Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 668 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 14 »

  1. 1
    Name: Jeremy Harper on Jan 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Leon Kaufman on Jan 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Oliver Nesbitt on Jan 27, 2009
    Comments: Typical lack of consultation yet again on the part of the council...
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: ELIJAH HARPER on Jan 27, 2009
    Comments: AS A CHILD CURRENTLY AT SCHOOL I WISH TO PROTEST TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ADMISSIONS POLICY.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Jeremy Harper on Jan 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Leon Kaufman on Jan 27, 2009
    Comments: Consult the parents & do not remove our choice of where to educate our children.
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Jeremy Harper on Jan 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Sandy Maclean on Jan 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: E.Chandrasekar on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Philip Withnall on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Claire Spencer on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: David Spencer on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Paul Butcher on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: West Haddon relates more to Rugby than Northampton. It is only in recent years that the address has changed from West Haddon, Rugby. It makes no sense in this time trying to change the environment to restrict educational choices just because of county boundaries
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Jeremy Harper on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: Fair access to educational opportunities for ALL children
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Terry Steeley on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: I will be affected by this ruling, I have 2 daughters, one who has taken the 11+ but her younger sister, who is in year 5, will not have the same opportunity. I would seek a phased approach at the least to accommodate children who have an expectation of being able to go to a grammar school.
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Mike Williams on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: We the people have the right to educate our children where we feel best, not the nanny state. Riase the standard and you might find more choose Northants!
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Ewen Maclean on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: Unfair, discriminatory, not consulted; and pushed through by a commmittee that was not properly represented by parents.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Helen Millichamp on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: It seems crazy that our children will not be able to attend one of the local schools because we live close to the border of Warwickshire.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Sharon Bott on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Ewen Maclean on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Liz Hood on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Mrs Wrist on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: I feel strongly about this as my child goes to a small secondary school in Rugby compared to the over subscribed schools of Daventry. She therefore has experienced more opportunities by doing so.
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Rachel Suttie on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Jacquelyn Gridley on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: David Sheen on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: In order to make the proposed changes Northamptonshire must offer a viable alternative otherwise this is just a further erosion of choice and opportunity. Everyone should be given an opportunity to reach their full potential. This proposed change initiated by the schools of Daventry is a blatant attempt to massage their performance statistics without making any real improvement in the services they offer. People would not make the choice to send their children further away if the local facilities offered the level of educational standards and opportunities expected.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: David Sheen on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: In order to make the proposed changes Northamptonshire must offer a viable alternative otherwise this is just a further erosion of choice and opportunity. Everyone should be given an opportunity to reach their full potential. This proposed change initiated by the schools of Daventry is a blatant attempt to massage their performance statistics without making any real improvement in the services they offer. People would not make the choice to send their children further away if the local facilities offered the level of educational standards and opportunities expected.
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Catherine on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: Absolutely disagree with the new proposed policy and would be willing to move house into Warwickshire area to ensure my child fulfills her potential and has the same opportunity to sit the 11+ as her brother did. How does this benefit the town in the long term
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Sam Kaufman on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: I am disgusted that our choices for educating our children could be removed without even consulting us. If this goes through then my children will not have the same educational opportunities.
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Paul Mundy on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: M Dean on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: This decision is of concern well beyond Warwickshire and Northampton. It represents a serious and unwarranted degradation of the principle of choice for parents and children and is contrary to the spirit and letter of the Admissions Code.
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: Why should parents and children be refused choice just because they live in another village or town. Parents could be working in Rugby and therefore making it far easier for dropping children at school. If children are currently in the Rugby School system why should they then be told you cannot progress and have to move schools. I have moved schools as a youngster and it is very traumatic. You loose all your friends, confidence, find it difficult to fit in with other groups - it is hard. Do not force children into this position.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Joanne Stevens on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Claire Adams on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Jane Margieson on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: It is wrong I already have a daughter at Rugby High School and this new ruling means her sister will not be able to join. All children locally should have the right to attend Rugby Schools if they and their parents so wish. If Daventry schools are not getting the children they should maybe they should look into their own school for reason why.!!
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Ian Margieson on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: All children and parents should have the right to choose which school they attend. The schools that are missing out should get their act together and make their school the one everyone wants to attend!
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Amanda Pateman on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Paul Pateman on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Jennifer J Jones on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: iT IS VITAL THAT PARENTAL PREFERENCES FOR THE EDUCATION OF THEIR CHILDREN SHOULD BE RESPE4CTED AND ACTIVATED WHENEVER THE CHILD MATCHES THE ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHOOL IN QUESTION. ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS MUST BE RATIONAL.
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Thelma Andrews on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: This affects my grandchild and I would like to know what has happened to the goverments policy of choice for parents!
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Ian Andrews on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Lesley Roberts on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: The children of West Haddon have always done well at the Rugby Schools and although in a different county it is far closer than the Northampton schools. Many have siblings that would like to be at the same school
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: I have 4 children and moved to Crick as I believed there would be the opportunity to send my children to school in Rugby. I live only a few miles from the schools in Rugby. If the admissions policy is changed, children in Warwickshire who live even 20 miles from the schools in Rugby can be admitted but my children are ruled out - this is ridiculous.
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
    Comments: The adjudicator has not consulted parents and he should have done so.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 14 »

Sponsored links