Signatures 111 total
-
1
Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2010Comments: I agree that NCUA is seeking to overstep their bounds of authority and has not acted consistent with the fiduciary responsibilities and that industry representation is absolutely needed.Flag
-
2
Name: Danielle Lane on Dec 15, 2010Comments: The NCUA, while necessary, should be responsible to our industry as a whole. We as individual credit unions must answer to the NCUA, who should answer to all credit unions. The audacity of recent proposals for expansion and salary increases demonstrate the insular nature of the organization. The recent and ongoing assessments we are faced with would become a little more palatable if the NCUA were behaving as if we are all in this together. Credit unions should be admired for pulling together and bailing ourselves out, rather than seeking public aid. We shouldn't have to cut back, freeze wages and struggle, though, only to have our regulatory agency increase the burden with irresponsible spending.Flag
-
3
Name: Mark Buschur on Dec 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Kevin J Ralofsky on Dec 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Scott Collins on Dec 15, 2010Comments: Very dissatisfied with the current NCUA oversight of our industry...attempting to limit member's choices for their financial needs and making rules that are akin to taxation without representation since NCUA Board is not an elected body and contains no Credit Union representation. Where are the checks and balances?Flag
-
6
Name: Greg Smith on Dec 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Sandy Cummings on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Sandy Cummings on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Dec 16, 2010Comments: As this is being circulated, we see Credit Union Times reporting that NCUA Regional Directors are among the highest paid of all government employees! Enough is enough!Flag
-
10
Name: Michelle Luipold on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Jude T Hammond on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Tracy Luc on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Barbara Yost on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Barbara Yost on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Derek Callin on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Gary Elliott on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Tracy on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Heather Cantu on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Carol Middaugh on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: John Peterson on Dec 16, 2010Comments: I feel that the NCUA Board has not been listening to the vast majority of credit unions in this country. Our industry is in danger of becoming extinct unless something is done to stop the rampant spending and develop an automated program that monitors all credit unions so those in potential danger can receive assistance in time to keep them from failing. As a small credit union CEO, I wonder how long my peers and I can survive with excessive fees and unnecessary auditing requirements.Flag
-
21
Name: Laura Roberts on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Jeffrey J. Roberts on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Lynette Tabert on Dec 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Sarah Pearson on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Mike Kruger on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Nancy Bruhjell on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Nathan TePoel on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Ron Farinacci - Chairman, American Greetings Fed. Cr. Un. on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Ron Farinacci - Chairman, American Greetings Fed. Cr. Un. on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Noreen A. Peterson on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Anonymous on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Mary C Jarvis on Dec 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Randy Karnes on Dec 19, 2010Comments: If politicians can use the NET to get elected, why has our industry not harnessed the NET to create a new kind of voice for change? WE need not whine about the activities of the NCUA, we need steely resolve and new tactics to change the DESIGN of the agreement between those governed and those who "think" they are governing. When will our generation put its mark on the industry that we hope an everlasting future? Everyday operators must see thier power to cast our futures in a new direction.Flag
-
35
Name: James A. Smith on Dec 20, 2010Comments: Thank you.Flag
-
36
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Brian Walters on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Sandy Siegfried on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Thomas M. Miller on Dec 20, 2010Comments: I hope that this call to action motivates many within our industry. We must free our NPCU's from this oppression and monopolistic approach to our governance. If we fail to take these threats seriously, we will surely perish. NCUA is eating it's own... the very ones they were sworn to protect.Flag
-
40
Name: Glenn Kretchmer on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Renee Pearson on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Jenise Jaikins on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Nancy Ellwein on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Roger McElroy on Dec 20, 2010Comments: This Board has not done it's job. We need a new Board !!!!Flag
-
47
Name: Kathleen Elliott on Dec 20, 2010Comments: In these past years, credit unions have been strapped with more and more regulatory expectations taking their efforts and sight off the real reason credit unions exist...to serve their members. There is a better way than adding more expense in the "back office" areas that is basically holding back the industry from achieving their mission.Flag
-
48
Name: Keegan Daniel on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: John Beauchamp on Dec 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Jane Anderson on Dec 20, 2010Comments: More auditors, more regulations, more control, more burden on credit unions is not the answer. The weight of those factors alone stifle innovation, strip away any chance for growth and create fences around the business. These NCUA objectives are economically fractured.Flag