| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 101 | Trefor Hughes | This Parish needs public open space, we have never had our fair share, it seems that if its green builders will build on it, thats OK to them, however do they live here NO. Up in the Cotswold telling us it's Ok is not the answer- For once leave it alone, we need open space. |
| 102 | Mrs Caroline.J. Meek | This land was saved for a school, but now this is not required and it should be left as an open space as intended by the Quedgeley Parish Council |
| 103 | Keith Miller | Quedgeley has suffered too much in the past with every available green area being built on and its about time this desecration of such area's was stopped |
| 104 | Anonymous | |
| 105 | Mrs Jean Bath | |
| 106 | Tristan Staples | |
| 107 | paul leach | i agree that this land should be kept for the residents of quedgeley otherwise we wil end up with houses everywhere and no grasslands woods or pleasant areas to walk around on summer days |
| 108 | paul leach | i agree that this land should be kept for the residents of quedgeley otherwise we wil end up with houses everywhere and no grasslands woods or pleasant areas to walk around on summer days |
| 109 | Mrs D.C.Mills | No more houses in Quedgely. Keep entire Clearwater site a natural greenspace. |
| 110 | Kevin Daws | |
| 111 | Anonymous | Green spaces are essential for health of both the population and the environment. |
| 112 | Anonymous | I thought the Government's vision of 'urban renaissance' was supposed to encourage urban green space to foster city dwellers' quality of life and appreciation of the environment the gives us everything we have - green b.s. to be instantly dropped when their friends in the construction industry raise their voices just a fraction, no doubt. |
| 113 | Anonymous | I thought the Government's vision of 'urban renaissance' was supposed to encourage urban green space to foster city dwellers' quality of life and appreciation of the environment the gives us everything we have - green b.s. to be instantly dropped when their friends in the construction industry raise their voices just a fraction, no doubt. |
| 114 | Anonymous | |
| 115 | geoffrey toon | |
| 116 | Claire Digby | |
| 117 | Kevin Daws | |
| 118 | Anonymous | |
| 119 | Anonymous | |
| 120 | Caroline Dixon-Gladstone | I will be happy to help keep Quedgeley's nature areas safe for wildlife. |
| 121 | samantha cook | |
| 122 | Anonymous | |
| 123 | Anonymous | I don't want them to build on the marshland, it would be silly especially with the flooding this summer!! |
| 124 | hlovell | a small area where snipe may overwinter is far more important than building poorly sited houses.
Wetlands are for birds. |
| 125 | Ray Sherman | More development on wetland a site; is nothing sacred? It's a recipe for more flooded areas.
No I do not live in Quedgeley but I am concerned for the welfare of future generations and without specific areas for wildlife, there will be no future. |
| 126 | Julia Buchanan | As Quedgeley, and numerous other areas in and around Gloucester, become increasing lost to housing developments, it is imperitive that the last few, comparitively small, natural areas should be retained for the benefit of local wildlife and local people, both for the present and future generations. |
| 127 | Mark Williams | With all the talk of building on our green belt areas and now building on what little easily accessible green areas we have, things are looking very gloomy. Leave some space for the wildlife and for people to enjoy. |
| 128 | Richard Hill | They will take every scrap of land if we dont stand up for conservation! |
| 129 | Ken Bradford | Enough is enough.The Marsh used to be huge. It's been drained and built on leaving just a small field in it's original state.It would be sheer bloody minded vandalism to build over this unique place.Heritage is above Avarice. |
| 130 | Richard White | Please leave us space to breathe |
| 131 | Elaine Emerton | |
| 132 | Ann L Stork | |
| 133 | Donald Stockwell | |
| 134 | Kevin Daws | |