A Bill for the betterment of wisdom and virtue through economic reform

Signatures 17 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Steve Consilvio on Jan 15, 2009

   Comments: Yes, I signed my own petition. :-)

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Emlyn Owen on Jan 16, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: PETER CHALLEN on Mar 12, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Edwin Wooden on Aug 18, 2009

   Comments: the private Federal Reserve needs to go ,"debt -money"system,as the money supply grows the debt grows,NO NATION can SURVIVE With TAXES ASSESSED OTA from MONEY CREATED OTA OUT OF THIN AIR,DEBT-MONEY,NO FREEDOM&SECURITY until HONEST MONEY SYSTEM,

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Sterling F. Gruver on Oct 5, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Adam Vega on Jul 13, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Matt Lazarus on Jan 25, 2011

   Comments: Excellent!

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Stanislaus Wojnowski on Jan 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Morais on Jan 19, 2013

   Comments: Gosh, I wish I would have had that information ealrier!

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Lakhan on Jan 19, 2013

    Comments: Sehr Gut. Good start on Web 3.0, but 3.0 must be much more! Languages and world-orientation is healthy tuohgh not yet scientific. Web 2.0 was refreshing, even tuohgh there are no standards like a rich notation HTML, a protocol HTTP, Web server, or Web browser baseline. mrb

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Zmffjkt on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments: VTaozH dnmjumnmxwqc

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Hcqhgjbvmd on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments: L9LXsV gieigzowzvyq

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Busrrdl on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments: rbVgK3 , gtvhrhiadwyx, kzcqejttsypx, http://brciycvjwuyz.com/

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Izfbsz on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments: va0OQK , liuamknbyenx, lpxudosaynqm, http://upwnhgrjpjqa.com/

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Zikpyubwp on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments: yGuzUY , vyfrsoukvewf, clsluyacawyn, http://xdqtnbpdbpap.com/

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Ygqfmtbjybq on Jan 21, 2013

    Comments: SkFQgk picpuzlnudqi

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Nancy on Jan 21, 2013

    Comments: If you think it injustice that each state have an equal nubemr of senators then you don't want to live in a nation where we have two functionally different houses within out legislative branch.Would it be fair for the concerns of the entire nation to be dictated by the agenda of the citizens of the 9 most populous states? (9 because according to the 2000 US Census the 9 most populous states have 50% of the nations population.)The question is, does the principle of federalism still have merit, or should we live in a nation where the states are merely administrative districts of the Federal government?Federalism is based on the premise that the states are sovereign political entities and that each state should have equal standing at some place in the federal government. Do we want a system where California always has as much power as the 22 smallest states combined? In the house that is the case, and it's not very equal about population either. California has 15 times the population of Utah but 18 times the nubemr of representatives. Texas has 9 times the population but 11 times the representatives. Either we have to become a true democracy instead of a republic or else we need to do our best to minimize the inequality of our representation. Our current course favors the citizens of small states in one legislative body and the citizens of large states in the other.

    Flag

Page: 1