Canadian Museum of Contemporary Photography Musée canadien de la photographie contemporaine

Signatures 5306 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 107 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Chris Chapman on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments: as a working professional photographer living and working internationally as well as being born and raised in Ottawa, i am both deeply saddened and angered by this ridiculous move....we need more cultural institutions ....not more chambers for politicians....having a museum of CONTEMPORARY photography was something i was proud and very aware of

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Gisele Gordon on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Steve Chapman on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Melissa Radomsky on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Diana Leveille on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Phoebe Brown on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments: Less parliament more art!

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Hugh Eastwood on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Kate Seymour on Apr 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Philippe Debeerst on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Stephen Seinader on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Eyvindur P. Eiriksson on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Edwin Janzen on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Gitanjali Pyndiah on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Mary Ann Swerdfeger on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Anu Bose on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Catherine Tedford on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: William Cowan on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: and get on with the portrair gallery.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Louise Abbott on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: As a photographer and a photo historian, I am well aware of the importance of the CMCP. I urge the federal government to reconsider its stance and enable this vibrant museum to retain its status as an autonomous institution.

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Patricia Ashley on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: I feel that this is a much needed facility. Few venues are available for photography as it is.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Fred Lum on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: John Scott on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Gillian Salmond on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: I visited the museum often and was very impressed by the collection. It deserves its own space and the location is impressive. To use that wonderful space for offices is unacceptable

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Petra Halkes on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Adrian Göllner on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: Keep our cultural institutions.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Elisabeth Feryn on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Justin Wonnacott on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Christine Conley on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Jennifer Zeitz on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Jennifer Zeitz on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Jennifer Zeitz on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Lorren Leveille on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: please understand the importance and historical relevance of the CMCP

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Carole Girouard on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: Ce musée est une richesse culturelle pour le pays.

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Rhonda Nolan on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Carol Breton on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Kristine Hanna on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Catherine Richards on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Mark Anderson on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Theresa Marquardt on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Victor Tavares on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Martin Berthelot on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: The fact that the NAC is even considering closing down the CMCP is delporable. In a city with already very limited gallery space it is inconceivable to consider reducing it further.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Chris Jones on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Leo Lazar on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: I see photography as an art form that captures essential elements of human experience as well as the impact on the artist. This is true whether the objects are people, animals or landscapes. I mourn the loss of a photo or the album where it was displayed for nothing can ever replace it.

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Philippe Croteau on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: GEORGE HUNTER on Apr 23, 2009

    Comments: The C.M.C.P. has been doing an excellent job of securing, preserving and exbhiting the lifetime work of Canadian photographers. They must be allowed to continue this important mission as the photographers are the true historians of the day. In my seven decades of photograph, I have felt that the oher side of fine art considers photography a a second-class entity. The current action of the National Gallery proves my contention without a shadow of doubt. Mr. Red Wilson, chaiman of Historica, prpclaims, “A country without appreciation of its heritage is not a country.” To assist photographers in helping Canada remaining a country, I believe C.M.C.P. should be divorced from the National Gallery and returned to its former venue on the Rideau Canal.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 107 › »