Challenge The Chronicle of Higher Education to Dismiss Naomi Schaefer Riley

Signatures 6695 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, ... 134 › »

1. 5951
   Name: Kiefer on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 5952
   Name: David Alt on May 5, 2012

   Comments: It is ridiculous and maddening that you have become a platform for such racist and anti-intellectual crap.

   Flag
3. 5953
   Name: Erik Jensen on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 5954
   Name: E N on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5955
   Name: Levon Valle on May 5, 2012

   Comments: This isn't about opinion, but about upholding the standards once established here at CHE. As a regular reader - although infrequent commenter - on this site, I could possibly stomach Ms. Riley's vitriol if her opinions were of someone already established in the field. However, she chose to attack three students who have not yet completed their dissertations without even seriously researching or investing time in the material currently available, as somehow proof that an entire field should be removed. Her unapologetic response, and the rather blase attitude of those who call the outrage at her blog an "overreaction" are especially unbecoming of CHE. In short: if I want to read a tabloid or pop-psychology-esque article, I go to Newsweek; I actually expect to learn something here or debate with others on arguments that are accurate and have some f*cking sense, not the tripe that's been published and latently defended.

   Flag
6. 5956
   Name: Marcella McClure on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 5957
   Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 5958
   Name: Nikki Yeboah on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 5959
   Name: Angela Aguilar on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 5960
    Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2012

    Comments: The Chronicle of Higher Education's permission has really amplified the question of its ethics, motivation and editorial quality. This is shameful.

    Flag
11. 5961
    Name: C. Stephens on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 5962
    Name: Eric Boyd on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 5963
    Name: Debra Guckenheimer on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 5964
    Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 5965
    Name: Elaine Richardson on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 5966
    Name: Richard T. Rodriguez on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 5967
    Name: Cynthia D Gonzalez on May 6, 2012

    Comments: I was appalled when I read about Schaefer Riley's attack on Black Studies. Whats next the attack of woman Studies? Better yet lets not educate anyone who is not WASP.. give me break. To those students.. good for you for chasing your dreams and wanting to make a difference in the world.

    Flag
18. 5968
    Name: Mary Clayton Coleman on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 5969
    Name: Don Ramon on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 5970
    Name: Anonymous on May 6, 2012

    Comments: Why is this woman in academia?

    Flag
21. 5971
    Name: Bonnie Tilland on May 6, 2012

    Comments: This piece of writing is simply sickening.

    Flag
22. 5972
    Name: Olivia Hamilton on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 5973
    Name: Gabriel Cooper on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 5974
    Name: Kimberly Crockett on May 6, 2012

    Comments: Time to go!!!

    Flag
25. 5975
    Name: Rachel Mulheren on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 5976
    Name: Anna DiStefano on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 5977
    Name: Tomomi Kinukawa on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 5978
    Name: Rod on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 5979
    Name: Valerie McLaurin on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 5980
    Name: Diya Bose on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 5981
    Name: Jannelle Drummond on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 5982
    Name: Ferdinand Ibebuchi on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 5983
    Name: Jamie Whitt on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 5984
    Name: Anonymous on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 5985
    Name: Bernadine Hernandez on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 5986
    Name: Vern Morrison on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 5987
    Name: Avery Ke on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 5988
    Name: Sidonie Devarenne on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 5989
    Name: Andrew Mills on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 5990
    Name: Ira Allen on May 6, 2012

    Comments: Riley does not, in short, practice journalism, which is a process that involves making--and checking--warranted assumptions. But many people do not practice journalism, and there is not time to petition for all of their jobs. Riley's great offense is to perpetrate hate speech as academic journalism, and for this she should lose her job at the Chronicle.

    Flag
41. 5991
    Name: Anonymous on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 5992
    Name: Reginald Grant on May 6, 2012

    Comments: Fire her, she is out of touch, unprofessional and a racist.

    Flag
43. 5993
    Name: Joan Sitomer on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 5994
    Name: Lily Anne Y. Welty on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 5995
    Name: Maurits Van Der Veen on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 5996
    Name: Tina Kaebnick on May 6, 2012

    Comments: I read the response by the CHE editor. So now CHE has officially elevated Schaefer Riley's tirade to something considered worthy of debate in CHE. I hope they will issue an apology for this response, as well as the original hate piece by Riley.

    Flag
47. 5997
    Name: John Pravos on May 6, 2012

    Comments: CHE wants different view points. Fine. So does the New York Times. But they hire David Brooks, not Glenn Beck. One would hope that CHE is able to make such distinctions.

    Flag
48. 5998
    Name: Casey Kennedy on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 5999
    Name: Neha on May 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 6000
    Name: Michele Martindill, Ph.D. on May 6, 2012

    Comments: The work of journalists is to thoroughly research their subject matter. Schaefer Riley by her own admission did not read the dissertations she criticized--she failed to thoroughly research the dissertations and how they relate to Black studies. Schaefer Riley is a fraud and most certainly not a journalist. CHE is apparently making an attempt to grab readers by turning to tabloid journalism.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, ... 134 › »