Signatures 119 total
-
101
Name: Sharon McGregor on Jan 4, 2008Comments:Flag
-
102
Name: Gregor I. McGregor on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: Gregor I. McGregor on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: Suzanne Mirak on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Robert Mirak on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Anonymous on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: Kevin Stone on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Kerry Anne Stone on Jan 6, 2008Comments:Flag
-
109
Name: Anonymous on Jan 7, 2008Comments:Flag
-
110
Name: Anonymous on Jan 7, 2008Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Mark Celi on Jan 7, 2008Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Bob Lehmann on Jan 7, 2008Comments:Flag
-
113
Name: Ellen Comeau on Jan 7, 2008Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Sarah C. Gates on Jan 9, 2008Comments: The Acton model seems to work well according to my friends there. I don't see why Concord would force 100% full day on all families when there is such a workable model where everyone who wants 1/2 day gets it.Flag
-
115
Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2008Comments: I am amazed at the response favoring the half-day option. Parents that want half-day for their children should have that choice. However, I believe there are plenty of families, like ours, that could benefit from and would take advantage of ADK; perhaps they are not as vocal or aware of the issue I hope this discussion does not dissuade the SC from ADK. Also, please do not have separate classes for half and full day - this will only segregate "working family kids" from the others.Flag
-
116
Name: Frank Feist on Jan 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
117
Name: Sxwrgdjkbw on Feb 5, 2010Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Gtacrtphy on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Adpgunsspwq on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag