Signatures 822 total
-
1
Name: Filipe Oliveira on Oct 17, 2011Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Mark McKenzie on Oct 18, 2011Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Kayla McGeorge on Oct 19, 2011Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Ashley Fellmeth on Oct 19, 2011Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Bruce Fader on Oct 19, 2011Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Marie-Josee Vinet on Oct 20, 2011Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Lea O'Shaughnessy on Oct 20, 2011Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Oct 20, 2011Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Genrys Goodchild on Oct 20, 2011Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Oct 20, 2011Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Julie Fader on Oct 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Jane Juranek on Oct 22, 2011Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: BUCHEL on Nov 3, 2011Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Kraiger on Nov 3, 2011Comments:Flag
-
15
Name:
Sebastien Ferland on Nov 4, 2011
Comments:Flag -
16
Name: Kelsey Reed on Nov 4, 2011Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Benoit Thibodeau on Nov 5, 2011Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Dumas on Nov 5, 2011Comments: laisser nous notre libertéFlag
-
19
Name: Andre Ferrigno on Nov 11, 2011Comments: I support the petition against the Bill C-11 We are concerned with the upcoming implementation of Bill C-11, The Copyright Modernization Act, by the Conservative Government. Although Bill C-11 seems to be closer to its goal to providing a fair balance of consumer and creator rights than the previous attempts at copyright policy improvements, the strict anti-circumvention provisions outlined in this Bill suggest otherwise. As Canadians, we are concerned that our constitutional rights are being disregarded in that this bill essentially hands over power to corporations to decide and dictate our online behaviour. The anti-circumvention provisions in Bill C-11 will give corporate copyright owners an authority that can be used to control Canadians’ personal interaction with media-including technology we own. With the power in the hands of corporations to place digital locks on their material, there is a risk that the flow of information and resources is put into the hands of companies with only their own corporate interests in mind, neglecting consumer rights. There needs to be regulation on how digital locks are implemented to ensure they are not simply used to deny user rights. We suggest there be more transparency in laws, so that when a Canadian enters a website, they are immediately presented with the way in which they are allowed to use the information, so there is no confusion and unfair penalty. This would permit Canadian consumers to make informed decisions about the products they purchase so they can know what rights they can expect to have.Flag
-
20
Name: Puyraimond-Zemmour Jeremy on Nov 19, 2011Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Poulain on Nov 20, 2011Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Katelynn on Nov 22, 2011Comments:Flag
-
23
Name:
Ian Rogers on Dec 7, 2011
Comments: Seriously feds, seriously?Flag -
24
Name: Allie on Dec 10, 2011Comments: That's not just logic. That's rlealy sensible.Flag
-
25
Name: Gsteco on Dec 10, 2011Comments: eWDcgf wsmgpmuvnsutFlag
-
26
Name: Valinda on Dec 11, 2011Comments: Haha, shouldn't you be cahrgnig for that kind of knowledge?!Flag
-
27
Name: Mqqlhrsffdc on Dec 11, 2011Comments: EUd7P0 , kehdsgzaoqvr, ezjwtaujwccx, http://cgxjztbwesqq.com/Flag
-
28
Name: Lumngohr on Dec 11, 2011Comments: erFtsZ ejcetimhvguoFlag
-
29
Name: Leatrice on Dec 12, 2011Comments: We've arrevid at the end of the line and I have what I need!Flag
-
30
Name: Michael McIntee on Dec 13, 2011Comments: My wife and I are against Bill C-11.Flag
-
31
Name: Nwlxcpun on Dec 13, 2011Comments: fNUV6d , oqcxednttbls, xwdxriskhdor, http://iwbelleycquh.com/Flag
-
32
Name: Anonymous on Jan 18, 2012Comments:Flag
-
33
Name:
James Marchment on Jan 18, 2012
Comments:Flag -
34
Name: Luke on Jan 19, 2012Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Sydney on Jan 19, 2012Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Anonymous on Jan 19, 2012Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Jan 19, 2012Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Jan 19, 2012Comments: you won't win thisFlag
-
39
Name: Cole Birney-Stewart on Jan 20, 2012Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Tony Clarke Hawco on Jan 20, 2012Comments: Fuck all these damn bills. C-11 SOPA and Pipa can burn in hell!Flag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Jan 20, 2012Comments: Heard about this bill from a Canadian Youtuber. It isn't good.Flag
-
42
Name: Blake Gyuk on Jan 20, 2012Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Andrew Willey on Jan 20, 2012Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Rye Guiboche on Jan 20, 2012Comments: This bill does more harm than good to innovating the technology industry, to truly stop piracy we must find a way to balance freedom of the people, but protecting the media that is bring pirated. This is not the solution and will only cause problemsFlag
-
45
Name: Ed Shalayda on Jan 20, 2012Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Charlie on Jan 20, 2012Comments: This is a bill very much like SOPA and PIPA in the United States, and considering the worldwide backlash those two bills are getting, I strongly suggest the Canadian government doesn't make the same mistake as our neighbouring country has.Flag
-
47
Name: Anonymous on Jan 20, 2012Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Jennifer on Jan 20, 2012Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Alicia Cotter on Jan 20, 2012Comments: Bill C-11 seems like unnessesary litigation that will do nothing more than add more cases to our already overburdened courts.Flag
-
50
Name:
Mike Vatcher on Jan 20, 2012
Comments: Make others aware of thisFlag