The CIHR Individual Grants Program.

Signatures 1967 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 40 › »

1. 1
   Name: Simon Wing, MD, on Dec 2, 2010

   Comments: I agree wholeheartedly. A whole cohort of well trained, productive researchers are at risk of being unable to do their work which represents a major loss in the investment made to train them. Unlike the United States, Canada does not have a large enough system of alternative support for investigator initiated research.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Stephane Laporte on Dec 3, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Audrey Claing on Dec 3, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: René Cardinal on Dec 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: David Goltzman on Dec 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Barry Posner, OC, MD, FRS(C) on Dec 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Coimbatore B Srikant on Dec 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: John Bergeron on Dec 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: William Powell on Dec 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Andrew Bateman on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Monzur Murshed on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Stéphanie Chevalier on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Louise Larose on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments: I have just come back from one CIHR committee evaluation. Most likely, the cutoff on this committee will be around 4.4.....

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Denis DeBlois on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Richard Kremer on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments: This is indeed a very grave situation that needs immediate attention.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Sylvain Meloche on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: André Veillette on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments: I agree fully.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Josee-France Villemure on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Elena Torban on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments: I completely agree

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Francois Fagotto on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Isabelle Royal on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Jacques Huot on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Éric A. Cohen on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Marc Therrien on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Artur Kania on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Mitchell Halperin on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments: I am enthusiastic to sign this petition. This is especially important in that external peer review is now under-emphasized.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Jacques Drouin on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Martin Schmeing on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Michel Cayouette on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Julie Bruneau on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Bernard Robaire on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Jean-Claude Labbé on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Gregory Emery on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Leif Bergsagel on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anne-Marie Lauzon on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Francois Barthelat on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Richard Leduc on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Brian Wilhelm on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Richard BERGERON on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Paul Déléris on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Kathleen Spring on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Nathalie Labrecque on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Eric Cardin on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Henri Andre Menard on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments: Idea-driven research is a laborious individual journey and it is only 10-20 years later that it become a field of research. That is to be contrasted with technology-driven research which is a "field" from the onset but, if it regularly generates neat phenomenological findings, it will very seldom generate new ideas. That is similar in medicine where we teach to students not to treat sophisticated but useless images but to treat patients in all their relevance and complexity.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Claude Perreault on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Pierre Thibault on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Jacques Turgeon on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Eric Lécuyer on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Nicolas Cermakian on Dec 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 40 › »