Signatures 116 total
-
1
Name: Beverly Cain on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Deborah Constable on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Mark Scarselli on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Kim Hollander on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Paul Fetscher CCIM, SCLS on Sep 8, 2008Comments: We have been involved in retail real estate since the 1960's. During that period I have had the opportunity to work on CBD Revitalizations. A few of the locations include Jamaica and Freeport, NY; Norwalk and Bridgeport, CT; Jersey City and Princeton, NJ. Other large projects include Akron Ohio and Kansas City. One Key Element to a successful reviatlization is retail space. You never gat a second chance to make a first improession. Retail is the face and the frohnt door of a cummunity. Hampering the develpment only serves to mire a community and prohibit its effective organic growth. Moratoriams only serve to pent up demand and force entrepreneurs to invest elsewhere. No moratorium ever attracted business or served a market need. I certianly hope the Kingston, a City who would benefit from new retail activity, does not make a Loose-Loose choice. It would thwart growth, limit entreprenurial cativity, fail to serve the community's needs and penalize real estate owners in your City.Flag
-
6
Name: Adrienne Mendelsohn on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Anonymous on Sep 8, 2008Comments: Please do not impose the moratorium on commercial development along Washington Avenue, especially buildings that have been left vacant. This road is a gateway to our city and first impressions are important. Instead encourage new business to come into our city and fill these vacant buildings and bring new business to our tax base.Flag
-
8
Name: Glenn Noonan on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Joe Deegan on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: John G. Stote 111 on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Angela on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Jim Meyer on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Anonymous on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Gene Rios on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Mike Zban on Sep 8, 2008Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Jay Feinberg on Sep 9, 2008Comments: This is good for Kingston!Flag
-
18
Name: Michael Cuttitta on Sep 9, 2008Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Karen Clark Adin on Sep 9, 2008Comments: The City of Kingston has been steadily declining in the 26 years that I have lived here, and there's been no significant growth within that time span. As a business owner suffering from increased taxes, I will very shortly no longer be able to conduct my business here if there is no relief - and that relief comes with expanding the tax base in the City. This site is a neglected and polluted site. As it stands now there is NO "gateway" into this City, what with a gas station, a pizzeria, a defunct automotive repair shop, a defunct gas station and a used car lot 'welcoming' visitors here. The reality is uptown Kingston is in dire straits, as is Midtown and the Rondout. Without development, we will continue to decline, stagnate and deteriorate. Respectfully yours, Karen Clark AdinFlag
-
20
Name: Bruce Chapman on Sep 9, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Mark Stryker on Sep 9, 2008Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Sep 9, 2008Comments: Gateway to Kingston It's more like a portal to a retrogressive rathole right now, and oh yes, let's keep it that way. For the first capital of New York State, it's embarrassing.Flag
-
23
Name: Thomas Collins on Sep 9, 2008Comments: It is astounding that people are content to leave an eyesore on this thoroughfare. I donFlag
-
24
Name: Francis P Flynn on Sep 9, 2008Comments: Those that oppose development still want the services which only business taxpayers fund. This disconnect is forcing residents from their homes and driving business from the city. Kingston has fewer citizens today than 48 years ago, any wonderFlag
-
25
Name: Louis Themistocles on Sep 9, 2008Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Adam Mandell on Sep 9, 2008Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Marianne Collins on Sep 9, 2008Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Susan K. Pomeroy on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Elise Mandell on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: David Mendelsohn on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Edward Hill on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Valerie Dwyer on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Michael J. Gulotta on Sep 10, 2008Comments: I may not live or work in Kingston, but I am a voting taxpayer. I also frequent the area on business and pleasure.Flag
-
35
Name: Alan Gramet, CCIM on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Joe Beichert on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Mike Piazza on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Kay Hoiby on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: David Kaplan on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Rick Fatscher on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Art D'Estrada on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Daniel Le Fever on Sep 10, 2008Comments: Buildings and Infrastructure always ware out. If you stop the flow of money or try to control it you are acting like the USSR. The USSR collapsed. The USA has been built by government allowing free trade in an open market place.Flag
-
44
Name: SCOTT MILLER on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Daniel D Gagnon on Sep 10, 2008Comments: Without commercial development in accordance with local regulations, the city will become a bedroom community of the Town of Ulster that has primarily a reail base. The need for industrial development seems to be without question.Flag
-
46
Name: Craig Paton on Sep 10, 2008Comments: We need more commercial real estate tax base!!!Flag
-
47
Name: Steve Blake on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Donald L. Brewer on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2008Comments:Flag