Signatures 220 total
-
1
Name: Peter Ponting on May 21, 2007Comments: Leave our open spaces free from development. Help us! see our web site www.qaca.org.ukFlag
-
2
Name: Harry Sykes on May 21, 2007Comments: I wholeheartedly support QACA in the petition that will destroy an established wetland area and public open space.Flag
-
3
Name: Claudette Butler on May 21, 2007Comments: please help save our green open spaces of Quedgeley it's so important for us and our children's futureFlag
- 4
-
5
Name: Tracy Robb on May 24, 2007Comments: This is a great open space for adults, children and dogs. My son loves playing there and keeping an eye on the tadpoles. The land gets so waterlogged, I feel sorry for anyone who did by any future dwelling built there.Flag
-
6
Name: David Robb on May 24, 2007Comments: This is a lovely area of wetland that should be left undeveloped.Flag
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
10
Name: June Russell on May 25, 2007Comments: I feel very strongly against building on Clearwater Drive. It is extremely well used by walkers, dogs and children. Recently I visited the area and seen several groups of children, flying a kite and playing cricket. Surely with the small gardens the majority of the house have it is necessary for children and adults to have areas that can be used, especially in todays time of child obesity and lack of fitness. It must be in the governments best interest to encourage the children to be able to enjoy open spaces to play sports etc.Flag
- 11
- 12
-
13
Name: Dave Mills on May 27, 2007Comments: Any development on this site would be detrimental to the valuable wetlands which are rich in amphibian & bird life.Flag
- 14
-
15
Name: Ruth Bull on May 28, 2007Comments: The way things are going we will never be able to get out of our driveway nor will there be any where for birds to land with all the green areas disappearingFlag
-
16
Name: Ian Smith on May 29, 2007Comments: The loss of one of the precious few areas of public open space (let alone a conservation area) in Quedgeley to yet more housing would be particularly objectionable when there are such large scale housing developments currently underway at Kingsway and Hunts Grove which surely must be addressing the areas so called housing shortage. Therefore, I question the necessity of the sacrifice of this land by Quedgeley residents when taking into consideration the other developments in the area.Flag
- 17
- 18
-
19
Name: Mr J R Fletcher. F.F.A.S. on May 31, 2007Comments: The rapid expansion of the buildings in all directions in these areas must be halted. I feel there are more than enough factories and huge development areas in progress without taking even more of what is left of our natural heritage, the countryside and nature that is being destroyed. In cities like London the temperatures are always warmer due to the heat we receive from the Sun not being absorbed by the natural soil but reflected back into our atmosphere we call the troposphere. This is adding to global warming but not much is ever mentioned about it. The Tuffley Weather Station: ID CW3591Flag
- 20
-
21
Name: Sammie Russell on Jun 4, 2007Comments: this is a great piece of open green land for walking dogs and for children to play on.Flag
-
22
Name: Sammie Russell on Jun 4, 2007Comments: this is a great piece of open green land for walking dogs and for children to play on.Flag
- 23
- 24
-
25
Name: Richard Russell on Jun 9, 2007Comments: i can think of a lot of different things that i believe we need in quedgeley, green open spaces being top of the list, but definitely not more houses.Flag
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
-
30
Name: Caroline Banyard on Jun 16, 2007Comments: This area is so important to the citizens of Quedgeley, please do not let it be swallowed up by yet more development in our area.Flag
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
-
35
Name: Anonymous on Jul 3, 2007Comments: Not enough schools, lesuire facilities, doctors and dental facilities, shops to include supermarkets, too much volume of traffic all of which will cause unnecessary chaos to our parish and ruin the enviroment we presently live in if more houses are built in QuedgeleyFlag
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
-
40
Name: Andy Senior on Jul 10, 2007Comments: As an occasional visitor to Quedgeley, I urge that the wetland habitat off Clearwater Drive be spared from development. The local area is already intensively populated, and those areas of open space which remain are an invaluable asset to the local community as well as a rich habitat for wildlife species.Flag
- 41
-
42
Name: Dave Gills on Jul 11, 2007Comments: The land off Clearwater Drive is not only a safe playarea for children and an undisturbed area for wildlife to thrive, but is also a natural flood plain for the surrounding area. With the recent history of flooding in various parts of Gloucester, surely there have been lessons learntFlag
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
-
47
Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2007Comments: I think this wetland is a very important area for wading birds and must be saved from developmentFlag
- 48
-
49
Name: Keith Williams on Jul 14, 2007Comments: This area is an important habitat for some uncommon species including Water Rail and Jack Snipe and on no account should it be lost for a building siteFlag
-
50
Name: Paul Masters on Jul 17, 2007Comments: Any development on this area will be detrimental to the diverse flora and fauna of the wetland., for example, the increased disturbance will mean the end of wintering Jack Snipe and Common Snipe, and breeding Water Rail to name a few. This area is a remnant of the type of habitat that would once have been common along the lower Severn vale, and as such is an important part of the natural heritage of Quedgeley.Flag