Challenge The Chronicle of Higher Education to Dismiss Naomi Schaefer Riley

Signatures 6695 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 130, 131, 132, 133, 134 › »

1. 6601
   Name: Leah A. Ghoston on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 6602
   Name: Rachele Louis on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 6603
   Name: Rachele Louis on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 6604
   Name: JS on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 6605
   Name: Kerry Marsden on May 10, 2012

   Comments: This article was repugnant and The Chronicle should not have published it. Bad job.

   Flag
6. 6606
   Name: Marie Becker on May 10, 2012

   Comments: The only lack of scholarship here is Schaefer Riley's.

   Flag
7. 6607
   Name: Janet Zuelke on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 6608
   Name: Jallah Rouse on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 6609
   Name: Lauren Griffin on May 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 6610
    Name: Anita Ragunathan on May 10, 2012

    Comments: What Naomi Schaefer Riley wrote is in no way academic and does not deserve publication in an academic journal. Her article was a petty attack on an important subject that is especially relevant today as we combat the idea that we live in a post-racial society. I thank Naomi for one thing, and that is proving that Black Studies has never been so important.

    Flag
11. 6611
    Name: Bill Lowman on May 10, 2012

    Comments: yes racism and progress exist in the same time and space. check your physics. this is racism.

    Flag
12. 6612
    Name: Anonymous on May 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 6613
    Name: Suzanne Spellen on May 10, 2012

    Comments: Any student, regardless of color, gender, or nationality should be free to write on whatever topic is allowed by their dictates of the program they are enrolled in. No one has the right to cherry pick what they feel is a worthy topic. Frankly, it's none of their business.

    Flag
14. 6614
    Name: Hans Saunders on May 10, 2012

    Comments: This has no place in academia, much less the world. I do not condone such harsh and unfounded criticism of students who have done hard work and deserve praise for their research and dedication.

    Flag
15. 6615
    Name: Saloni Singh on May 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 6616
    Name: Helen on May 10, 2012

    Comments: We don't need free speech. When we disagree with someone, make sure they are banned from presenting their point of view. That's the Soviet, er, I mean Nazi, uh, I mean American way.

    Flag
17. 6617
    Name: Sheldon Cooper on May 10, 2012

    Comments: It's not that the three student's work was not done well. It's just that their work is not worth doing.

    Flag
18. 6618
    Name: Nina Power on May 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 6619
    Name: Juli Parker on May 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 6620
    Name: Renee Dennis on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 6621
    Name: Dimitri Davis on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 6622
    Name: Andrew Kao on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 6623
    Name: Elaine Salo on May 11, 2012

    Comments: Schaefer Riley and the Chronicle of Higher Ed should apologize unreservedly to the young Black Studies scholars who were treated with such contempt in the pages of this publication

    Flag
24. 6624
    Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 6625
    Name: Robert Devendorf on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 6626
    Name: Jonathan Lange on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 6627
    Name: Joel Floyd on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 6628
    Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 6629
    Name: Sarah Gott on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 6630
    Name: Anonymous Facebook user on May 11, 2012

    Comments: The Chronicle must also take blame for allowing such nonsense to be published. Polemic stances may indeed be featured in academic discourse, but vicious racial attacks are unacceptable.

    Flag
31. 6631
    Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 6632
    Name: Angela Hoyte on May 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 6633
    Name: Asia Johnson on May 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 6634
    Name: Peter Post on May 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 6635
    Name: Katie Seitz on May 12, 2012

    Comments: This is a disgrace. A patently racist disgrace.

    Flag
36. 6636
    Name: C.d. Chase on May 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 6637
    Name: Amanda Ford on May 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 6638
    Name: Drollene Brown on May 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 6639
    Name: Julie Jenkins on May 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 6640
    Name: Beverley Gachette on May 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 6641
    Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 6642
    Name: Adelia & Dave Vachon on May 13, 2012

    Comments: Who is this Riley idiot anyway????????????

    Flag
43. 6643
    Name: Caroline Meister on May 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 6644
    Name: Christopher Ramos on May 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 6645
    Name: Isidor Gamaliel Norant on May 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 6646
    Name: Sarah Fox on May 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 6647
    Name: Jennifer Fraser on May 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 6648
    Name: Kelvin J. Monroe on May 14, 2012

    Comments: Funny, she will not go after established top notch scholars (of any race) who are Black: i.e.: Ronald A. T. Judy (so-called white scholars can't even get with him--so heavy, he publishes in international multi-lingual journals) just to name one of my idols...And as the bogger wrote, she goes after professionally vulnerable junior scholars. Typical of them.

    Flag
49. 6649
    Name: Erin Seiler on May 15, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 6650
    Name: Laura R. M. on May 15, 2012

    Comments: It's a disgrace that a purportedly serious publication will publish a piece of extreme right wing claptrap (see what I did there?) such as this one. The bile and the racism in Schaefer Riley's article discredits not only her and her intelligence, but also the publication as a whole.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 130, 131, 132, 133, 134 › »