Stop the MTO from Paving Over Our Farm!

Signatures 465 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 10 › »

1. 1
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 17, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Gail Gordon Oliver

   Comments: We, as Ontarians, must support our farmers so that they can continue to support us by providing us with real food. No farmers should have to be forced to face the possibility of their land being expropriated in order to ease a bit of traffic congestion!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Elizabeth Baldwin

   Comments: Do not assume that current automotive patterns will necessarily be what comes to pass in the future. Driving habits WILL change, and other transportation modes will emerge. I challenge the MTO to think creatively, to think forward for ideas, not backward.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Eva Boerkamp

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Janet REdman

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Paul Andrew Armstrong

   Comments: In a society that claims that it is dedicated to fighting climate change, I find the proposal to reduce arable land in Ontario preposterous. Every effort should be made to eliminate impact to Ontario farm land. Saving a few million dollars now will cost hundreds of millions in the future. As a taxpayer I want my government to do what is right for sustainable local agriculture, not what is expedient or simply "Cost effective" in the short term. I expect my government to have vision.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Bill Osgerby

   Comments: Loss of prime agricultural land appears to be the norm in Ontario. Do we want to see an ever widening area of land lost due to multiple lanes of a poor transportation alternative Whatever happened to "forward thinking" to establish an environmental and ecoomical transportation system such as a rail system. I want to buy locally grown produce where I know that the product is safe to eat and helps our local economy!

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Gail McMane

   Comments: There must be a better solution to eleaviate the future traffic congestion then destroying farm land and homes! Perhaps businesses should allow employees to work from home more often; encourage carpooling, something to reduce traffic. But to see more green space and fertile farm land for growing produce destroyed is unacceptable.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): josh josephson

   Comments: i am a consumer of the GREAT products produced by churchill farms and losing any valuable farm land would be a great loos and a travesty.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

   Name (first and last names, please): Nancy Alles

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Michael & Collelen Baldwin

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Tracy Day

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Kevin Burnett

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Kate Baldwin

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Kate Baldwin

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Teskey Baldwin

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Steven oliver

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Fran Clements

    Comments: This is a ridiculous solution, but then it would have to do with Dalton McGinty who is also ridiculous. We (Ontario) are spending megabucks advertising our produce. Is this not counterproductive

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Laura Berman

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Darlene Litman

    Comments: The farmland should, without a question, take priority over a road.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Pamela Gordon

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): van Keerbergen Robert & Anne

    Comments: We do not want more paving over of prime agricultural land and further destruction of some of the most valuable natural resources of this province; we want to preserve our ability to feed ourselves from local sources. We want you to invest in rail transportation instead.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Patti Trussler

    Comments: My husband and I recently moved to Calgary after a lifetime in the Waterloo Region. We have enjoyed the meat products of Church Hill Farm precisely because of the care and environment that they offer their animals. In fact, one of the highlights of our recent vacation in Ontario, our first stop was at Church Hill farm to get the meat that we would need for our 2 week stay. We would hate to see their farm effected by a transportation link if it were designed without these factors in mind. Sincerely, Patti Trussler

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Chris Spotswood

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Chantelle Jack

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Kevin Jack

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Sonya Franceschini

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Sarah Megens

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Linda Dagg

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Mario Fiorucci

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Virginia Zimm

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Charmian Christie

    Comments: Cars can be rerouted, farmland can't. We need more green spaces, not more highways. Once you pave over land you can't gain it back.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Charmian Christie

    Comments: Cars can be rerouted, farmland can't. We need more green spaces, not more highways. Once you pave over land you can't gain it back.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): dagmar baur

    Comments: More pavement means more global warming and total desertification of our planet and our REAL resources. Why do we need another highway addendum when we won't have the gas to drive the cars very soon.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): karen gordon

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Cara Epp

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Cathy Smith

    Comments: Farming feeds people. Keep our farmland no matter what!!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): carmen everest wahl

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Molly MacDonald

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Laura Marchant

    Comments: We need farms and farmers more than we need another highway! We can barely feed ourselves as it is.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Kathy Guidi

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Rhoda Lipton

    Comments: So many of us are working so hard to bring local, fresh food to our communities. Why, oh why, does our government work against not for us.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Samuel Robertson

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Ian Sorbie

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Ian Sorbie

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Elizabeth Gray

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Preena

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Serena

    Comments: Some of the best growing land in Ontario is being goobled up by highway, industry and subdivisions. Where will we grow our food when there is nothing but pavement What will our children know as viable land Consider the future of food and people before the future of industry.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Siobhan Boyd

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Cheryl Gordon

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Name (first and last names, please): Anne Rawley

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 10 › »