Canadians for Fair and Equitable Taxation

Signatures 464 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »

1. 151
   Name: Stacy Nichols on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments: This is especially in light of the fact that the government made an exception in the case to the JDSU employees at christmas time

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Jim Courtney on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments: Obviously a problem for the unsuspecting. To help understand the issue such that a better case can be built, it would be useful to know what tax loopholes, if any, may be opened up by making these changes and why, from a Revenue Canada perspective, they have not recommended a change before now.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Ken Huckell on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Robert W McQueen, C.A. on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Alan Baldwin on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Yi Liang on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Norm Francis on Apr 1, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Phil Dubois on Apr 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Darren Frew on Apr 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Angus Maclaren on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments: This law seems very unfair to people who work very hard to develope companies and products to improve the economics of Canada.

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Ean Jackson on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments: This review is long overdue. The current policy discourages entrepreneurship, which I do not feel is the intent of government

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Linda Price on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Alex Perklin on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments: Options should be viewed as a vital element in the creation of a vibrant IT industry. Common sense should prevail based on an understanding that any cash tax payments should be associated with a realized cash benefit [e.g., at disposition].

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Dianne Escude on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Lisa Yeates on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: G Carlucci on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Don Safnuk on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Denis Trudeau on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Warren Wong on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Thomas Gordon O'Flaherty on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: I can accept a tax on actual gains, where the funds are available for paying tax. However, "paper gains" like this make no sense

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Tam Ngo on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: This is an unfair tax and politicians need to fix this immediately!

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: I am effected by this issue.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Mel Roberts on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Michael Smith on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Rob Cook on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Michael Vax on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Bob Miller on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Shirley Ivan on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: Thanks for your attention to this matter. As a respectible Canadian, I paid my taxes as I was instructed to do. However, have always felt it was unjust to tax me for money I never made. I had left Nortel had to exercise my options. Still believing it was a great company and not in any need for immediate cash, I bought the stocks and put them into my account. Who new the stock would go down to less than I paid

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Carl Hoyt on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Jonathan Back on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: This is clearly unfair, no profit was made, so why tax it

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: Some of my friends have been victim of this barbarian law. It must go before it destroys so many families.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Christopher Kubash on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments: I am personally affected by this issue. I exercised options of Scientific Atlanta (SFA) when I left the company. SA was subsequently sold at a far lower price. I am now on the hook for a phantom gain. Why do I not deserve the same treatment as other Canadians in the same position

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Iain Harris on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments: The CRA and Finance have already given selective relief to favoured parties such as JDS Uniphase. Clearly, others are affected but without the same political inflence. In the interest of tax fairness, the benefit must be treated as a taxable capital gain, which is available as an offset in the case of a realized capital loss.

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Tim Pezarro on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Carole Hawe on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Cheryl Hann on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Xiang (Sean) Zhu on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments: I have been waiting for this petition for a long time. I believe that there are lots of people there who are in the similar situation and don't know CFET. It is fortunate for me to read an article in Ottawa Business Journal. Let us do something to save lifes and families of many hard working tax payers!

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Bruce Lounds on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments: This is an unfair approach to taxation and needs to be corrected.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: John Davey on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Paul Thiel on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Randy Busch on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Jim Murphy on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments: This is a core issue of fairness for individuals and a wet blanket on tech business development in Canada.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Kathy Butler on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Randall Howard on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments: This regressive tax situation predominates in future-oriented, knowledge-based companies and their employees and executives. As a result, this is one more component of a regulatory and tax fabric which make it harder for us to be internationally competitive in this all-important sector.

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »