Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 65 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: William Gittings on Jul 28, 2002
    State: CT
    Country: US
    Comments: Vote NO!
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Nora Gilbertson on Aug 7, 2002
    State: MN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: John R Kellogg Jr on Aug 16, 2002
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: David Schmidt on Aug 30, 2002
    State: IN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Bryan Merandi on Sep 1, 2002
    State: NY
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Paul Hoskins on Sep 2, 2002
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments: I've read the bill and contrary to Mr. Berman's statement...there will next to no restrictions on what the music industry can do! This surpasses even the FBI and other government agency's ability! No way they should have rights that no one else is allowed!
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: William Turner on Sep 4, 2002
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: this bill is an outrage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Grif Schaffer on Sep 6, 2002
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments: Privacy is a key issue in this situation and user rights. The supreme court, in the 80's decided that it was NOT illegal to make copies of tapes. In short, they decided that dual tape decks were legal, and duplication was ok. Cd burners are no different, and based on the precedent set in the 80's file swapping and duplication of CD's will never and should never become a crime.
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: James Cartwright on Sep 7, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Shayne Edmunds on Sep 8, 2002
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Robert Wolfe on Sep 8, 2002
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: RaShanti Prowett on Sep 9, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Angelo Vinceslao on Sep 9, 2002
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments: This is definatley violating my civil rights.
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Matthew Szymczyk on Sep 10, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Adam Banks on Sep 11, 2002
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Matthew Williams on Sep 15, 2002
    State: NM
    Country: US
    Comments: Why doesn't the record industry come over and take my whole hard drive God this place is becoming communist!
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Luis Terrazas on Sep 15, 2002
    State: NM
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Kate Spencer on Sep 18, 2002
    State: MO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Stephen Hoenig on Sep 22, 2002
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Kyle Mick on Sep 23, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Victoria Robison on Sep 28, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I am not comfortable with the fact that someone else could hack into my computer and freely destroy files without my consent. I feel that it is a violation of my civil rights. Come up with a better plan to combat illegal downloading. This only seperates the fans from the musicians even more, along with giving the fans less freedom. Is that what the music is about
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Ritujoy Chowdhury on Sep 29, 2002
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Ken Hollinger on Sep 30, 2002
    State: IA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Susan Gutierrez on Oct 5, 2002
    State: OK
    Country: US
    Comments: Please put my name on the petition to stop this invasion of privacy and potential legalized hacking!!!
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Shoneika McCastle on Oct 6, 2002
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments: This is not the way to go about it!
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Allison Byrum on Oct 7, 2002
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Chris Bellew on Oct 8, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Jason Aldridge on Oct 13, 2002
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Jamelle Legaspi on Oct 14, 2002
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: James Barton on Oct 16, 2002
    State: AL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Peter O'Connor-Divelbiss on Oct 20, 2002
    State: MI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Katy-Jo Orth on Oct 28, 2002
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments: P2P is a mass collaboration— a collaboration that is ever ready and everywhere— The fundamental facility of P2P technology is to add resources to an ever growing, never ending, and vast network of information. This vast network of information includes everything from research material to independent films—Information not readily available to a grand majority of the American peoples. To implement a governing legislation in favor of corporate conglomerates over the heads of the cash-in-hand consumers would be detrimental to the very corporate powerhouses the P2P Piracy Prevention Act would be trying to protect. Giving corporations the means to gain voyeuristic control over personal consumer property, the ability to with hold information, files, public domains, the power to detect, manipulate personal consumer property would cause to a great extent a conflict of interest and would raise countless questions of consumer security and rights to privacy. Interdiction, spoofing, redirection of P2P applications to a public or private domain, PC, server or network is hacking. The very definition of a hacker is breaking into computer systems whether it be a PC, a server, a network, or a website—and this is what the P2P Piracy Prevention Act would allow Corporations to do with in “strict bounds”. With the strides in protecting consumers and corporations alike from hacking—would this legislation defeat the purpose of any and all previous ground breaking laws of protection against cyber-terrorism It would open a flood gate to “Legale hacking” and would compromise the privacy of not just the consumer, but to any one who stores any information on a PC, a server, a network, or a website. If the P2P Piracy Prevention act goes into action—it will provoke a full-scale cyber-war, and no one—not even the corporations would be safe. In essence, the P2P Piracy Prevention act is not solely based respectively on copyright issues, but in fact an issue of revenue.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Cathryn Daisy on Dec 12, 2002
    State: MI
    Country: US
    Comments: are you kidding me I guess Orwell wasn't too far off with the whole 'Big Brother is watching you' thing. My god.
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Angela Allen on Feb 8, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: How horrible. Our country's becoming just like that Oceania country in the book 1984, I swear...
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Louis Taub on Feb 20, 2003
    State:
    Country: UK
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Steven Hubbard on Mar 17, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Josef Hnulik on Apr 3, 2003
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Comments: No one should be allowed to obuse public for they're personal profit. If the government and law was up to date with technology no one would worry.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Jennifer Gray on Jun 25, 2003
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Robert Miller on Aug 12, 2003
    State: NY
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Nathan HOLLOWAY on Oct 10, 2003
    State: OK
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Nick Newsted on Oct 27, 2003
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments: The government should not be able to regulate the files or tranfer of files on our computer, just like they cant regulate what foods we keep in our refigerator.
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Sheri Lanik on Jan 15, 2004
    State: WI
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Sheri Lanik on Jan 15, 2004
    State: WI
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Barry Weissman on Mar 28, 2004
    State: MD
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Brian Walls on Aug 10, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: A F on Dec 7, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Lisha Valenti on Dec 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: John O'Connor on Aug 7, 2005
    State:
    Country: CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Matt Eck on Jan 20, 2006
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Lillian Deckert on Oct 16, 2006
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sign Petition Now!

Sponsored links