Signatures 1727 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 35 › »
-
101
Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
102
Name: SUZANNE HOLLANDER on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: Amelia Boomker on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: Lorel Martens on Nov 9, 2006Comments: Anything and everything needs to be done to evaulate newborns. I urge passage of this bill, and commend your efforts at the undertaking.Flag
-
105
Name: Jodi Lemacks on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Jeannie Reynolds on Nov 9, 2006Comments: This screening would have significantly reduced my daughter's first hospital stay. By the time we knew something was wrong at 8 days old, she was in cardiac shock. She had to be stabalized before her first surgery could be performed...this took 4 weeks.Flag
-
107
Name: Jill Harris on Nov 9, 2006Comments: My daughter passed away of CHD on Sept. 14,2006. She was 4 months old. Any information that you can find out about this terrible disease would be helpful in the future. Jill Harris, mother of Haley E. Harris - May 8,2006-Sept. 14,2006.Flag
-
108
Name: Amy Morris on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
109
Name: Deeana Fain on Nov 9, 2006Comments: This could save so many lives.Flag
-
110
Name: Julie Hayes on Nov 9, 2006Comments: As a mother to a son born with a CHD who wasn't diagnosed until hours after birth, I say "Yes! Please pass this!!" Such a simple test can save so many lives.Flag
-
111
Name: Monica Polk on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Bethany Adamson on Nov 9, 2006Comments: This would save so many lives!Flag
-
113
Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Jennifer Hicks on Nov 9, 2006Comments: If my daughter would have had this test done we would have known right away there was a problem rather than waiting 1 1/2 days. We were lucky that there weren't any complications!Flag
-
115
Name: James Nicholson on Nov 9, 2006Comments: I have a 20 month old grandson that has had 3 open heart surgeriesFlag
-
116
Name: Amy Brenny on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
117
Name: Michelle on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Sibahan Sanders on Nov 9, 2006Comments: If this were to be passed. It would make a very big impact. My son was taken at 10 days old, nearly dead because of an undiagnosed heart problem in utero.He died in oct 2004.Flag
-
119
Name: Jenny Medinger on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: Karen Grandfield on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
121
Name: Frances Lopez on Nov 9, 2006Comments: This is very important! This will help catch problems before the children are home and things could get worseFlag
-
122
Name: Audrey Townsend on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
123
Name: Brian Faust on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
124
Name: Shannon Smith on Nov 9, 2006Comments: I'd love to see this happen in NC, also.Flag
-
125
Name: Brent Smith on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: Tracie Blakemore on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
128
Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006Comments: My grandson was born 2 yrs ago with Transpositioning of the Great Vessels of his heart and this would have been a good test for him.Flag
-
129
Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006Comments: I would love to see this in Texas as well.Flag
-
130
Name: Sienna Wildwind on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
131
Name: Ida Hall on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
132
Name: Kim Davis on Nov 9, 2006Comments: My son was not screened at birth and he almost died after we came home. He was diagnosed with a congenital heart defect . Had we known about the problem we would have had him in the hospital immediately and wouldn't have risked his life. PLEASE test babies at birth. This could save a life. Maybe your own child's or grandchild's life.Flag
-
133
Name: Jenny Yeager on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006Comments: Go for it! It is a way to learn if this is a necessary screening.Flag
-
135
Name: Melonie Latson on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
136
Name: Cassandra McCreary on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
137
Name: Keiko Eda on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Rebekah Boyer on Nov 9, 2006Comments: Pulse ox testing could do so much good in detecting CHD in newborns. As a mother of a CHD child, I know how critical early detection is for the outcome of the child. Please pass this bill!Flag
-
139
Name: Bobbi Poppa on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Mary Haddix on Nov 9, 2006Comments: In my opinion this is a very necessary test for newborns. I thought it was already done. By using the pulse ox on newborns maybe lives could be saved or at least be treated earlier than waiting weeks or months & then find out the baby has a problem.Flag
-
141
Name: Kristina Way on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
142
Name: Carol Nassif on Nov 9, 2006Comments: I am the parent of a child wih Congenital heart disease. The earlier it is identified the better for the child. Pulse oximetry is a easy non invasive test.Flag
-
143
Name: Rebecca L Thomas on Nov 9, 2006Comments: I am happy to sign this petition. Almost six years ago kids like our family became parents of a CHD child. "Miles is our miracle boy thanks to the wonderful care he has received from the doctors at Vanderbilt. "Childrens lives should never be about politics" only requested by a leading physician in the that specialty, patients visited firsthand if necessary, and approved. Why does it have to be so difficult and long to get things done in TNFlag
-
144
Name: Camilla Tarryk on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
145
Name: Tiffany Bauman on Nov 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: SHELLEY HANSON on Nov 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: CLAUDIA BECKER on Nov 10, 2006Comments: Definitely a valuable diagnostic technique............let's hope the word spreads across the USAFlag
-
148
Name: Michelle Poe on Nov 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
149
Name: Susan Reed on Nov 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Lina Edwardson on Nov 10, 2006Comments: This would help in all types of casesFlag