. Nikon don't have to worry about the placing their video section against their still photography products as is the case with Canon and Panasonic. When Panasonic brings out 4/3 GH2, they weigh it and balance it very carefully against 4/3 AG-AF100. In fact Nikon can benefit enormously by putting the video capability of Red Scarlet (not necessarily 3K) in a camera like D700. I don't think it is too late even in a market which has already been won by 5DMII. Nikon will be surprised.Flag
-
317
Name: Anonymous on Oct 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
318
Name: Anonymous on Oct 17, 2010Comments: 1080 24, 25, 30 720 60/50 Higher bit rate shooting optionFlag
-
319
Name: Ivo Hristov on Oct 17, 2010Comments: Go Nikon!Flag
-
320
Name: Vegard Ek on Oct 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
321
Name: Juan Pablo Bello on Oct 18, 2010Comments:Flag
-
322
Name: Alex Ivory on Oct 18, 2010Comments:Flag
-
323
Name: Adam Welz on Oct 18, 2010Comments: We need these features in this body, as small and light as it is, not in a heavier body -- the D7000 would be the perfect camera for combination stills & videojournalism (where lighter weight, toughness and affordability etc. are at a premium) for those of us with Nikon lenses if it just had higher bitrate video available at more framerates. For now, anyone who wants to do video on a decent budget should go Canon -- they are really listening to their video customers. I'm on the edge of switching a 20 year loyalty to Nikon over to Canon because of the failure of doing this simple thing in this body.Flag
-
324
Name: Juan Pablo Bello on Oct 18, 2010Comments:Flag
-
325
Name: Anonymous on Oct 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
326
Name: Aaron on Oct 19, 2010Comments: This is a must Nikon.Flag
-
327
Name: Anonymous on Oct 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
328
Name: Mark D Johnson on Oct 19, 2010Comments: Please issue firmware upgrades!!!Flag
-
329
Name: Chirag Rana on Oct 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
330
Name: Paul on Oct 19, 2010Comments: 720-60p is so crucial these days, let's see an update please!Flag
-
331
Name: Vadym Loza on Oct 19, 2010Comments: Looking for: 1080 24, 25, 30 720 60/50 (for PAL) for D7000 and D700sFlag
-
332
Name: G. Mancusa on Oct 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
333
Name: Ben Shine on Oct 19, 2010Comments: Put Nikon in front!Flag
-
334
Name: Anonymous on Oct 20, 2010Comments: 25 fps 25 fps 25 fpsFlag
-
335
Name: Francesco Marino on Oct 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
336
Name: Martin Bernstein on Oct 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
337
Name: Arturo Barbuto on Oct 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
338
Name: Patryk Lejman on Oct 20, 2010Comments: I have been a Nikon user for last 15 years and would hate to change to Canon just because of better video options.Flag
-
339
Name: Anonymous on Oct 20, 2010Comments: Let's catch up to Canon, Nikon! You can do it! ;-)Flag
-
340
Name: Anonymous on Oct 20, 2010Comments: I'm solely interested in a D7000 with PAL frame rates. I want to have "1080 50i". All the broadcast, professional and prosumer Videocams have no problems with this european tv oriented rates. Only Nikon seems to live on the moon.Flag
-
341
Name: Dao Son on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
342
Name: Greg Ruzik on Oct 21, 2010Comments: nikon must be gr8Flag
-
343
Name: . on Oct 21, 2010Comments: 1080 24, 25, 30 720 60/50 (for PAL) and a Higher bit rate shooting option!Flag
-
344
Name: Anonymous on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
345
Name: Anonymous on Oct 21, 2010Comments: I am owner of two D3S and lot of Nikon lens and accessories. I am expecting Nikon to deliver a new DSLR with video capabilities equal or better then the actual Canon video DSLR. I was expecting the D700 to be this camera, but it's not the situation. Soon, i will become a Canon user....because i got only one life, and i can not wait for ever after Nikon to deliver what customer want. And i am a customer ! PierreFlag
-
346
Name: Larold Rebhun on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
347
Name: Simon Germain on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
348
Name: J McMahon on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
349
Name: Oleg Borschuk on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
350
Name: Jan Ovelgönne on Oct 21, 2010Comments:Flag