Signatures 6695 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 134 › »
-
251
Name: Jeff Kozak on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
252
Name:
Mark Crain on May 3, 2012
Comments:Flag -
253
Name: Joan Skinner on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
254
Name: Mark Sawyer on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
255
Name:
Lisa Biggs on May 3, 2012
Comments:Flag -
256
Name: Anonymous on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
257
Name:
Claudia Sandoval on May 3, 2012
Comments:Flag -
258
Name: Peggie Brown on May 3, 2012Comments: For shame.Flag
-
259
Name: Michael Rulon on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
260
Name: Lindsey O'Brien on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
261
Name: Carlos Fernandez on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
262
Name: Holly Harvey on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
263
Name: Ricky Hill on May 3, 2012Comments: This is one of the most horrifying articles I have seen in a great long while. Shame on Schaefer Riley, and shame on The Chronicle for printing such vitriolic, racist garbage.Flag
-
264
Name: Anonymous on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
265
Name: Olga Herrera on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
266
Name: Stephanie Vanderslice on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
267
Name: Ora Marek-Martinez on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
268
Name: John Ribó on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
269
Name: Michael Jeffries on May 3, 2012Comments: Riley's piece should never have been published. It reflects terribly on the Chronicle, and is an affront to the core principles of my life as an academic. Apology is not enough. The piece needs to be condemned, and the record corrected.Flag
-
270
Name: Kwanda Ford on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
271
Name: Lisa Nicole Edmonds-D'Amico on May 3, 2012Comments: This is one of the most racist, ignorant, vindictive, and baseless blog posts I have ever seen, and it is affiliated with The Chronicle! I am nonplussed that someone with such an obvious agenda (who is affiliated with the so-called "Institute for American Values" and no academic credentials receive a platform on CHE? Her vitriole besmirches CHE and her attack on junior scholars--not tenured academics, but the most vulnerable of scholars--is completely out of line.Flag
-
272
Name: Laura Morris on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
273
Name: Anonymous on May 3, 2012Comments: Since when did The Chronicle take seriously the backwards views of a vile racist like Riley? Shame of her and shame on The Chronicle for publishing this. Disgraceful and distasteful.Flag
-
274
Name: Guenevere Nyderek on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
275
Name:
Larry Hashima on May 3, 2012
Comments: Schaefer Riley's amazing display of anti-intellectualism soils the reputation of a publication that claims to serve the goal of "higher education."Flag -
276
Name: Matthew Countryman on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
277
Name: Roberto Soto-Carrion on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
278
Name: Latasha Levy on May 3, 2012Comments: The Chronicle of Higher Education should be ashamed of promoting and endorsing Riley's racist and anti-intellectual attack.Flag
-
279
Name: Brian Eugenio Herrera, Ph.D. on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
280
Name: Jamie Rogers on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
281
Name: Marissa on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
282
Name: Marisa Omori on May 3, 2012Comments: As a graduate student in the social sciences, it is not just extremely offensive to me to read Schaefer Riley's column, but her writing threatens millions of already-marginalized people of color. Her comments, based on ill-masked racism, do not belong in the Chronicle of Higher Education. If these are the types of articles that the Chronicle chooses to publish, it is not relevant for me or my colleagues.Flag
-
283
Name: Nina Cartier on May 3, 2012Comments: I'm all for free speech, but this was much closer to hate speech. CHE should at least present dissenting views that have academic rigor and merit (especially since that was what was being challenged.) Save the hate for the comment sections.Flag
-
284
Name: Anonymous on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
285
Name: Cassandra Lease on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
286
Name: Brian Keith on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
287
Name: Steven Nelson on May 3, 2012Comments: While I completely and utterly disagree with Riley's opinion, my ire is directed at both the personal nature of her attack and her unprofessionalism as a journalist. To make such criticisms on a whole discipline based on a few dissertation titles is simply stupid. To lodge a critique of a of these works without having read them is, I would hope, beneath the Chronicle of Higher Education's standards of responsible journalism. To call for the banishing of a whole discipline without any familiarity with its literature is reactionary at best, and unprofessional at worst. This is the stuff of FOX News, not the Chronicle of Higher Education.Flag
-
288
Name: M. Belinda Tucker on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
289
Name: Kyera Singleton on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
290
Name: Austin McCoy on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
291
Name: Cindy Klumb on May 3, 2012Comments: I was a high school and later a college student, when we fought for black studies and women's studies. History is not just about rich white men. If you really want to study history read Howard Zinn.Flag
-
292
Name: K Morris on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
293
Name: Elizabeth Baugh on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
294
Name: Casie C. Cobos on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
295
Name: Holly Smith on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
296
Name: Anonymous on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
297
Name: Isabell Moore on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
298
Name: Carol Lautier on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
299
Name: Tad Suiter on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag
-
300
Name: Mal Ahern on May 3, 2012Comments:Flag